Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Evaluating an Online Wellness Intervention for Indian College Students

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04592588
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : October 19, 2020
Last Update Posted : October 4, 2021
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Ashoka University
Jindal Global University
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of Pennsylvania

Brief Summary:

We are evaluating the effects of an online single-session mental health intervention (the Common Elements Toolbox; COMET). To evaluate COMET, we are conducting a randomized controlled trial with Indian college students. Students will be randomized to the COMET condition or to a wait-list control condition.

Primary outcome measures (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and subjective well-being) will be measures at two weeks post-intervention, four weeks post-intervention, and twelve weeks post-intervention.

We will evaluate COMET as a universal intervention (using the full sample) and as a targeted intervention (analyzing those who reported elevated depressive symptoms or anxiety symptoms at baseline).


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Depressive Symptoms Anxiety Happiness Behavioral: Common Elements Toolbox Behavioral: Wait-list control Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 513 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title: Online Wellness Activities for Indian College Students
Actual Study Start Date : October 19, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date : August 30, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 30, 2021

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Anxiety

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Common Elements Toolbox (COMET)
The Common Elements Toolbox is an online intervention consisting of modules from empirically supported treatments for common mental health problems.
Behavioral: Common Elements Toolbox
COMET is an online unguided self-help intervention that lasts approximately 45-60 minutes.

Sham Comparator: Wait-list control condition Behavioral: Wait-list control
Participants in the control condition will receive access to the intervention after data collection for the study has been completed.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]
    Depression questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate less depression.

  2. Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7 (GAD-7) [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]
    Anxiety questionnaire. Total scores range from 0-21. Lower scores indicate less anxiety.

  3. Change in the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]
    Subjective Well-being questionnaire. Total scores range from 7 to 35. Higher values indicate higher well-being scores.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Ratings on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention ]
    Questionnaire measuring the acceptability of an intervention. Acceptability refers to the perception that a given treatment is agreeable or satisfactory. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability ratings.

  2. Ratings on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention ]
    Questionnaire measuring the appropriateness of an intervention. Appropriateness refers to the perceived fit or relevance of an intervention. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate higher appropriateness.

  3. Mechanisms of Change [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]

    Participants answered questions relating to each module's mechanism of change on a 7-point Likert Scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".

    Specifically, we asked participants:

    How capable they feel about managing negative thoughts If they will intentionally spend time doing activities they enjoy If they will notice and appreciate good things


  4. Ability to Cope with COVID-19 [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]

    2 questions related to their ability to cope with stressors over the upcoming weeks (including challenges relating to COVID-19). Participants answered these questions on a 7-point Likert Scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Specifically, we asked participants:

    if they will be able to handle lifestyle changes due to the coronavirus, if the pandemic will have an extremely negative impact on their life.


  5. Secondary Control [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]

    We asked participants three items to assess secondary control (Weisz et al., 2010). The items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("Very false") to 3 ("Very true").

    The three items are:

    When something bad happens, I can find a way to think about it that makes me feel better.

    After a really hard day, I can make myself feel better by remembering some good things that happened.

    When bad things happen to me that I can't control, there are lots of things I can do to feel better.

    Higher scores indicate greater secondary control.


  6. Perceived Utility [ Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention ]

    Participants were asked to rate three items relating to the perceived utility of each module. Specifically, we asked participants:

    How helpful the module was How engaging the module was How much they will continue applying content from the module Higher scores indicate greater perceived utility.


  7. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]
    Questionnaire measuring positive affect and negative affect. Scores on the positive affect subscale range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Scores on the negative affect subscale range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect

  8. Perceived Stress Scale-4 [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]
    Questionnaire measuring perceived stress. Scores range from 0-16, with higher scores indicating greater stress.

  9. The Social Connectedness Scale [ Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention ]
    Questionnaire measuring social connectedness. Scores range from 8 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater social connectedness.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 99 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: At least 18 years old and a student at a participating university in India.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04592588


Locations
Layout table for location information
India
Ashoka University
New Delhi, India
Jindal Global University
Sonipat, India
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania
Ashoka University
Jindal Global University
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: University of Pennsylvania
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04592588    
Other Study ID Numbers: 843879
First Posted: October 19, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: October 4, 2021
Last Verified: October 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Depression
Behavioral Symptoms