Ventilation in Cardiac Arrest (VICA)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04657393 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : December 8, 2020
Last Update Posted : January 20, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Over the last decades, research in cardiopulmonary resuscitation was primarily focused on uninterrupted chest compressions to restore sufficient circulation. Ventilation during ongoing chest compressions was regarded as potentially deleterious and thus not given any major scientific focus. Current guidelines advise that ventilation be monitored by end-tidal CO2 and emphasize that hyperventilation be avoided. Recent findings from arterial blood gas analyses showed high levels of arterial pCO2, resulting in a frequent occurrence of hypercapnic acidosis, which may be caused by iatrogenic hypoventilation. Ventilation during ongoing chest compressions can be hard to achieve, as nearly every breath may be terminated by simultaneous chest compressions. In case of bag ventilation the applied tidal volumes have not yet been measured und mechanical ventilators so far were not able to ventilate during chest compressions, because pressure limit settings induced termination of inspiration.
The aim of this study is to provide patients with the best possible ventilation, even under ongoing cardiac massage. Patients are ventilated with a new turbine-driven ventilator (Monnal T60, Air Liquide, France), which can deliver adequate tidal volumes within a very short inspiratory phase due to the inspiratory flow of > 200l/min. Thus, in deviation from the current recommendations, the ventilation rate can be doubled to 20/min, so that inspiration coincides with cardiac massage less often. The study compares effective ventilation volumes applied by two regimes, 10 breaths/min and 20/min. Success in gas exchange is monitored by arterial blood gas analysis; ventilation parameters are adapted for each patient to requirements accordingly
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Cardio Respiratory Arrest Cardiac Death Ventilation Therapy; Complications Apnea | Procedure: mechanical ventilation | Not Applicable |
Restoration of circulation is undoubtedly the base of success in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current guidelines on CPR require that hyperventilation be avoided during CPR. Blood gas analysis results from the "BABICA trial" demonstrate that more than 90% of patients have highly elevated levels of pCO2 and are acidotic, mainly due to hypercapnia. No hyperventilated or alkalotic patients were found during CPR. Furthermore, higher pO2 values were found to be associated with improved outcomes. Current recommendations to limit ventilation frequency to 10/min was also critically questioned in a recent study from Belgium, which did not show any positive effect of low respiration rate compared to higher ones, cut-off 10/min. There are currently no clinical trials addressing optimal tidal volumes or minute volumes during CPR.
A major obstacle to continuous measurement of respiratory minute volumes during CPR is ongoing cardiac massage. In a retrospective study in which respiratory volumes were derived from bioimpedance curves, better outcomes were found in the group of more frequent ventilations. Common machine ventilators display set values, while expiratory volumes are averaged and may be overlaid by volume shifts of cardiac massage. In a recent study, investigators analyzed flow curves, where each breath can be evaluated individually and volumes can be derived correctly using dedicated software. We were able to test this method on a comparative study of three ventilators study on anatomical cadavers.
This study aims to detect whether a higher rate of ventilation using a turbine driven ventilator is able to provide higher breathing volumes during ongoing chest compressions in individuals suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Higher ventilation and oxygenation parameters as well as optimized acid-base-balance and increased rates of ROSC are expected.
Patient care (chest compressions, venous access, endotracheal intubation, application of drugs, defibrillation if necessary) is conducted according to current recommendation for Advanced Life Support (ALS) as issued by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC). Ventilation is performed at one of two patterns: the control group is ventilated at 10 breaths per minute, the intervention group is ventilated at 20 breaths per minute. Patterns are selected randomly by opening a sealed envelope which is fixed on the ventilator. After successful endotracheal intubation mechanical ventilation is carried out using a turbine-driven ventilator (Monnal T60, AirLiquide, France). Ventilator settings are pre-set: respiratory frequency is set at 10/min or 20/min (see above), other ventilator parameters remain identical: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) 5 mmHg, FiO2 1,0, tidal volume 6ml/kg ideal body weight [men: 50+(0.91x(body length-152.4)), women: 45+(0.91y(body length-152.4))]. These calculations can be performed on the ventilator itself by entering patients' age, height and gender. Chest compressions are carried out without interruptions and without considerations regarding the respiratory cycle. After initiation of ventilation arterial cannulization and arterial blood gas analysis - if possible- is performed after 5 and 10 minutes of CPR. If these analyses yield critically abnormal results (pCO2<35mmHg or >75mmHg) changes in ventilation may be made by the prehospital care physician. Study measurements end after disconnecting the ventilator.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 120 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | prospective, randomized, parallel study |
| Masking: | Single (Participant) |
| Masking Description: | randomizing the study groups |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Prospective Comparison of Ventilation Patterns During Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest |
| Actual Study Start Date : | June 1, 2019 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | November 30, 2021 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 31, 2021 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Alternative Ventilation Rate
ventilation is performed at 20 breaths/min
|
Procedure: mechanical ventilation
change of ventilation frequency |
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Ventilation Rate
ventilation is performed at 10 breaths/min
|
Procedure: mechanical ventilation
change of ventilation frequency |
- Minute ventilation [ Time Frame: during ongoing chest compressions ]exspiratory ventilatory volume per minute
- adequacy of ventilation - pH [ Time Frame: during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation ]Evaluation of ventilation success per using arterial blood gas analyses (pH)
- adequacy of ventilation - paCO2 [ Time Frame: during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation ]Evaluation of ventilation success per using arterial blood gas analyses (paCO2)
- ROSC [ Time Frame: during prehospital resuscitation efforts ]Return of Spontaneous Circulation
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
- cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts
- endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria:
- children and adolescents (age<18 years at inclusion)
- pregnant women
- previous documented lack of legal capacity
- previous documented refusal to participate in trials
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04657393
| Contact: Gerhard Prause, MD | +43316385 ext 81170 | gerhard.prause@medunigraz.at |
| Austria | |
| Medical University of Graz | Recruiting |
| Graz, Styria, Austria, 8036 | |
| Contact: Gerhard Prause, MD +43316385 ext 81170 gerhard.prause@medunigraz.at | |
| Principal Investigator: | Gerhard Prause, MD | Medical University of Graz |
| Responsible Party: | Medical University of Graz |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04657393 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
VICA |
| First Posted: | December 8, 2020 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | January 20, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | January 2021 |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
| Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: | No |
|
cardiopulmonary resuscitation mechanical ventilation Gas exchange |
|
Apnea Heart Arrest Death Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
Pathologic Processes Respiration Disorders Respiratory Tract Diseases Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory |

