Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Management of my Bipolarity Intervention in Bipolar Disorder Patients (MoB)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04643210
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : November 25, 2020
Last Update Posted : November 25, 2020
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Maria Karanikola, Cyprus University of Technology

Brief Summary:
The Management of my Bipolarity study aims to develop an educational intervention (MoB EI) on the combined use of technology and face to face education on the empowerment of ill health self-management skills in adults with bipolar disorder. The MoB EI will be developed according to qualitative data on patients' educational needs and relevant literature. The effectiveness of acquired knowledge and self-management skills will be assessed according to the degree of a) cognitive functioning, b) impulse control, c) adherence to pharmacotherapy, d) relapse prevention, d) improvement of quality of life of participants.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Bipolar Disorder Affective Psychosis, Bipolar Manic-Depressive Psychosis Depression, Bipolar Behavioral: F2F MoB EI Other: MoB DP Not Applicable

Show Show detailed description

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 80 participants
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: The study is a combination of a qualitative and a quantitative, interventional (quasi experimental) design. A focus group and content analysis will be implemented for the qualitative assessment of the educational needs of adults with a bipolar disorder. The educational intervention (MoB EI) will be developed according to the qualitative data on patients' educational needs and relevant literature, aiming to include combination of face to face (F2F) and technology-based interventions via design of a Digital platform. The effectiveness of the MoB EI regarding the acquired self-management skill will be assessed via structured instruments in the quantitative part of the study using descriptive and inferential statistics (SPSS version 24.0).
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: The Management of My Bipolarity Intervention on the Combined Use of Technology and Face to Face Education on the Empowerment of Ill Health Self-management Skills in Adults With a Bipolar Disorder
Actual Study Start Date : July 30, 2018
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 31, 2022
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 31, 2022

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Bipolar Disorder

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: F2F MoB EI and access to MoB Digital Platform (MoB DP) group

The design of the face-to-face Management of my Bipolarity educational intervention (F2F MoB EI) will rely on the Colom & Vieta model, Cognitive- Behavioural techniques and the results of the relevant literature review and data acquired in the qualitative research of bipolar disease patients' educational needs. A textbook will be devised explaining in detail the step-by-step process and the techniques of the experimental educational method of the MoB F2F EI.

This group will also receive the technology-based intervetion, which regards access to the MoB DP. This is an ecosystem where the participants will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile.

Behavioral: F2F MoB EI

The MoB F2F EI will comprise a total of 12 educational F2F sessions. Each session will have a duration of 1.5 hours and the maximum number of participants in the groups will be 12 patients.

The intervention group will receive the MoB F2F EI on group or personal form according to the participant's choice. The implementation methodology of the MoB F2F EI will include videos and power point presentations, as well as interactive learning methods such as role-playing, empowerment exercises, live discussions.


Other: MoB DP
This is a technology-based intervention, which regards access to a dfigital platform, the MoB DP. The structure of the Digital platform has been partially based on the preferences and needs of the participants (as described in the qualitative part of the study) and its goal is to create an ecosystem where users will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile. The Digital platform will be in the form of a dynamic website with user generated content as well as static information.

Active Comparator: The MoB DP group
This group will receive the technology-based intervention, which regards access to the MoB DP. The structure of the MoB DP has been partially based on the preferences and needs of the participants (as described in the qualitative part of the study) and its goal is to create an ecosystem where users will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile. The Digital platform will be in the form of a dynamic website with user generated content as well as static information.
Other: MoB DP
This is a technology-based intervention, which regards access to a dfigital platform, the MoB DP. The structure of the Digital platform has been partially based on the preferences and needs of the participants (as described in the qualitative part of the study) and its goal is to create an ecosystem where users will be educated and empowered making use of the internet of things (IOT) via a computer, tablet or mobile. The Digital platform will be in the form of a dynamic website with user generated content as well as static information.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Bipolar disease patients educational needs [ Time Frame: 6 months ]

    Qualitative measures: 1. Knowledge/ mental health literacy on present medical condition (measurement tool [MT]/ Open-ended question: Please tell us, what do you know about your mental health condition/ BD?) 2. Knowledge gap regarding BD (MT/ Open ended question: Please describe what you would like to know about bipolar disorders).

