Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Emotional Information Processing in Attention Deficit Disorder With or Without Hyperactivity (TIVE-TDA)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03861585
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 4, 2019
Last Update Posted : May 15, 2020
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Fondation Lenval

Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to analyse explicit and implicit emotional information processing abilities in children with attention deficit disorder with or without hyperactivity

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity Attention Deficit Disorder Without Hyperactivity Other: Semantic group Other: Emotional group Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
The main symptoms of Attentional Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are inattention, motor agitation and impulsivity. However, other dysfunctions affecting the quality of life remain poorly studied: lack of understanding and management of emotions, focus on the local aspects of a visual scene limiting the ability to assign a general meaning to the scene and alteration of long-term memory encoding. This study aims to analyse these difficulties using different tasks requiring processing of rich and varied everyday images, having high ecological validity. It involves the participation of 56 boys and girls with ADHD, aged 7 to 12 years. A first phase examines the immediate understanding of images using two tasks: semantic categorization (Experiment 1) and emotional evaluation (Experiment 2) of images with positive, negative or neutral emotional valence, and depicting real environments (natural vs. manufactured contexts) or foreground objects pasted into a noise background (inanimate objects vs. animals vs. people. In each trial, one context image and one object image are presented briefly and simultaneously, one in each visual field. In order to be appropriately understood in both their semantic and emotional contents, context images will require more global processing, while object images will require more local, detailed processing. Their semantic (Exp. 1) and emotional (Exp. 2) consistency is manipulated. A week later, the participants have to perform a memory task requiring old/new recognition in a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) paradigm that presents in each trial a pair of images (one old, one new) having the same emotional valence (Exp. 3). The study will characterize the specificities of processing and representing visual emotional information in ADHD children. The results will be compared with those from a previous study we conducted with the same methodology on neuro-typical children (controls).

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 54 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Official Title: Attentional and Emotional Processing of Complex Visual Scenes in Children With Attention Deficit Disorder With or Without Hyperactivity
Actual Study Start Date : March 15, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 11, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date : March 11, 2020

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: semantic group
Half of the participants (named the "semantic group") perform a semantic categorisation task.
Other: Semantic group
The "semantic task" has to categorise semantically (i.e., type of contexts or type of objects) one image at each trial.

Experimental: emotional group
Half of the participants (named the "emotional group") perform an emotional evaluation task.
Other: Emotional group
The "emotional task" has to evaluate the emotional content (i.e., neutral, positive or negative) of one image at each trial.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. 1. Accuracy and response time at an explicit emotional evaluation task of visual scenes, by children with Attentional Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [ Time Frame: at baseline Day 0 ]
    The performance at the emotional evaluation task is analyzed by association of two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time at the correct trials (in milliseconds). This experiment analyzed the explicit processing of visual scenes' emotional content .

  2. 2. Accuracy and response time at a semantic categorization task of visual scenes, by children with Attentional Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [ Time Frame: at baseline Day 0 ]
    The performance at the semantic categorization task is analyzed by association of two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time at the correct trials (in milliseconds). This experiment analyzed the implicit processing of visual scenes' emotional content .


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Proportion and response time of correct response for the contextual images compared to the local images at the semantic categorization task for ADHD's participants [ Time Frame: at baseline Day 0 ]
    The performance is analyzed by association of two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time at the correct trials (in milliseconds).

  2. Proportion and response time of correct response for the contextual images compared to the local images at the emotional evaluation task for ADHD's participants [ Time Frame: at baseline Day 0 ]
    The performance is analyzed by association of two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time at the correct trials (in milliseconds).

  3. Influence of the image's emotional content (i.e. neutral, positive or negative) on long term memory in ADHD participants [ Time Frame: at 1 week from the first evaluation ]
    The performance, in a two-alternative forced choice (2 AFC) image recognition, is analyzed by two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time (in milliseconds).

  4. Performance on long term memory in ADHD participants [ Time Frame: at 1 week from the first evaluation ]
    The performance, in a two-alternative forced choice (2 AFC) image recognition, is analyzed by two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time (in milliseconds).



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   7 Years to 12 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children between 7 and 12 years old…………………………….
  • Normal or corrected visual acuity ……………………………….
  • ADHD diagnostic given by a doctor according to DSM 5 criteria (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)
  • Free from drug treatment until 24 hours before the experiment session……………………….
  • Affiliation to a social security system…………………….
  • Signature of the authorization documents from one parent or the holder of parental authority

Exclusion Criteria:

-History of neurological troubles, dysphasia, autistic spectrum disorder, intellectual disabilities


Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03861585


Locations
Layout table for location information
France
Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval
Nice, France
Sponsors and Collaborators
Fondation Lenval
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: FOSSOUD Catherine, MD Fondation Lenval - Nice Children Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Fondation Lenval
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03861585    
Other Study ID Numbers: 18-HPNCL-07
First Posted: March 4, 2019    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: May 15, 2020
Last Verified: May 2019

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Hyperkinesis
Disease
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Pathologic Processes
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Mental Disorders
Dyskinesias
Neurologic Manifestations
Nervous System Diseases