Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Neuro-Oncology Wellbeing (ACT NOW)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04722237
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : January 25, 2021
Last Update Posted : January 25, 2021
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
University of Nottingham
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
University of Exeter
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
University of Surrey
Newcastle University
University of Bristol
DNA-v International
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Brief Summary:

Background. Survivors of childhood brain tumours have the poorest health-related quality of life of all cancer survivors due to the multiple physical and psychological sequelae of brain tumours and their treatment. Remotely delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may be a suitable and accessible psychological intervention to support young people who have survived brain tumours.

Aims. This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of remotely delivered ACT to improve quality of life among young brain tumour survivors.

Method. This study is a two-arm, parallel group, randomised controlled trial comparing ACT with waitlist control. Participants will be aged 11-24 years and survivors of brain tumours who have completed cancer treatment. Participants will be randomised to receive 12 weeks of ACT either immediately or after a 12-week wait. The durability of treatment effects will be assessed by further follow-up assessments at 24-, 36- and 48- weeks. The DNA-v model of ACT will be employed, which is a developmentally appropriate model for young people. Feasibility will be assessed using the proportion of those showing interest who consent to the trial and complete the intervention. A range of clinical outcome measures will also assess physical and mental health, everyday functioning, quality of life and service usage. Acceptability will be assessed using participant evaluations of the intervention, alongside qualitative interviews and treatment diaries analysed thematically.

Discussion. This study will provide an initial assessment of the value of remotely delivered ACT in supporting recovery and coping for young people after brain tumour treatment.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Brain Tumors Quality of Life Brain Tumor, Pediatric Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 72 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: This study is a two-arm, parallel group, randomised controlled trial comparing ACT with waitlist controls who will then receive ACT after the 3-month waiting period. Participants will be randomised on a 1:1 ratio to receive 12-weeks of treatment either immediately or following a 12-week wait. The treatment will be DNA-v which is a model of ACT adapted to those aged 11-24 years. The model will be further adapted for those who have undergone brain tumour treatment. As trial therapists will perform assessments, blinding is not possible. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48-weeks post-randomisation with primary end point at 12-weeks.
Masking: None (Open Label)
Masking Description: As trial therapists will perform assessments, blinding is not possible.
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Young Brain Tumour Survivors: An Acceptability and Feasibility Trial
Estimated Study Start Date : February 1, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date : January 2023
Estimated Study Completion Date : January 2023

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Brain Tumors

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Immediate Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Receiving 6-to-12 weekly sessions of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy immediately after allocation. Each session will be up to one hour in length.
Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an evidence-based psychological therapy that has been used to improve physical and mental health among adults with health conditions, including cancer (Graham, Gouick, Krahe, & Gillanders, 2016). It fosters engagement with, rather than avoidance of, painful experiences, to move towards acceptance of unchangeable difficulties alongside building a rich and meaningful life despite the presence of ongoing problems.

No Intervention: Waitlist Control
Receiving no intervention during a 12-week wait, though no restrictions will be placed on the use of other services. After the wait participants will receive 6-to-12 weekly sessions of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Each session will be up to one hour in length.



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Treatment completion rate [ Time Frame: assessed at 3-month follow-up ]
    The proportion of patients showing interest who then consent to the trial and complete the intervention

  2. Treatment completion rate [ Time Frame: assessed at 6-month follow-up ]
    The proportion of patients showing interest who then consent to the trial and complete the intervention

  3. Session attendance rate [ Time Frame: assessed at 3-month follow-up ]
    The session attendance rate compared to feasibility benchmarks

  4. Session attendance rate [ Time Frame: assessed at 6-month follow-up ]
    The session attendance rate compared to feasibility benchmarks

  5. The credibility/expectancy questionnaire [ Time Frame: Assessed at baseline ]
    Assessing participant ratings of treatment credibility. Minimum score = 5; maximum score = 45. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

  6. The credibility/expectancy questionnaire [ Time Frame: Assessed at session 2 ]
    Assessing participant ratings of treatment credibility. Minimum score = 5; maximum score = 45. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

  7. The experience of service questionnaire [ Time Frame: Assessed at 3-month follow-up. ]
    A questionnaire used nationally in child and adolescent mental health services completed by patients and parents/carers (if under 16) to assess participants' experience of the intervention. An additional item has been added to the experience of service questionnaire to assess video-conferencing treatment satisfaction. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 20. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

  8. The experience of service questionnaire [ Time Frame: Assessed at 6-month follow-up. ]
    A questionnaire used nationally in child and adolescent mental health services completed by patients and parents/carers (if under 16) to assess participants' experience of the intervention. An additional item has been added to the experience of service questionnaire to assess video-conferencing treatment satisfaction. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 20. Higher scores indicate better outcome.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    A brief 7-item self-report measure assessing psychological inflexibility, which is the central treatment target for ACT. Validated for use among patients aged 16 and over. Minimum score = 7; maximum score = 49. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  2. Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth 8-items [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    A brief self-report measure of psychological inflexibility, for children (11 to 15 year old participants). Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 32. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  3. World Health Organisation wellbeing index 5-items [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    A brief self-reported assessment of wellbeing and mental health. Minimum score = 7 score; maximum = 49. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 49. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  4. Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment 7-items [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    A brief self-reported measure of generalised anxiety symptoms using 4-point Likert scales based on diagnostic criteria. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  5. Patient Health Questionnaire 9-items [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    Assesses symptoms of depression using self-reported 4-point Likert scales based on diagnostic criteria for major depression. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 27. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  6. Euroqol 5-dimensions 3-levels [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    a self-reported assessment of five key dimensions of health-related quality of life: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The youth version will be used for participants under 16 years old. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 1. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

  7. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    Assesses satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. It, therefore, acts as a measure of social engagement which can be heavily impacted by brain tumour diagnosis and treatment. Minimum score = 8; maximum score = 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  8. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire 25-item [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    A patient and parent/carer-completed brief measure of behavioural and emotional functioning. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 50. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

  9. Client Service Receipt Inventory [ Time Frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up ]
    A research instrument developed to collect information on service receipt, service-related issues and income. In addition, the Client Service Receipt Inventory collects information on school attendance in the 3-months prior to assessment.

  10. Experiential interviews [ Time Frame: assessed at 3- and 6-month follow-up ]
    Participant experiences of treatment as described in semi-structured qualitative interviews



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   11 Years to 24 Years   (Child, Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 11-to-24 years at the time of randomisation
  • Received treatment for a brain tumour at a participating Principle Treatment Centre
  • Active brain tumour treatment is complete and their condition stable for at least six-months
  • Have sufficient cognitive ability to engage with ACT sessions as judged by the clinician at baseline assessment
  • competent to provide informed consent (participants aged 16 or over) or assent (participants aged 11-15)
  • Parent/carer competent to provide informed consent (for participants aged 11-15)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received a structured behavioural intervention within six-months prior to study recruitment
  • Previous or current alcohol/substance dependence, psychosis, suicidality, or eating disorder
  • Moderate or severe intellectual disability, confirmed through researcher judgement at screening through questions relating to school type and previous diagnoses
  • Immediate risk to self or others
  • The patient or their parent/carer is not able to speak, read or write English

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04722237


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Sam Malins, PhD 0115 9249924 ext 86165 sam.malins@nottingham.ac.uk

Locations
Layout table for location information
United Kingdom
Nottingham University Hospitals Recruiting
Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
Contact: Sam Malins, PhD    0115 9249924 ext 86165    sam.malins@nottingham.ac.uk   
Sponsors and Collaborators
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
University of Nottingham
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
University of Exeter
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
University of Surrey
Newcastle University
University of Bristol
DNA-v International
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Sophie Thomas, DClinPsy Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04722237    
Other Study ID Numbers: 266746
First Posted: January 25, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: January 25, 2021
Last Verified: January 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Participant consent will be requested for the publication of anonymised questionnaire data onto the Figshare research repository, in line with current research transparency best practice guidance (Miguel et al., 2014; Nosek et al., 2015).
Supporting Materials: Study Protocol
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Analytic Code
Time Frame: Data will be published after the trial results are published.
Access Criteria: Data will be openly available from Figshare

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust:
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Cancer
Oncology
Quality of survival
children and adolescents
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Neoplasms
Brain Neoplasms
Central Nervous System Neoplasms
Nervous System Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases