Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique Verses Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise for Mechanical Neck Pain

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04545996
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 11, 2020
Last Update Posted : February 17, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Riphah International University

Brief Summary:
The aim of this research is to determine the Effects of Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique and Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise for Mechanical Neck Pain. A randomized control trail will conduct at Railway general hospital(IIMCT). The sample size will be 68. TheParticipants will bedividing into two groups,34 participants in Group A (receive the Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique) and 34 in Group B (receive Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise). The study duration will 6 months. Purposive non probability sampling technique will be applied. Both male and female participants with mechanical neck pain will be include. Tools use in this study areNumerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI),Goniometer, Pressure Biofeedback unit, Digital Camera. Data analyzed through SPSS version 21.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Cervical Pain Mechanical Neck Pain Other: Suboccipital Inhibition Technique Other: Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercises. Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is generalized neck or shoulder pain with mechanical characteristics (including symptoms provoked by neck postures, neck movement, or palpation of the cervical musculature). It has become an increasing problem causing functional disability in large populations. It is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in the neck region. Neck pain of mechanical origin constitutes approximately 45% - 50% of all neck pain. The variation in the prevalence ranges from 43.0% of the Swedish population, 34.4% of Norwegian adult population and In North America (Saskatchewan, Canada) lifetime prevalence of neck pain is 66.7%. The reason for this may lie in the increasing time spent on office and computer work. Also, a significant proportion of mechanical neck disorders consist of whiplash associated disorders (WAD), with a higher prevalence in women (22%) than in men (16%). Strong evidence suggests biomechanical factors, including prolonged computer use, and posture and repetitive movements are associated with the development of neck pain. Cervical joint dysfunction is the main cause of mechanical neck pain. One of the predominant mechanical events causing neck pain, is impaired stability of the cervical spine, which is often attributed to disturbances in motor control over the cervical spine. The stability of the cervical spine is dependent on the deep neck flexor and neck extensor muscles. The longuscolli and capitis are principal deep neck flexor muscles. In contrast, the suboccipital muscles are principal neck extensors of the upper cervical spine and are composed of the rectus capitis posterior major (RCPM), rectus capitis posterior minor (RCPm), obliquuscapitis superior (OCS), and obliquuscapitis inferior (OCI). There are varieties of physiotherapy interventions for the management of Mechanical neck pain such as spinal joint manipulation, mobilization techniques, massage techniques, suboccipital muscle inhibition technique, craniocervical flexion exercise, soft tissue techniques and trigger point [TrP] treatment , needling, active release techniques, stretches (static and isometric ), traction and various electro modalities.A very limited evidence found on comparison on effectiveness of sub occipital muscle release and Cranio-cervical flexion exercise. Previous studies only find out immediate effect (one session) on Cervical ROM and CVA. To fill the gap, this study is formulated to determine the effects of sub occipital muscle release and Cranio-cervical flexion exercise on ROM in the cervical spine and Cranio-vertebral angle (CVA) in mechanical neck pain. Study will find out most effective treatment for management of mechanical neck pain and would contribute to educate and treat the patient with most simple and effective treatment approach.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 68 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Effects of Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique and Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise for Mechanical Neck Pain
Actual Study Start Date : January 11, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date : October 30, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date : October 30, 2020

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Cervical Rang of Motion Exercises.
Cervical exercises for mechanical neck pain.
Other: Suboccipital Inhibition Technique
Suboccipital Inhibition Technique For 2min And Conventional Treatment Hot Pack For 10 To 15 Mints And Muscle Energy Technique(Post Facilitation Stretch) 5 Reps × 1 Set Sessions: 2 TIME A WEEK FOR 4 CONSECUTIVE WEEKS

Experimental: Cervical Exercises.
Cervical exercises for the management of mechanical neck pain.
Other: Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercises.
Cranio cervical flexion exercises10 repetitions for 10 seconds and conventional treatment hot pack for 10 to 15 mints and muscle energy technique(post facilitation stretch) 5 reps × 1 set Sessions: 2 TIME A WEEK FOR 4 CONSECUTIVE WEEKS




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Neck disability index [ Time Frame: 4th day. ]
    Changes from base line Northwick disability index was developed first in Northwick Park hospital, England. It was designed to measure the neck pain and disability over time. It consists of 10, five parts sections. At the end, score is calculated by dividing the obtained score by total (50) multiplied by 100.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Numeric Pain Rating scale. [ Time Frame: 4th day ]
    Changes from base Line Numeric Pain rating scale is a scale for pain starting from 0-10. Where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate severe pain.

  2. Cranio vertebral angle [ Time Frame: 4th day ]
    Changes from the Baseline Cranio vertebral angle will taken with the help of digital camera.

  3. Rang of Motion of cervical spine. [ Time Frame: 4th day ]
    Changes from the Baseline range of Motion of cervical spine willtake with the Help of Goniometer.

  4. Cervical flexion exercise. [ Time Frame: 4th day ]
    Changes from the Baseline cervical flexion exercise will access by pressure biofeedback unit.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   15 Years to 35 Years   (Child, Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least five points on the neck disability index (NDI)
  • 3 to 6 points in the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS)
  • pain from more than 3 months
  • Subjects were included if they had FHP as determined by the presence of a CVA < 48
  • Subjects will include if they have flexion <80°, extension<70°, lateral flexion <20° and rotation <90

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of traffic accidents
  • History of lower extremity fracture and surgery
  • Acute low back and neck pain
  • History of lumbar and cervical herniated intervertebral disk and spinal stenosis
  • History of cervical spine surgery and trauma
  • History of vascular disease in the head and neck
  • Progressive neuro logical deficits

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04545996


Locations
Layout table for location information
Pakistan
Pakistan Railway General Hospital.
Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46000
Sponsors and Collaborators
Riphah International University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Lal Gul Khan, MScPT Riphah International University
Publications:
Camitsis A. The effect of craniocervical flexion exercise on cervical posture and cervical range of motion in asymptomatic participants.

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Riphah International University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04545996    
Other Study ID Numbers: REC/00682 Robina Malik
First Posted: September 11, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 17, 2021
Last Verified: February 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Riphah International University:
Sub-Occipital Muscles Inhibition Technique
Cranio Cervical Flexion Exercise
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Neck Pain
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations