Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Radial Artery Cannulation Using Two Different Methods.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04617106
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 5, 2020
Last Update Posted : September 21, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Dr Sujan Dhakal, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.

Brief Summary:
Radial Artery cannulation using conventional palpation vs USG guided Dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) method.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Radial Artery Cannulation Procedure: Radial artery cannulation Not Applicable

Show Show detailed description

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 52 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: In patients undergoing elective surgery who need arterial catheter placement, radial artery cannulation will be done using either the conventional palpation method or USG-guided dynamic needle tip positioning method before the induction of anaesthesia. In one group, radial artery cannulation will be done using the conventional palpation method, and in the second group, USG-guided dynamic needle tip positioning method will be employed.
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: Palpation Versus Ultrasound-guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique for Radial Artery Cannulation in Adult Surgical Patients
Actual Study Start Date : December 3, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 27, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date : March 27, 2021

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Palpation group
In patients undergoing elective surgery who need arterial catheter placement, radial artery cannulation will be done using the conventional palpation method.
Procedure: Radial artery cannulation
cannulation of Radial artery using standard IV cannula (axillary drug port will be taped using opaque adhesive)

Active Comparator: DNTP group
In patients undergoing elective surgery who need arterial catheter placement, radial artery cannulation will be done using USG-guided dynamic needle tip positioning method.
Procedure: Radial artery cannulation
cannulation of Radial artery using standard IV cannula (axillary drug port will be taped using opaque adhesive)




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. First pass success rate between conventional palpation method with USG-guided DNTP method [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months ]
    compare the successfully obtaining an arterial waveform with a single skin puncture, irrespective of the number of needle re-directions needed.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. To compare the number of skin punctures between conventional palpation method with USG-guided DNTP method [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months ]
    puncture in the skin made by the cannula in an attempt to cannulate the radial artery will be assessed between the groups

  2. To compare the number of cannulae used for successful radial artery cannulation between conventional palpation method with USG-guided DNTP method [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months ]
    number of cannula required for successful cannulation between two groups will be compared

  3. To compare the time duration for successful cannulation in conventional palpation method with USG-guided DNTP method [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months ]
    total time (in seconds) taken from the placement of USG-probe on the prepped wrist or when the operator begins palpation of the radial pulse to the appearance of the arterial waveform in the monitor will be compared between two groups

  4. To compare overall five-minute success rate in conventional palpation method with USG-guided DNTP method. [ Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months ]
    overall success between two groups after 5 minutes will be compared



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients undergoing elective surgeries Patients who require arterial cannulation as determined by the consultant anaesthesiologist Age: 18 years or above

Exclusion Criteria:

Type D ulnopalmar arch patency during Barbeau test Patient with a documented history of peripheral vascular disease Infection or other soft tissue lesions at the site of cannulation A surgical procedure involving the cannulation site Patients receiving inotropes or vasopressors.

  • History of radial artery cannulation within the past one month at the planned cannulation site.
  • Patients with an arterial catheter in-situ (any site)

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04617106


Locations
Layout table for location information
Nepal
Tribhuwan University Teaching Hospital
Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal, 44600
Sponsors and Collaborators
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Dr Sujan Dhakal, Resident Doctor, PGY II, Anesthesia and Critical care, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04617106    
Other Study ID Numbers: 686-2020
First Posted: November 5, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 21, 2021
Last Verified: September 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Supporting Materials: Study Protocol
Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Time Frame: data will be available within 2 months of completion of study, around August 2021. It will be available for 2yrs form the time of completion of study.
Access Criteria: anyone interested in similar research can access.

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No