Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Localized Muscle Vibration Post Stroke

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04700553
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 8, 2021
Last Update Posted : February 16, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Giuseppe Annino, University of Rome Tor Vergata

Brief Summary:

Background and objectives: Lower extremity functional impairments are common consequences of stroke. Thus, continuous examination of effective treatment interventions for lower extremity functions after stroke is a necessity. Localized muscle vibration (LMV) is one of the treatment interventions that incorporate sensory stimulation to improve motor cortical excitability. This study aimed to investigate the influences of 10-minutes lower extremity LMV application along with conventional physical therapy (CPT) on activities of daily living (ADL) and motor recovery on the hemiparetic lower extremity post-stroke.

Methods: A sample of 37 patients with stroke (8 females) was randomly allocated to either conventional physical therapy (CPT) control group (n=18) or conventional physical therapy and localized muscle vibration (CPT+LMV) experimental group (n=19). All patients received 3 sessions per week of CPT for 8 weeks. The CPT+LMV experimental group received 10-minute LMV at the end of each CPT session. The outcome measures used were the Barthel Index (BI), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and goniometry for Range of Motion (ROM) assessment.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Stroke Device: Localized muscle vibration Other: Conventional physiotherapy intervention Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
All patients in both experimental and control groups received CPT protocol consisted of 30 minutes of manual resistance exercise (3 sets/10 repetitions each for knee extensors and flexors) and 30 minutes of treadmill training, short breaks (1-5 minutes) were allowed, depending on the patient tolerance. The training was conducted for 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The patients in CPT+LMV experimental group received localized muscle vibration at the end of each CPT session. The LMV was applied for 10 minutes perpendicularly along quadriceps muscle fibers. The frequency set at 30 Hz, amplitude of 2 mm.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 37 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Efficacy of Localized Muscle Vibration on Lower Extremity Functional Ability in Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date : November 1, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 31, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date : December 31, 2020

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Conventional physical therapy intervention plus localized muscle vibration
physical therapy intervention plus localized muscle vibration
Device: Localized muscle vibration
All patients in both experimental and control groups received CPT protocol consisted of 30 minutes of manual resistance exercise (3 sets/10 repetitions each for knee extensors and flexors) and 30 minutes of treadmill training, short breaks (1-5 minutes) were allowed, depending on the patient tolerance. The training was conducted for 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The patients in CPT+LMV experimental group received localized muscle vibration at the end of each CPT session. The LMV was applied for 5 minutes perpendicularly along quadriceps muscle fibers. The frequency set at 30 Hz, amplitude of 2 mm.
Other Names:
  • manual resistance exercise
  • treadmill training

Other: Conventional physiotherapy intervention
All patients in both experimental and control groups received CPT protocol consisted of 30 minutes of manual resistance exercise (3 sets/10 repetitions each for knee extensors and flexors) and 30 minutes of treadmill training, short breaks (1-5 minutes) were allowed, depending on the patient tolerance. The training was conducted for 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The patients in CPT+LMV experimental group received localized muscle vibration at the end of each CPT session. The LMV was applied for 5 minutes perpendicularly along quadriceps muscle fibers. The frequency set at 30 Hz, amplitude of 2 mm.
Other Names:
  • manual resistance exercise
  • treadmill training

Sham Comparator: Conventional physical therapy intervention
physical therapy intervention
Other: Conventional physiotherapy intervention
All patients in both experimental and control groups received CPT protocol consisted of 30 minutes of manual resistance exercise (3 sets/10 repetitions each for knee extensors and flexors) and 30 minutes of treadmill training, short breaks (1-5 minutes) were allowed, depending on the patient tolerance. The training was conducted for 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The patients in CPT+LMV experimental group received localized muscle vibration at the end of each CPT session. The LMV was applied for 5 minutes perpendicularly along quadriceps muscle fibers. The frequency set at 30 Hz, amplitude of 2 mm.
Other Names:
  • manual resistance exercise
  • treadmill training




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Barthel Index (BI) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline activity of daily livings at 8 weeks ]
    The Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (BI). Measure of functional disability. The BI consisting of 10 common activities of daily living (ADL) activities, administered through direct observation. These are assessed for independence/ dependence and scored via an arbitrary weighting system (originally applied to reflect nursing care and social acceptability). Eight of the ten items represent activities related to personal care; the remaining 2 are related to mobility. The index yields a total score out of 100 - the higher the score, the greater the degree of functional independence


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Berg Balance Scale [ Time Frame: Change from baseline balance at 8 weeks ]
    The BBS provides a quantitative measure of balance. This scale consists of 14 items requiring patients to maintain their positions or complete tasks of varying levels of difficulty. All items are related to everyday life tasks. A score of zero represents an inability of the patient to complete the task and a score of 4 represents the ability of the patient to complete the task independently. The total scores range from 0 - 56. A total score of less than 45 indicates a balance impairment.

  2. Goniometry [ Time Frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks ]
    Range of motion assessed by goniometry; is the measurement of angles, particularly those formed by joints. These angles may be measured in a standing position or in flexion or extension.

  3. Manual Muscle Testing [ Time Frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks ]
    The MMT was used to assess muscle strength. The MMT consists of 6 grades. Grade 0 indicates no evidence of contractility (complete paralysis), and 5 indicates movement against gravity plus full resistance.

  4. Modified Ashworth Scale [ Time Frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks ]
    The MAS was utilized to measure spasticity. The scale asses the resistance of limb to a rapid passive stretch in 6 scores from 0 to 5. Score 0 indicates normal muscle tone, and 5 indicates rigid limb.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Confirmed diagnosis of stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

If they had any serious orthopedic injury/disease, cardiopulmonary problems or suffered from a neurological disease (other than stroke).


Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04700553


Locations
Layout table for location information
Italy
Policlinico Tor Vergata
Rome, RM, Italy, 00133
Sponsors and Collaborators
Giuseppe Annino
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Giuseppe Annino, PhD University of Rome Tor Vergata
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Giuseppe Annino, Professor, University of Rome Tor Vergata
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04700553    
Other Study ID Numbers: 187/20
First Posted: January 8, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 16, 2021
Last Verified: February 2021

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Stroke
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Vascular Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases