Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Use of a Self-Directed Exercise Program (SDEP) Following Selected Lower Extremity Fractures

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04612478
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : November 3, 2020
Last Update Posted : January 27, 2022
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Rachel Seymour, Atrium Health

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and value of clinic-based physical therapy (PT) and a home-based, self-directed exercise program (SDEP). The home exercise program will be developed by a team of physical therapists, orthopaedic trauma surgeons and experts in rehabilitation engagement in collaboration with patients recovering from traumatic lower-extremity injuries. The study will also determine which subgroups of individuals based on patient and injury characteristics are the best candidates for a home exercise program.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Musculoskeletal Injury Behavioral: Self-Directed Exercise Program Behavioral: Clinic-Based Physical Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

There is little clinical debate that patients with multiple extremity injuries or injuries with associated complex soft tissue damage or nerve deficits benefit from supervised PT. Prior research from the LEAP Study examined the impact of PT on patients with high energy trauma injuries below the distal femur.1 While the surgeons and PTs differed in their assessment of perceived need for PT,2,3 evidence demonstrates the beneficial effect of PT for this patient population.4 Research on combat-related lower extremity limb salvage patients showed a significant benefit and a higher return-to-duty rate following intense and focused rehabilitation combined with an integrated orthotic.5-7 However, the majority of lower extremity fractures seen in the military and civilian sectors are not combat related or of the severity of the Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) limb salvage patients and, thus may not require intensive, clinic-based, supervised PT treatment. Patients with isolated major lower extremity fractures may benefit from a self-guided, home-based post-injury exercise program. Studies evaluating home exercise programs for elective orthopaedic reconstruction surgery for joint replacement and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL )reconstruction have reported equivalent outcomes compared to in-person, supervised PT.8-12 Because PT resources are critical, limited, and expensive in most civilian centers, identifying the patients who would most benefit from utilizing these resources could result in savings for both the patients and the health care systems, and lead to more efficient access to PT services by the population who needs them the most. In addition to health systems benefits, patients able to achieve positive outcomes through a home-based, self-directed exercise program would experience flexibility regarding when the exercises are performed.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and value of clinic-based PT and a home-based, self-directed exercise program (SDEP). The home exercise program will be developed by a team of physical therapists, orthopaedic trauma surgeons and experts in rehabilitation engagement in collaboration with patients recovering from traumatic lower-extremity injuries. The study will also determine which subgroups of individuals based on patient and injury characteristics are the best candidates for a home exercise program.

Hypothesis: The overall hypothesis is that return to work/major activities as well as clinical and functional outcomes and health-related quality of life for patients who receive clinic-based PT will be similar to patients receiving SDEP.

Specific Aim 1: To compare the effectiveness of SDEP, exercise instructions given by physician and clinic-based PT for improving return to work/major activities, clinical and functional/performance outcomes and health-related quality of life in patients following selected lower-extremity fractures.

Specific Aim 2: To determine which sub-groups of patients, based on patient and injury characteristics, are most likely to benefit from SDEP.

Specific Aim 3: To compare the cost-effectiveness of clinic-based PT and SDEP

.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 150 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Use of a Self-Directed Exercise Program (SDEP) Following Selected Lower Extremity Fractures
Actual Study Start Date : March 14, 2018
Estimated Primary Completion Date : March 14, 2022
Estimated Study Completion Date : March 14, 2023

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Clinic-Based Physical Therapy
Patients will be referred to PT by the orthopaedic surgeon for enrollment into a clinic-based PT program per usual referral patterns at the surgeon's center. Patients will receive services based on their health care benefits defined by his or her insurance plan.
Behavioral: Clinic-Based Physical
Patients will be referred to PT by the orthopaedic surgeon for enrollment into a clinic-based PT program per usual referral patterns at the surgeon's center. Patients will receive services based on their health care benefits defined by his or her insurance plan.

Self-Directed Exercise Program
The full SDEP program, which will be developed by physical therapists, orthopaedic trauma surgeons, and investigators with experience in health behavior change, will be designed to maximize adherence/compliance with the program. The SDEP manual will provide detailed instructions on exercises, such as repetitions, frequency, and required equipment, which can be implemented in the home environment. The basis for the exercise regimen is derived from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) sample home based exercise program available in handout form. The program provides instructions on exercises, repetitions or duration, frequency, and required equipment which can be implemented in the home environment.
Behavioral: Self-Directed Exercise Program
The full SDEP program, which will be developed by physical therapists, orthopaedic trauma surgeons, and investigators with experience in health behavior change, will be designed to maximize adherence/compliance with the program

No Intervention: Observational
Patients who are unwilling to be randomized will be enrolled in an observational arm of the study. They will be asked to complete all baseline and follow-up assessments, and participation in formal PT or SDEP will be documented.



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Return to work/major activities [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Measured through the rate of return to work/duty 12 months post discharge using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Quality of Life [ Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6 and12 months ]
    The PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0 assesses depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Raw scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating lower quality of life in that area, except for the sleep disturbance sub-section, where higher scores indicate better sleep.

  2. Kinesiophobia [ Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6 and12 months ]
    As measured by Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). The TSK is a self-completed questionnaire and the range of scores are from 17 to 68 where the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia

  3. Time to Radiographic Fracture Healing [ Time Frame: 3, 6 & 12 months ]
    Radiographs will be assessed for fracture healing.

  4. Muscle Strength [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Muscle strength will be measured using a dynamometer.

  5. Joint Range of Motion (ROM) [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Joint range of motion will be measured using a goniomenter.

  6. Resilience [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 & 12 months ]
    Resiliency will be measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Total Score of the resilience questions is 0 to 40, 10 subscales from 0 to 4 (summed up for total score), the higher the score the better the resilience



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-65 with operative fractures of the femur and tibia (to include distal femur (33A, B), plateau (41A, B), pilon (43A, B), and selected ankle injuries (44A, B)) presenting to the Orthopaedic Surgeon for either acute care or for the follow-up of care performed elsewhere (within 14 days of the injury).
  • All patients must be English or Spanish competent and able to be followed at the sites for at least 12 months following injury.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS)>18
  • Bilateral lower-extremity injuries that preclude crutch ambulation
  • Associated spine, pelvic, and/or acetabular fractures that otherwise alter weightbearing plan
  • Type III B/C open fractures
  • Glasgow Coma Scale <15 at time of discharge
  • Major peripheral nerve injury
  • Planned admission to a skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehabilitation facility
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients diagnosed with a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) will be excluded from the study.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04612478


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, North Carolina
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
United States, South Carolina
Greenville Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
Sponsors and Collaborators
Atrium Health
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Rachel Seymour, PhD Atrium Health
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Rachel Seymour, Atrium Health:
Informed Consent Form  [PDF] March 14, 2018

Publications:
Ferguson C, Harmer L, Seymour RB, Ellington K, Bosse MJ, and the CMC-OC Ankle Fracture Study Group. Does Physical Therapy Predict Outcomes after Ankle Fractures and Ankle Fracture-Dislocations? Podium Presentation, Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting, October 2015.

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Rachel Seymour, Principal Investigator, Atrium Health
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04612478    
Other Study ID Numbers: Pro00024283
First Posted: November 3, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: January 27, 2022
Last Verified: January 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No