Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block (LEAP-Block) (LEAP-Block)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04730921 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : January 29, 2021
Last Update Posted : February 4, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Atrioventricular Block Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Right Ventricular Pacing Heart Failure | Device: Left bundle branch area pacing Device: Right ventricular pacing | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 458 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block (LEAP-Block): A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Actual Study Start Date : | November 13, 2020 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | June 30, 2024 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 31, 2025 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: LBBAP group
AV block patients randomized to left bundle branch area pacing
|
Device: Left bundle branch area pacing
Left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing form for ventricular pacing. In patients received LBBAP, the pacing lead will be placed at left bundle branch area to achieve narrow paced QRS duration. |
|
Active Comparator: RVP group
AV block patients randomized to right ventricular pacing group
|
Device: Right ventricular pacing
Right ventricular pacing is the traditional pacing modality for ventricular pacing. The pacing lead was placed in the apex or septum of right ventricle. |
- The primary endpoint is the time to a first event of composite outcomes, including all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, and an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing induced heart failure. [ Time Frame: Within two years after device implantation ]
All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy.
Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): Upgrade from dual-chamber pacemaker to CRT-Pacemaker/CRT-Defibrillator due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).
- Rate of the composite outcomes of all-cause death and/or hospitalization for heart failure [ Time Frame: Within 2 years after device implantation ]All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy.
- Rate of the composite outcomes of hospitalization for heart failure and/or an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing induced heart failure. [ Time Frame: Within 2 years after device implantation ]
Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy.
Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Upgrade from dual chamber pacemaker to CRT-P/CRT-D due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).
- Rate of the composite outcomes of LVEF <50%, and/or an increase in LVESV ≥15% during follow-up as compared with the value at randomization [ Time Frame: Within 2 years after device implantation ]Echocardiography will be assessed every 6 month during follow-up to determine whether the LVEF is less than 50% and/or the LVESV is increased by 15% or more.
- The value of LVEF and LVESV assessed by echocardiography at 1-year and 2-year follow-up [ Time Frame: 24 months ]Echocardiography will be assessed at 1-year, and 2-year follow-up and the absolute value of LVEF and LVESV will be compared between two groups.
- The time to a first event of LVEF <50% and decrease in LVEF by ≥ 10% during 2 years follow-up as compared with the value at randomization. [ Time Frame: 24 months ]Echocardiography will be assessed every 6 month during follow-up to determine whether the LVEF is less than 50% and decreased by 15% or more as compared with the value at randomization.
- The immediate success rate of the LBBAP procedure [ Time Frame: 1 weeks ]Successful LBBAP procedure is identified according to ECG and intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) during the procedure. All LBBAP procedures will be categorized as selective left bundle branch pacing (S-LBBP), non-selective left bundle branch pacing(NS-LBBP), or left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP).
- The rate of procedure and Device related complications [ Time Frame: 24 months ]Procedure complications include pneumothorax, hemothorax, and air embolism. Device related complications include lead and pocket complications.
- Changes in Pacing parameters and ECG characteristics. [ Time Frame: 24 months ]Pacing parameters include pacing thresholds (ventricle), Sense ampitude (ventricle), Impedance (ventricle). ECG characteristics include paced QRS duration and QRS morphology, etc.
- The occurrence of LV dyssynchrony [ Time Frame: 24 months ]The occurrence of LV dyssynchrony will be evaluated by echocardiography during 2-year follow-up.
- Atrial high-rate episodes recorded by the pacemaker [ Time Frame: 24 months ]Atrial high-rate episodes recorded in the pacemaker will be followed during two years of follow-up
- The long-term success rate of LBBAP [ Time Frame: 24 months ]In LBBAP group, the successful LBBAP will be identified according ECG features at 2-years follow-up
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- a. Adult patients aged 18-90;
- b. AV block patients with ventricular pacing indications and the expected rate of ventricular pacing(VP)> 40%, including (a)Third-degree AV block; (b) Second degree AV block (type II); (c) intermittent advanced AV block with expected VP>40%; (d)Symptomatic first degree AV block and PR interval on ECG ≥ 250ms;
- c. The subject is able to receive a pectoral implant;
- d. The subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol;
- e. The subject is expected to remain available for follow-up visits at the study centers.
- f. Subject or authorized legal guardian or representative has signed and dated the study Subject Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- a. Baseline echocardiographic assessment of patients with impaired LV function (LVEF<50%);
- b. Having difficulties in follow-up: Those who cannot accept 2-year follow-up on time due to physical condition or other reasons;
- c. Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation;
- d. Pacemaker replacement without new implanted ventricular electrodes;
- e. Patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications;
- f. Surgery is required within 1 year due to severe structural heart disease;
- g. Patients with tricuspid mechanical valve replacement, or congenital heart disease (including transposition of the great arteries, or permanent left superior vena cava, etc), or AV block resulting from: (a) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM)vpost (modified) Morrow surgery, (b) ventricular septal defect repair; and those who are unlikely to achieve successful LBBAP procedure.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04730921
| Contact: Xiaofei Li, M.D. | +8617801013995 | lixiaofei0103@163.com | |
| Contact: Zhao Wang, M.D. | +8618010421619 | dream_wangzhao@163.com |
| China, Beijing | |
| Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University | Not yet recruiting |
| Beijing, Beijing, China, 100029 | |
| Contact: Yongquan Wu, M.D. +8613810751596 wuyongquan67@163.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Yongquan Wu, M.D. | |
| Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | Recruiting |
| Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037 | |
| Contact: Zhao Wang, M.D. 01088322405 dream_wangzhao@163.com | |
| Contact: Xiaohan Fan, Ph.D. 01088322402 fanxiaohan@fuwaihospital.org | |
| Sub-Investigator: Xiaofei Li, M.D. | |
| Principal Investigator: Xiaohan Fan, Ph.D. | |
| Peking Union Medical College Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730 | |
| Contact: Taibo Chen, M.D. | |
| Principal Investigator: Taibo Chen, M.D. | |
| China, Hebei | |
| The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University | Not yet recruiting |
| Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China | |
| Contact: Ruiqin Xie, M.D. ruiqin_xie@sina.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Ruiqin Xie, M.D. | |
| China, Henan | |
| Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450003 | |
| Contact: Haitao Yang, M.D. leoparddoctor1@163.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Haitao Yang, M.D. | |
| The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University | Not yet recruiting |
| Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450052 | |
| Contact: Chunguang Qiu, M.D. +860371-66913114 qcg123@163.com | |
| Principal Investigator: Chunguang Qiu, M.D. | |
| China, Tianjin | |
| Tianjin Medical University General Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300052 | |
| Contact: Wenjuan Zhang, M.D. | |
| Principal Investigator: Wenjuan Zhang, M.D. | |
| Teda International Cardiovascular Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
| Tianjin, Tianjin, China | |
| Contact: Wenhua Lin, M.D. | |
| Principal Investigator: Wenhua Lin, M.D. | |
| Study Chair: | Xiaohan Fan, PhD. | Fuwai Hospital |
| Responsible Party: | Fan Xiaohan, Professor, MD, PhD, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04730921 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
2020-1379 |
| First Posted: | January 29, 2021 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | February 4, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | February 2021 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | Yes |
| Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: | Yes |
|
Atrioventricular Block Left bundle branch area pacing Right ventricular pacing |
|
Atrioventricular Block Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Heart Block |
Arrhythmias, Cardiac Cardiac Conduction System Disease Pathologic Processes |

