Post Stroke Intensive Rehabilitation (PSR)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03866057 |
|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified May 2019 by Francesca Cecchi, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : March 7, 2019
Last Update Posted : May 24, 2019
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease |
|---|
| Stroke Rehabilitation |
Despite progress in the treatment of cerebrovascular diseases in the acute phase, stroke remains a catastrophic event with important public health implications. Post-acute intensive rehabilitation is recommended in patients with neurological deficits, but standardized evaluation protocols are essential for evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation and for the early identification of prognostic factors of recovery. The search for biomarkers of response to specific treatments aimed to customizing the intervention. Recent studies highlight the importance of neurophysiological markers as predictors of post-stroke epilepsy onset and prognosis. Also genetic substrate and epigenetic mechanisms have a prognostic role; the latter may be modified by the administration of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) drugs, largely prescribed according to guidelines in post-stroke depression, confirming the neurotrophic role of these drugs postulated in many studies but never demonstrated in vivo in humans. Specific physiotherapeutic interventions also seem to stimulate optimal functional recovery and brain neuroplasticity, in particular those based on the intensive repetition of tasks, such as robotics and Mirror Therapy. Given that the mechanisms of neuronal plasticity activated by these interventions are presumably different, it is hypothesizable that there are specific predictors of response for each of them.
The primary endpoint of this study is to identify clinical, instrumental and genetic predictors of functional recovery in hospitalized patients undergoing intensive rehabilitation after stroke, evaluated with standardized protocol. Recovery will be assessed at discharge and at follow-up after 6 months.
Secondary endpoints are:
- evaluate the development of post-stroke epilepsy according to the presence of early clinical seizures or electroencephalographic (EEG) anomalies identified at admission to rehabilitation;
- demonstrate in vivo the activation of neuroplasticity by serotonin reuptake inhibitors drugs;
- evaluate in patients with hemiplegia / hemiparesis of upper limb undergoing Mirror Therapy, robotic rehabilitation and traditional physiotherapy, the presence of specific factors predictive of functional recovery, and of response to different treatments.
| Study Type : | Observational |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 270 participants |
| Observational Model: | Cohort |
| Time Perspective: | Prospective |
| Official Title: | Post Stroke Intensive Rehabilitation: Predictors of Outcome and Response to Specific Interventions |
| Actual Study Start Date : | March 1, 2019 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | December 31, 2019 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 31, 2020 |
| Group/Cohort |
|---|
|
1 study group
All patients hospitalized in 4 intensive rehabilitation Structures of Don Gnocchi Foundation during the enrollment period, suffering from acute (within 30 days) ischemic or emorragic stroke
|
- change in Modified Barthel Index (mBI) [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Functional recovery; Score from 0 to 100; higher values represent a better outcome.
- change in Modified Rankin score [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge,up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Functional recovery; Score from 0 to 6; higher values represent a worse outcome.
- change in Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMA) [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge,up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Sensomotor recovery; Total score from 0 to 64, Upper-limb subscale 0-36; lower-limb subscale 0-28. Higher values represent a better outcome.
- change in communication ability (Scala di disabilità comunicativa -SDC) [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Communication recovery; Score from 0 to 4; higher values represent a better outcome.
- change in Oxford Cognitive Score (OCS) [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) describes the cognitive deficits after stroke.The scale consists of 10 tasks encompassing five cognitive domains: attention and executive function, language, memory, number processing, and praxis.
- change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]depression and anxiety; Score from 0 to 21, subitems Depression and Anxiety. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
- change in Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Walking recovery; Score from 0 to 5. Higher values represent a better outcome.
- change in Trunk Control Test (TCT) [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Trunk control recovery; Score from 0 to 100;Higher values represent a better outcome.
- change in Numeric Rating Score (NRS) -Pain [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Pain assessment; Score from 0 to 10; Higher values represent a worse outcome.
- change in Ashworth spasticity scale [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Spasticity; Score from 0 to 4; Higher values represent a worse outcome.
- change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]clinical recovery; 15 items scored from 3 to 4 ( total score from 0 to 42). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
- Post Stroke Epilepsy [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]We will report possible post stroke seizures.
- change in serum Brain Derived Neurotrophic factor (BDNF) epigenetic profile [ Time Frame: Admission: Time 0; Discharge, up to 3/4 weeks: Time 1; 6-months Follow up: Time 2 ]Neural plasticity
Biospecimen Retention: Samples With DNA
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Inclusion criteria:
- age 18-90
- acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (within 30 days)
- consent to participate and to anonymous processing of data.
Additional inclusion criteria for Sub-project Neurophysiological Markers:
-signing of informed consent for the participation in the sub-project.
Additional inclusion criteria for Epigenetic subproject:
-signing of informed consent for participation in the subproject.
Exclusion Criteria:
-Stroke occurred more than 30 days after the transfer to intensive rehabilitation
Additional exclusion criteria for Epigenetic subproject (for retrospective analysis):
- history of major psychiatric disorder or recent exacerbation
- global aphasia
- refusal of the patient to participate in the study.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03866057
| Contact: Francesca Cecchi, Physician | 05573931 | fcecchi@dongnocchi.it |
| Italy | |
| Fondazione don Gnocchi | Recruiting |
| Florence, Italy, 50143 | |
| Contact: Francesca Cecchi, Physician 05573931 fcecchi@dongnocchi.it | |
| Principal Investigator: | Francesca Cecchi, Physician | IRCCS Don Carlo Gnocchi |
| Responsible Party: | Francesca Cecchi, Principal Investigator, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03866057 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
FDG_STROKE |
| First Posted: | March 7, 2019 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | May 24, 2019 |
| Last Verified: | May 2019 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Stroke Predictors of recovery Neurological Rehabilitation Genetic |
Epigenetic Mirror Therapy Neurophysiopathology |
|
Stroke Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |
Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |

