Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Use of Lumbar Motion Monitor to Predict Response to Radiofrequency Ablation After Medial Branch Diagnostic Blocks

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03894319
Recruitment Status : Withdrawn (Insufficient staff for measurement assessments)
First Posted : March 28, 2019
Last Update Posted : February 23, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
JayeshVallabh, Ohio State University

Brief Summary:
The study is being performed to determine if adding an objective measurement of back function can assess the success of a commonly performed back injection procedure-lumbar medial branch blocks. Researchers also hope to compare whether those who have objective improvements after lumbar medial branch blocks will also have more successful lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation.

Condition or disease
Back Pain

Detailed Description:

The current standard of care to determine the success of lumbar medical branch block(s) (MBB) is highly subjective, even if clinicians were to use validated questionairres. Currently, there are no studies that use a validated objective functional outcome measure to practically and efficiently assess lumbar MBB success prior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The addition of a validated objective measure of functional impairment to the current standard of care may help us improve in identifying the patients that will benefit from lumbar RFA. It has the potential to minimize procedures of limited benefit with a significant impact on containing healthcare spending. Additionally, it may further knowledge on how to appropriately select patients without relying on the stringent double block diagnostic technique put forth by the CMS that may exclude patients who could greatly benefit from a lumbar RFA.

As the objective measure the study will use a lumber motion monitor (LMM). The LMM weighs less than 5 pounds and fits on with a shoulder harness and belt. The LMM measures motion in all three directions (forward back, side to side, and twisting) just like the spine. The LMM testing may take up to 30 minutes depending on how many tasks can be performed by the participant and how many practice trials are required. The LMM testing includes bending forward and back to upright as fast as possible; comfortably while maintaining a twist position.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 0 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Use of Lumbar Motion Monitor (LMM) as a Prognostic Tool to Predict Response to Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation After Medial Branch Diagnostic Blocks
Actual Study Start Date : June 6, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date : February 19, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date : February 19, 2021



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in functional performance probability P(n). [ Time Frame: collected at time points Day 1; Weeks 2,4, and 6; and Months 3,6, and 9 ]
    The Lumbar Motion Monitor (LMM) is an objective, validated, reproducible and accurate tool to rapidly assess the degree of impairment with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 97%, respectively. This device provides a functional measure of trunk range of motion, flexion velocity, extension velocity, flexion acceleration, extension acceleration and compares recordings to a normative database. The LMM is able to provide an overall impairment score known as a "functional performance probability(P(n)).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Numeric Rating Scale for Pain [ Time Frame: collected at time points Day 1; Weeks 2,4, and 6; and Months 3,6, and 9 ]
    Validated as a measure of pain. Widely used and mandated through the Department of Veterans Affairs as a pain assessment tool.Use of the NRS for MBB and RFA success is the current post procedure assessment standard of care and widely used nationally and within the Ohio State Spine Center clinics.

  2. PROMIS 29 [ Time Frame: collected at time points Day 1; Weeks 2,4, and 6; and Months 3,6, and 9 ]
    The PROMIS® 29 Profile v. 2.0 contains 29 items from 8 domains-Physical Function, Depression, Anxiety, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity. These PROMIS® Physical Function measures have been validated for the assessment of back pain.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   20 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Adult patients at the Ohio State Comprehensive Spine Center scheduled to undergo lumbar medial branch blockade and possible subsequent radiofrequency ablation.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, 20 years of age to 70 years of age
  • Capable and willing to consent
  • Participants literate in English language
  • Patients with predominately bilateral axial pain and clinical suspicion of lumbar facet pain.
  • Patients who have completed conservative care: physical therapy (PT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of drug abuse/ dependency
  • History of prior lumbar medial branch block or medial branch radiofrequency ablation
  • Changes to analgesic regimen in the last 30 days
  • Allergy to lidocaine or bupivacaine local anesthetic
  • Illiteracy (English)
  • Presence of a clinically diagnosed major psychiatric condition such as bipolar disorder, uncontrolled major depression, schizophrenia
  • Predominately radicular pain.
  • Patient reported limb pain greater than axial low back pain
  • Previous lumbar spine surgery
  • Any condition that the principle investigator may disqualify the patient
  • Pregnancy

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03894319


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Ohio
The Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
Sponsors and Collaborators
Ohio State University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Jayesh Vallabh, MD Ohio State University
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: JayeshVallabh, Assistant Professor- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Ohio State University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03894319    
Other Study ID Numbers: 2018H0197
First Posted: March 28, 2019    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 23, 2021
Last Verified: February 2021

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Back Pain
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations