Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Ventilatory Adaptation to Concentric Versus Eccentric Exercise in Patients With Severe COPD (CONvEX)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03923660
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified September 2018 by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon.
Recruitment status was:  Active, not recruiting
First Posted : April 22, 2019
Last Update Posted : April 22, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Brief Summary:

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) based on concentric exercise training has become an integral component in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), improving functional capacities while diminishing symptoms and improving quality of life.

However, the response to concentric exercise training is heterogeneous from one COPD patient to another. The inability of some COPD patients to achieve the exercise intensities required to stress limb muscles due to severe ventilatory limitation could partially explain their poor response to training.

Endurance exercise with eccentric muscle contractions could be an interesting alternative to concentric exercise because it produces greater muscle force through its lower metabolic cost. Eccentric exercise could allow patients with severe airflow limitation to perform prolonged exercise sessions with sufficient intensity to improve muscle function.

Nevertheless, a recent study performed in healthy young subjects reported that eccentric exercise induced a more hyperpneic breathing pattern (i.e., lower tidal volume and higher breathing frequency) that concentric for a given minute ventilation.

The main objective of CONvEX study is to compare ventilatory adaptation between two modalities of exercise performed on cycle ergometer (concentric versus eccentric) in severe COPD patients.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severe Other: Incremental Concentric-eccentric exercise test Other: Incremental Eccentric-concentric exercise test Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) based on concentric exercise training has become an integral component in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), improving functional capacities while diminishing symptoms and improving quality of life.

However, the response to concentric exercise training is heterogeneous from one COPD patient to another. The inability of some COPD patients to achieve the exercise intensities required to stress limb muscles due to severe ventilatory limitation could partially explain their poor response to training.

Endurance exercise with eccentric muscle contractions could be an interesting alternative to concentric exercise because it produces greater muscle force through its lower metabolic cost. Eccentric exercise could allow patients with severe airflow limitation to perform prolonged exercise sessions with sufficient intensity to improve muscle function.

Nevertheless, a recent study performed in healthy young subjects reported that eccentric exercise induced a more hyperpneic breathing pattern (i.e., lower tidal volume and higher breathing frequency) that concentric for a given minute ventilation.

The main objective of CONvEX study is to compare ventilatory adaptation between two modalities of exercise performed on cycle ergometer (concentric versus eccentric) in severe COPD patients.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 20 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Ventilatory Adaptation to Concentric Versus Eccentric Exercise in Patients With Severe COPD
Actual Study Start Date : September 20, 2018
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 2019
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 2019

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Concentric-eccentric
Concentric-eccentric
Other: Incremental Concentric-eccentric exercise test
Patients will perform incremental exercise test on semi recumbent eccentric ergometer

Experimental: Eccentric-concentric
Eccentric-concentric
Other: Incremental Eccentric-concentric exercise test
Patients will perform incremental exercise test on semi recumbent concentric ergometer




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Ventilatory adaptation [ Time Frame: week 1 ]
    Breathing frequency/tidal volume ratio at the maximum common minute ventilation.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Dynamic hyperinflation [ Time Frame: week 1 ]
    Dynamic hyperinflation will be assessed through iterative inspiratory capacity (IC) measurment during exercise. A decrease in IC >150 mL compared to resting levels at any time point during exercise will be considered as dynamic hyperinflation.

  2. Brachial muscle enrollment [ Time Frame: week 1 ]
    2.4 GHz electromyographic activity of biceps brachii recorded using surface electrod (Cometa Wave Plus wireless EMG)

  3. Quadriceps muscle enrollment [ Time Frame: week 1 ]
    2.4 GHz electromyographic activity of vastus lateralis recorded using surface electrod (Cometa Wave Plus wireless EMG)

  4. Ventilatory efficiency [ Time Frame: week 1 ]
    Dead volume/Tidal volume ratio

  5. Ventilatory efficiency [ Time Frame: week 1 ]
    Minute ventilation/Carbon dioxide production ratio

  6. Tolerance [ Time Frame: week 1 ]
    Borg modified scale [ranging from 0 to 10] for dyspnoea 0 indicates no dyspnoea and 10 the maximum dyspnoea



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   40 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe COPD (FEV1 [forced expiratory volume in 1 second] / FVC [forced vital capacity] < 70% et FEV1 < 50%)
  • Informed consent
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Effort oxygen therapy
  • Cardiovascular, neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders that can provide significant dyspnea or limit exercise
  • Legal incapacity
  • Low or no cooperation anticipated

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03923660


Locations
Layout table for location information
France
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, France, 25000
Sponsors and Collaborators
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03923660    
Other Study ID Numbers: P/2018/374
First Posted: April 22, 2019    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: April 22, 2019
Last Verified: September 2018

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon:
COPD
breathing pattern
exercise
concentric
eccentric
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Lung Diseases
Respiratory Tract Diseases