Single Trans-sacral Screw Versus Two Iliosacral Screws
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03944174 |
|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified May 2019 by Mohammed Elhady Hassan Mohammed Ali, Assiut University.
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
First Posted : May 9, 2019
Last Update Posted : May 10, 2019
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
- To compare Single Trans-sacral screw fixation vs. two Ilio-Sacral screws fixation as regard time for starting weight bearing.
- To compare between functional outcome using the Majeed Pelvic Score.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Pelvic Fracture | Procedure: Fixation of unstable pelvic fractures |
Sacroiliac screws (SISs) have been used since Vidal et al introduced them in 1973. Since that, SIS fixation has become a common technology in fixing pelvic posterior ring injuries with important progress in the past 20 years. Currently, SIS fixation represents the only minimally invasive technique to stabilize the posterior pelvic ring. For that reason, it is steadily gaining popularity, becoming one of the most commonly used techniques. The sacrum, serving as the foundation of the spine, transmits the stress between spine and pelvis through sacroiliac joints. Thus, the goal of surgical fixation is the reconstruction of the spino-pelvic-junction to allow early weight-bearing and to facilitate nursing care, particularly for multiple injured patients.
As a result of the deforming forces acting perpendicular to the implant axis, routine ilio-sacral screws fixation may not provide adequate stabilization, especially in certain unstable injuries. Longer trans-sacral screws that traverse the entire upper sacrum and exit the contralateral iliac cortex may improve holding power and also stabilize concomitant contralateral posterior pelvic injuries. These trans-sacral screws are reliably safe to insert using routine intraoperative fluoroscopy, and they provide durable fixation.
| Study Type : | Observational |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 60 participants |
| Observational Model: | Cohort |
| Time Perspective: | Prospective |
| Official Title: | Comparative Study Between Single Trans-sacral Screw Versus Two Iliosacral Screws in Fixation of Unstable Pelvic Fractures |
| Estimated Study Start Date : | June 2019 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | February 2020 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | June 2020 |
| Group/Cohort | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Single Trans-sacral Screw |
Procedure: Fixation of unstable pelvic fractures
Percutaneous fixation of both iliac bones through the sacrum using one screw |
| Two Iliosacral Screws |
Procedure: Fixation of unstable pelvic fractures
Percutaneous fixation of both iliac bones through the sacrum using one screw |
- Early painless weight bearing as tolerated measured by Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS). [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]Assessment the ability of the patient to start weight bearing without pain as soon as possible by the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS). It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal or vertical line, numbered from 0 to 10 and anchored by 2 verbal descriptors "no pain and worst imaginable pain" one for each symptom extreme from which the patient shall select the degree of pain varying from no pain to worst imaginable pain.
- To measure the functional outcome using Majeed Pelvic Score system [ Time Frame: 6 weeks and 6 months ]To assess the effect of the procedure on the daily activities of the patient after pelvic fractures. A system for assessment of function after major pelvic injuries is proposed. This numerical system developed from a five-year prospective study of 60 patients. Five factors were assessed and scored: pain, standing, sitting, sexual intercourse and work performance. The total score then gave a clinical grade as excellent, good, fair or poor. The scoring system allows comparison between early and late results and also between various methods of treatment.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 60 Years (Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Unstable pelvic fractures Tile type B & C.
- Sacral Fractures.
- Recent trauma: less than 1 week from date of trauma.
- Neurologically free.
- Injury Severity Score (ISS) < 18.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Spino-pelvic dissociation.
- Comminuted fractures
- Bilat. Sacral fractures.
- Sacral insufficiency.
- Patients with associated comorbidities "eg. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus , chronic renal failure, etc.".
| Responsible Party: | Mohammed Elhady Hassan Mohammed Ali, Physician, Assiut University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03944174 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
Trans-sacral screw fixation |
| First Posted: | May 9, 2019 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | May 10, 2019 |
| Last Verified: | May 2019 |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Hip Fractures Fractures, Bone Wounds and Injuries |
Femoral Fractures Hip Injuries Leg Injuries |

