Clinical Evaluation of HPT Treated Rigid Contact Lenses Made From Hexafocon A
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04525170 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Withdrawn
(It was decided by the sponsor to not proceed.)
First Posted : August 25, 2020
Last Update Posted : August 25, 2020
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Ametropia | Device: HPT treatment Device: untreated | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 0 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Clinical Evaluation of Hydra-PEG (Polyethylene Glycol) Treatment (HPT) Treated Rigid Contact Lenses Made From Hexafocon A |
| Actual Study Start Date : | September 2015 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | December 2015 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | December 2015 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HPT treated
daily wear Hexafocon A rigid contact lens treated with Hydra PEG surface coating
|
Device: HPT treatment
Other Name: Hydra-PEG (Polyethylene Glycol) Treatment |
|
Experimental: untreated
daily wear Hexafocon A rigid contact lens
|
Device: untreated |
- questionnaire addressing subjective comfort and wear time [ Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month ]Subjects rated on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 was 'poor' and 10 was 'excellent'.
- limbal redness - ocular biomicroscopy [ Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month ]Findings were graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.
- corneal staining - ocular biomicroscopy [ Time Frame: subjects will be followed-up for one month ]Findings were graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willing and able to sign the informed consent form
- Aged ≥18 years old
- Experienced wearer of rigid gas permeable contact lenses
- Subject's habitual contact lenses must be made of Boston XO (hexafocon A) material
- Subjects must have owned spectacles or contact lenses prior to enrolment for this trial
- Spherical power between -10.00 D and +10.00 D (at vertex distance 0 mm)
- Corneal astigmatism ≤2.00 D
Exclusion Criteria:
- Eye injury or surgery within 3 months immediately prior to enrolment for this trial
- Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting
- Currently enrolled in an ophthalmic clinical trial
- Evidence of systemic or ocular abnormality, infection or disease which is likely to affect successful wear of contact lenses or use of the accessory solutions, as determined by the investigator
- Any use of medications for which contact lens wear could be contradicted, as determined by the investigator
- Current extended-wear users (sleep-in overnight)
- Current monovision lens wearers
- Current wearers of multifocal contact lenses
- Current wearers of toric contact lenses (front surface design)
- Current wearers of astigmatic contact lenses (posterior surface design)
- Has a reported "Strong" comfort or vision preference between each eye with their habitual RGP lenses
- Unacceptable fit of habitual lenses
- Pregnant women and nursing mothers
- Best-corrected visual acuity worse than 6/9 (LogMAR: +0.20; Snellen decimal: 0.63)
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04525170
| Germany | |
| Hartwig Research Center | |
| Heikendorf, S-H, Germany, 24226 | |
| Siehste | |
| Kassel, Germany | |
| Principal Investigator: | Andreas Hartwig, PhD | Hartwig Research Center |
| Responsible Party: | Contamac Ltd |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04525170 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
CM-002-002 |
| First Posted: | August 25, 2020 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | August 25, 2020 |
| Last Verified: | August 2020 |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Refractive Errors Eye Diseases |