    3. Topics to be covered (MT/ Open ended question: Please describe in what way/topics you would like to be educated on bipolar disorders/to increase your knowledge about bipolar disorders? 4. Educational and feasibility expectations (MT/ Open-ended questions: a. Please describe your expectations from an educational program regarding the impact on your everyday living b. How you would like this program to be implemented one on one or in a group? C. How long would you like the program to last? 5. e-Health literacy (MT/ Open ended question: What is your level of engagement with the Internet?)


  2. Degree of self-perceived quality of life as measured by the total score in the scale "World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment". [ Time Frame: 18 months ]

    The scale "World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment" is a 1-5 Likert type scale including 26 items. The minimum score in the scale is 26 and the maximun is 130.

    Higher scores indicate a better outcome.


  3. Level of knowledge regarding BD, as measured by the total score in the scale "Bipolar Disorder Knowledge Scale". [ Time Frame: 18 months ]
    The "Bipolar Disorder Knowledge Scale" is a 25-item true-false scale. The scale assesses knowledge of BD with items targeting diagnosis, etiology, disease course, symptoms, treatment, and life impact. The ration of "true" to "false" responses is assessed. Higher percentage values indicate a better outcome.

  4. Degree of ability to control impulses, as measured by the total score in the scale "YOUNG MANIA RATING SCALE " (YMRS) . [ Time Frame: 18 months ]
    The "YMRS" is a 0-4 likert scale, including 11 items. The total score of the scale ranges from 0 to 44. The lower the total score the better the outcome.

  5. Degree of adherence to pharmacotherapy, as measured by the total score in the scale "Drug Attitude Inventory" (DAI). [ Time Frame: 18 months ]
    The "DAI" is a 30 item "true-false" scale.The ration of "true" to "false" responses is assessed. Higher percentage values indicate a better outcome.

  6. Degree of dysfunctional attitudes towards substance use as measured by the total score in the scale "Drug Use Disorders Identification Test" (DUDIT). [ Time Frame: 18 months ]

    The scale DUDIT is a 1-5 Likert, 11-item scale (scale total score range: 1-55) . The lower the total score the better the outcome.

    Lower scores indicate a better outcome.


  7. Degree of dysfunctional attitudes towards alcohol as measured by the total score in the scale "Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test" (AUDIT). [ Time Frame: 18 months ]

    The AUDIT scale is a 0-4 Likert, 10-item scale (scale total score range: 0-40) .

    Lower scores indicate a better outcome.


  8. Frequency of relapses, as measured by the number of hospitalizations after the completion of the face to face intervention. [ Time Frame: Two years following the end of the face tot face educational intervention. ]

    The number of hospitalizations will be measured as the sum of the individual hospitalizations in a high security psychaitric hospital.

    The lower the number of the frequency the better the outcome.


  9. Reduced duration of relapses, as measured by the duration of inpatient hospitalizations in days after the completion of the face to face intervention. [ Time Frame: Two years following the end of the face to face educational intervention. ]

    The duration of inpatient hospitalizations will be measured as the sum of the days of hospitalization in high security psychaitric hospitals.

    The lower the duration in days of the hospitalization the better the outcome.


  10. Degree of feasibility of the digital platform, as measured by users' qualitative feedback on the following open-ended question: "Please tell us, what was your experience with the MoB DP use? [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    The more positive the described experience the better the outcome.

  11. Degree of feasibility of the digital platform, as measured by the users' qualitative feedback on the impact of the MoB DP on their life based on the following open-ended question: "Please tell us, what was the impact of the MoB DP use on your life?" [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    The more positive the described impact of the MoB DP on users' life the better the outcome.

  12. Degree of feasibility of the digital platform, measured by users' feedback on the impact of the platform on their self-management skills based on the question "What was the impact of the platform on your ill health self-management skills?" [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    The more positive the described impact of the digital platform on users' ill health self-management skills the better the outcome.

  13. Degree of feasibility of the digital platform, as measured by users' self-reported degree of satisfaction on MoB DP by the total score on the scale "Users' Satisfaction Scale" (USS). [ Time Frame: 6 months ]

    The USS is 1-3 Likert scale (low;moderate/accepted; high), which includes 6 items, assessing users' perceptions about overall experienced satisfaction (item1); utility according to their present medical condition (item 2); feasibility on daily usage (item 3); technical difficulties experienced (item 4); improvement of BD self-management skills (item 5); improvement of BD knowledge (item 6).

    The total score of the USS ranges between 6- 18. The higher the total score the better the outcome.



Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Description of the topics of the MoB educational intervention through a qualitative measure. [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Measurement tool: Open-ended question "Please describe on which topics you would like to be aducated or increase your knowledge on BD with focus on therapeutic issues, pathophysiology, well-being and patients' rights."

  2. Description of the mode of the MoB educational intervention through a qualitative measure. [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Measurement tool: Open-ended question "Please describe the mode through which you would like to recieve information with special focus on the duration, number of sessions and duration of each session of the intervention"

  3. Description of the different modes of the MoB educational intervention through a qualitative measure. [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Measurement tool: Open-ended question "Please describe the mode through which you would like to recieve information with focus on personal or group sessions, face-to-face or via internet sessions "

  4. Description of the MoB DP technology-based intervention through a qualitative measure. [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Measurement tool: Open-ended question "What is your preferences regarding a technology-based educational intervention on BD with focus on the topics to be included, on the information provision mode (interactive or not), and access modes (tablet, mobile, personal computer)?"



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis based on DSM-5 for BD type I and II.
  2. Age between 18 and 65.
  3. Signed informed consent.
  4. Stabilized mood status at the beginning of the MoB F2F intervention based on clinical assessment, conducted by the primary investigator (AH).
  5. Experience of the illness of at least one year based on reported medical record.
  6. Adequate awareness of the illness, based on the following guide: (a) are you aware of the reason(s) you are using mental health services/ under medication? and (b) are you aware of the aim of the educational intervention in which you may participate?

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Intellectual disability (IQ<70), based on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS).
  2. Brain damage (e.g, following a stroke), based on diagnostic tests.
  3. Acute phase of the illness which requires hospitalization.
  4. Acute phase of the illness, based on clinical assessment, as well as the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and/or Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) tools.
  5. Substance use problems at the beginning of this stage according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) tools.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04643210


Locations
Layout table for location information
Cyprus
Cyprus University of Technology
Limassol, Cyprus, 3041
Sponsors and Collaborators
Cyprus University of Technology
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Maria NK Karanikola Cyprus University of Technology
Publications:
21. Hatzioannou A, Papastavrou E, Chatzittofis A, Karanikola M. Exploration of the effectiveness of structured education in empowering people with Bipolar Disorder. Nursing Care & Research 2020;55:246-274.

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Maria Karanikola, Accosiate Professor, Cyprus University of Technology
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04643210    
Other Study ID Numbers: 5.34.01.7.6Ε/0490/2018
EEBK/EΠ/2018/27 ( Other Identifier: CYPRUS NATIONAL BIOETHICS COMMITTEE )
First Posted: November 25, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: November 25, 2020
Last Verified: November 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Through publications
Supporting Materials: Study Protocol
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Informed Consent Form (ICF)
Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Analytic Code
Time Frame: After the end of the study and for the next 5 years
Access Criteria: These will be decided upon the end of the study

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Maria Karanikola, Cyprus University of Technology:
Education
Empowerment
Bipolar Disorder
Self-management
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Disease
Bipolar Disorder
Psychotic Disorders
Mental Disorders
Affective Disorders, Psychotic
Pathologic Processes
Bipolar and Related Disorders
Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders