Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Salutogenic Approach Based Interview With People With Schizophrenia

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04740944
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 5, 2021
Last Update Posted : February 5, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Özgür Sema ACI, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Brief Summary:
This study determines the effectiveness of the interviewing based on salutogenic approach on the sense of coherence and resilience of people with schizophrenia. For this, while the intervention group was subjected to salutogenic approach-based interview consisting of 16 sessions twice a week. The control group continued their routine activities and was interviewed face-to-face 5 times.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Salutogenesis Mental Health Disorder Schizophrenia Sense of Coherence Behavioral: Salutogenic Approach Based Interview Not Applicable

Show Show detailed description

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 49 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Official Title: The Effect of Salutogenic Approach Based Interview on Sense of Coherence and Psychological Resistance of People With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date : December 31, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date : November 28, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date : December 31, 2019

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Schizophrenia

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
the intervention group was subjected to salutogenic approach-based interview consisting of 16 sessions twice a week.
Behavioral: Salutogenic Approach Based Interview
Salutogenic Approach Based Interview has five basic components. (1) Continuity of health, (2) The story of the person, (3) Health promoting factors, (4) Understanding the health promoting power of tension and strain, (5) Active adaptation In traditional therapy recommended for recovery, more emphasis is placed on negative life events, diagnosis and medication. In the salutogenic approach-based interview, the resources and coping potential of the person are discussed and three healing factors are focused on for the recovery process. These factors are that the participants (1) perceive themselves as more than just a diagnosis and disease, (2) self-discovery and respect for other people's self-discovery, (3) control over their own lives. In the intervention, mental health nurses take part as group leaders. The focus in interviews is therapeutic conversations.

No Intervention: Control group
The control group continued their routine activities and was interviewed face-to-face 5 times.



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Sense of Coherence Scale_13 (SOC_13) [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]
    At the end of 8 weeks (16 sessions of salutogenic approach based interview ), they were evaluated using the sense of coherence scale which was developed by Antonovsky (1987) is a self-report scale consisting of a total of 13 items ranging between 1 and 7. The scale allows to use subscale scores and calculate total score. Higher scale scores indicate that individual has higher sense of coherence. In the reliability studies of the original version of the scale, internal consistency coefficients were calculated as .62 for "meaningfulness", .54 for "manageability", .57 for "comprehensibility", and .69 for overall scale.

  2. Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]
    At the end of 8 weeks (16 sessions of salutogenic approach based interview ), they were evaluated using brief resilience scale which was developed by Smith et al., (2008) to measure resilience of individuals. The scale is a 5-point likert self-report assessment instrument with 6 items. High BRS scores signify higher resilience of a person.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Sense of Coherence Scale_13 (SOC_13) [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]
    At the end of 12 weeks (16 sessions of salutogenic approach based interview + 1 month), they were evaluated using the sense of coherence scale which was developed by Antonovsky (1987) is a self-report scale consisting of a total of 13 items ranging between 1 and 7. The scale allows to use subscale scores and calculate total score. Higher scale scores indicate that individual has higher sense of coherence. In the reliability studies of the original version of the scale, internal consistency coefficients were calculated as .62 for "meaningfulness", .54 for "manageability", .57 for "comprehensibility", and .69 for overall scale.

  2. Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]
    At the end of 8 weeks (16 sessions of salutogenic approach based interview ), they were evaluated using brief resilience scale which was developed by Smith et al., (2008) to measure resilience of individuals. The scale is a 5-point likert self-report assessment instrument with 6 items. High BRS scores signify higher resilience of a person.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion criteria of the study:

  • Getting diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • Completing acute treatment and being at maintenance medication period

Exclusion criteria of the study

  • Being at the period of psychotic relapse
  • Having mental development disorder
  • Being under the influence of alcohol-drugs
  • Having diagnosed with personal disorder
  • Being considered unsuitable to include in the group study by doctors and nurses of CMHC.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04740944


Locations
Layout table for location information
Turkey
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa Institute of Granduate Studies
Istanbul, Turkey
Sponsors and Collaborators
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: OZGUR S ACI, Dr Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
Additional Information:
Publications of Results:
Other Publications:
Bag B, Salutogenic model in mental health and psychiatric nursing. Current Approaches in Psychiatry. 2017:9: 284-300.
Baş AU, Yurdabakan İ. The predictive value of resilience and school climate in life satisfaction among middle school students. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty. 2017;1: 202-214.
Bilge A, Mermer G, Çam O, Çetinkaya A, Erdoğan E, Üçkuyu N. Profıle of communıty mental health centers in Turkey between 2013-2015 years. Journal of Health Sciences of Kocaeli University. 2016;(2): 1-5.
Çapan BE, Arıcıoğlu A. Forgiveness as predictor of psychological resiliency. e-International Journal of Educational Research. 2014;(5): 70-82.
Doğan T. Adaptation of the brief resilience scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. The Journal of Happiness ve Well-Being. 2015;3: 93-102.
Griffiths CA. A critical analysis of Antonovsky's sense of coherence theory in relation to mental health and mental disorder and the effect of a lifelong learning intervention on the sense of coherence of mental health service users, Doktoral Thesis, Middlesex University.Dubai. 2010.
Korlin D, Wrangsjo B. Treatment effects of GIM therapy. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy. 2002.(11): 3-15.
Köroğlu A, Hocaoğlu Ç. The effect of schizophrenia on the family. Journal of Duzce Univertsity Health Sciences Institute. 2017;(7): 170-175.
Langeland E, Sense of coherence and life satisfaction in people suffering from mental health problems. An intervention study in talk-therapy groups with focus on salutogenesis. Doctoral Thesis, Dissertation for The Degree Doctor Rerum Politicarum, University of Bergen, Norway.(2007).
Tan KK, Chan SWC, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. Self-care program for older Community-dwellers: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2014; 5(4): 145-155.

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Özgür Sema ACI, Dr, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04740944    
Other Study ID Numbers: Nurse_Psychiatric
First Posted: February 5, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 5, 2021
Last Verified: February 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No
Plan Description: There is no plan to share to IPD

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Özgür Sema ACI, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa:
Salutogenesis
sense of coherence
resilience
schizophrenia
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Schizophrenia
Mental Disorders
Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders