Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Treatment Strategy of Pancreatic Radiolucent Stone

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04628273
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 13, 2020
Last Update Posted : December 2, 2020
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Zhaoshen Li, Changhai Hospital

Brief Summary:
Treatment strategy of chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients with large pancreatic radiolucent stone (≥ 5mm) has not been established. We aimed to figure out clinical features and efficacy of endotherapy for large pancreatic radiolucent stone.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Chronic Pancreatitis Procedure: encoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Detailed Description:

1. Treatment strategy of CP patients with large pancreatic stone:

  1. . For patients with large radiolucent stone,ERCP with balloon sphincteroplasty was performed directly to remove radiolucent stone. If ERCP intubation failed, endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic duct, surgery or medication would be applied. ESWL was performed in the following situations. Frist, MPD strictures was so severe that dilation catheter can not be inserted during ERCP. Second, there was cystic dilatation in MPD and pancreatic radiolucent stone located in cystic dilatation could not be extracted by extraction balloon or basket. In the above cases, the naso-pancreatic catheterwas inserted during ERCP, and then ESWL would be performed with repeated injection of contrast medium. After ESWL, repeated washing and negative pressure drainage were performed, and at last contrast medium was injected again to make sure the stones were cleared. For patients without MPD strictures, the nasopancreatic catheter can be directly removed, otherwise the nasopancreatic duct would be cut off into a stent.
  2. . For patients with large radiopaque stone, repeated P-ESWL sessions were performed, and ERCP was routinely performed 48 hours after the last P-ESWL. If ERCP intubation failed, medication or surgery would be recommended.

2. A prospective cohort study was conducted in CP patients with large radiolucent stone. Patients with large radiopaque stone were matched as the control group, with a ratio of 1:2 according to admission time.

3. The primary outcome was pain relief. The secondary outcomes were stone clearance, quality of life score, and changes in pancreatic exocrine and endocrine function.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 52 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: A Prospective Cohort Study of Large Pancreatic Radiolucent Stone
Actual Study Start Date : March 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 30, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : January 30, 2020

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Pancreatitis

Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
radiolucent stone group Procedure: encoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
radiopaque stone group Procedure: encoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. rate of pain relief [ Time Frame: after treatment to 2020-01-30 ]
    Pain relief is evaluated by Izbicki pain score and classified as complete relief (Izbicki pain score ≤ 10) or partial relief (Izbicki pain score > 10 after a decrease of > 50%)


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. rate of stone clearance [ Time Frame: during ERCP procedure ]
    Rate of stone clearance is evaluated by ERCP as follows: a) complete clearance as clearance of > 90% of stone volume; b) partial clearance as clearance of 50%-90% of stone volume; c) unsuccessful clearance as less than 50% clearance of stone volume

  2. score of life quality [ Time Frame: after treatment to 2020-01-30 ]
    Quality of life score was a subjective evaluation index of patient which ranged from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating a better quality of life



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
CP patients with pancreatic radiolucent stones large than 5mm from March 2011 to December 2018 admitted to Changhai Hospital were included in this study. Patients with pancreatic radiopaque stones large than 5mm were matched as the control group, with a ratio of 1:2 according to admission time. CP was diagnosed primarily based on the Asia-Pacific consensus. Pancreatic radiopaque stone was diagnosed by CT scan while radiolucent stone by MRI or MRCP.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis; With pancreatic radiolucent stones large than 5mm

Exclusion Criteria:

Autoimmune pancreatitis; Groove pancreatitis; Pancreatic cancer diagnosed within 2 years after diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis

Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Zhaoshen Li, Director of Gastroenterology,Changhai Hospital;Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering, Changhai Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04628273    
Other Study ID Numbers: Large PRS
First Posted: November 13, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: December 2, 2020
Last Verified: November 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis, Chronic
Pancreatic Diseases
Digestive System Diseases