Effects of PEEP on Parameters of Tissue Perfusion in Patients Post Cardiac Surgery
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03753022 |
|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified November 2018 by Solange Guizilini, Federal University of São Paulo.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : November 26, 2018
Last Update Posted : November 29, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Pulmonary dysfunction is a condition inherent in cardiac surgery because of various interventions, such as general anesthesia, a median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass and establishment of internal thoracic artery dissection.
In situations when there is a deterioration in oxygenation, increased positive pressure on the airways end pressure (PEEP) can be used as therapeutic mode by reversing severe hypoxemia resulting pulmonary shunt. But the use of PEEP has been associated to reduced cardiac output, due mainly to decrease systemic venous return consequent to increased intrathoracic pressure, and thus might reduce tissue oxygenation. Moreover, the increased transpulmonary gradient may also impair right ventricular ejection exacerbating the hemodynamic consequences in some patients, which in clinical practice this diagnosis may be difficult to perform.
In hypovolemic patients or those with cardiac changes may become even more pronounced, resulting in accentuation of low flow and systemic hypotension entailing changes in markers of tissue perfusion commonly measured by venous saturation central difference venoarterial carbon dioxide and lactate. The hypothesis of the investigators is that PEEP of 10 cmH2O and 15 cmH2O can be applied to reverse lung damage in patients in the immediate postoperative myocardial revascularization without repercussion tissue importantly in markers of tissue perfusion.
The objective is to evaluate the effects of different optimization levels of PEEP on gas exchange and influences the tissue perfusion after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Acute Lung Injury | Other: Group G5 Other: Group G10 Other: Group G15 | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 125 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Sequential Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | The study was planned in 3 groups. Group G5 (control group: no changes will be made to the value of PEEP). Group G10 [after 30 minutes of admission (time 0) the PEEP will be raised to 10 cmH2O (time1) for 30 minutes and then returned to 5 cm H2O (time 2)]. Group G15 [after 30 minutes of admission (time 0) the PEEP will be raised to 15 cmH2O (time 1) for 30 minutes and then returned to 5 cm H2O (time 2)]. |
| Masking: | Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Effects of PEEP on Parameters of Tissue Perfusion and Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery - a Randomized Clinical Trial |
| Actual Study Start Date : | January 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | December 2019 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 2019 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Group G5
Patients submitted to CABG and peep 5
|
Other: Group G5
Submitted to peep 5 |
|
Experimental: Group G10
Patients submitted to CABG and peep 10
|
Other: Group G10
Submitted to peep 10 |
|
Experimental: Group G15
Patients submitted to CABG and peep 15
|
Other: Group G15
Submitted to peep 15 |
- Pulmonary events [ Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 24 hours after surgery ]Pleural effusion was considered relevant when exceeding the phrenicocostal angle and fluid drainage was monitored hourly. Atelectasis was acknowledged when a clear atelectasis radiologic shadow exceeded 15 mm in width, with linear atelectasis
- Arterial oxygenation [ Time Frame: Immediately after arrival at the intensive care unit until the end of protocol (around 5 hours) ]arterial blood gas measurements (partial pressure of arterial oxygen [PaO2]
- Tissue oxygenation [ Time Frame: Immediately after arrival at the intensive care unit until the end of protocol (around 5 hours) ](central venous oxygen saturation , arterial blood lactate and venoarterial CO2 difference
- Length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay [ Time Frame: From the day of surgery up to ICU discharge, maximum censoring at day 28 after surgery ] ]Days since surgery until ICU discharge
- Length of Hospital Stay [ Time Frame: From the day of surgery up to Hospital discharge, maximum censoring at day 28 after surgery ] ]Days since surgery until Hospital discharge
- Duration of mechanical ventilation [ Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 24 hours after surgery ]Hours since surgery until extubation
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- elective and isolated CABG, ejection fraction greater than 40%
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary disease, emergency surgery and mechanical ventilation prior to surgery.
Postoperative patients who had radiological abnormalities suggestive of pneumothorax, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, electrical ischemic changes on ECG, pulse pressure variation of more than 13, hemodynamic instability characterized by mean arterial pressure less than 60 mmHg, nor epinephrine greater than 0.5 mcg/Kg/ min and the presence of increased bleeding through the drains (greater than 2 ml \ kg \ h) the protocol was discontinued and the patient excluded from the study.
| Responsible Party: | Solange Guizilini, Principal Investigator, Federal University of São Paulo |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03753022 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
89704818.6.0000.5505 |
| First Posted: | November 26, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | November 29, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | November 2018 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Acute Lung Injury postoperative of cardiac surgery |
|
Lung Injury Acute Lung Injury Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Disease Myocardial Ischemia Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Thoracic Injuries Wounds and Injuries |

