Don't get left behind! The modernized ClinicalTrials.gov is coming. Check it out now.
Say goodbye to ClinicalTrials.gov!
The new site is coming soon - go to the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

ACURATE IDE: Safety and Effectiveness Study of ACURATE Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03735667
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : November 8, 2018
Last Update Posted : June 7, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Boston Scientific Corporation

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the ACURATE Transfemoral Aortic Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in subjects with severe native aortic stenosis who are indicated for TAVR.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Aortic Stenosis Device: ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR System Device: Medtronic CoreValve TAVR System Device: Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR System Device: ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR System XL Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Subjects will be enrolled at up to 85 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. There will be up to 2,820 subjects in ACURATE IDE.

The ACURATE IDE study cohorts include the following.

  • Main Randomized Cohort: A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial (RCT; ACURATE versus a commercially available balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3™ Transcatheter Heart Valve or future iteration [SAPIEN 3; Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA] or a commercially available self-expanding CoreValve® Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System, CoreValve® Evolut™ R Recapturable TAVR System, EVOLUT™ PRO System, or future iteration [CoreValve; Medtronic, Inc., Dublin, Ireland]). There will be up to 1,500 subjects in the RCT.
  • Roll-In Cohort: A non-randomized roll-in phase with the test device. Centers that do not have implantation experience with the ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis (transfemoral delivery; Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA) will perform at least 2 roll-in cases before commencing treatment in the randomized cohort. Centers with prior experience with ACURATE are not required to do roll-in cases. Data from roll-in subjects will be summarized separately from the randomized cohort and will not be included in the primary endpoint analysis.
  • 4D CT Imaging Substudy: Selected centers with the ability to perform high quality 4D computer tomography (CT) scans will include subjects in a 4D CT Imaging Substudy to assess the prevalence of reduced leaflet mobility and hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and the relationship, if any, to clinical events. Subjects will be randomized to test (ACURATE) and control device.
  • ACURATE Prime™ XL Nested Registry: A non-randomized, nested registry cohort of subjects who will receive the ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral Aortic Valve System XL (ACURATE Prime XL Nested Registry). Participating centers will be a subset of United States centers that have enrolled subjects in ACURATE IDE. Data from subjects in this nested registry will be summarized separately from the randomized and roll-in cohorts.
  • ACURATE Extended Durability Study: An additional 1:1 randomized study (ACURATE versus a commercially available balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3™ Transcatheter Heart Valve or future iteration [SAPIEN 3; Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA] or a commercially available self-expanding CoreValve® Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System, CoreValve® Evolut™ R Recapturable TAVR System, EVOLUT™ PRO System, or future iteration [CoreValve; Medtronic, Inc., Dublin, Ireland]) including only subjects considered to be at low surgical risk. Subjects will receive ACURATE neo2 (S, M, or L valve sizes) or ACURATE Prime XL. Data from subjects in the Extended Durability Study will be summarized separately from other cohorts.
  • ACURATE Continued Access Study (CAS): An additional cohort of subjects receiving ACURATE neo2 (S, M, and L valve sizes) or ACURATE Prime XL. Data from subjects in the ACURATE CAS will be summarized separately from other cohorts and will be used to further assess performance and safety.

All subjects implanted will be followed at baseline, peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and then annually for up to 10 years post-procedure. Enrolled subjects who do not have a study device implanted will be assessed through 1-year post-procedure for safety/adverse events.

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 2820 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: ACURATE IDE: Transcatheter Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of ACURATE in Subjects InDicatEd for TAVR
Actual Study Start Date : June 10, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date : May 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : November 2034

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: ACURATE Valve - Main Randomized

Patients assigned to this group will be implanted with ACURATE neo2™ transfemoral TAVR System.

*A subset of subjects will also be enrolled in the 4D CT Imaging Substudy.

 Device: ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR System
ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).
Experimental: ACURATE Valve - Single-arm Roll-in
Patients assigned to this group will be implanted with ACURATE neo2™ transfemoral TAVR System.
 Device: ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR System
ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).
Active Comparator: Commercial Valve - Main Randomized

Medtronic CoreValve TAVR System OR, Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR System

Patients assigned to this group will be implanted with commercially available balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3™ Transcatheter Heart Valve or future iteration (SAPIEN 3; Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA) or a commercially available self-expanding CoreValve® Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System, CoreValve® Evolut™ R Recapturable TAVR System, EVOLUT™ PRO System, or future iteration (CoreValve; Medtronic, Inc., Dublin, Ireland) TAVR device.

*A minimum of 200 subjects will also be enrolled in the 4D CT Imaging Substudy.

 Device: Medtronic CoreValve TAVR System
Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) System (or any future Corevalve iterations): The support frame is manufactured from nitinol, which has multilevel, self-expanding properties and is radiopaque. The bioprosthesis is manufactured by suturing valve leaflets and a skirt from porcine pericardium into a tri-leaflet configuration (manufactured by Medtronic CoreValve LLC, Santa Ana, USA).

Device: Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR System
Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR system (or any future SAPIEN iterations): balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis, support frame made of cobalt-chromium, three leaflets constructed of processed bovine pericardial tissue and an outer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) sealing cuff to mitigate paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Irvine, California, USA)
Experimental: ACURATE Valve - Single-arm Prime XL

Patients assigned to this group will be implanted with ACURATE Prime™ transfemoral TAVR System XL.

*50 subjects will be enrolled in the Prime™ XL Nested Registry

 Device: ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR System XL
ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).
Experimental: ACURATE Valve - Extended Durability Randomized
Patients assigned to this group will be implanted with ACURATE neo2™ transfemoral TAVR System (S, M, L) or ACURATE Prime™ transfemoral TAVR System XL. Only low risk patients are enrolled in this group.
 Device: ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR System
ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).

Device: ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR System XL
ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).
Active Comparator: Commercial Valve - Extended Durability Randomized

Medtronic CoreValve TAVR System OR, Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR System

Patients assigned to this group will be implanted with commercially available balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3™ Transcatheter Heart Valve or future iteration (SAPIEN 3; Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA) or a commercially available self-expanding CoreValve® Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System, CoreValve® Evolut™ R Recapturable TAVR System, EVOLUT™ PRO System, or future iteration (CoreValve; Medtronic, Inc., Dublin, Ireland) TAVR device. Only low risk patients are enrolled in this group.

 Device: Medtronic CoreValve TAVR System
Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) System (or any future Corevalve iterations): The support frame is manufactured from nitinol, which has multilevel, self-expanding properties and is radiopaque. The bioprosthesis is manufactured by suturing valve leaflets and a skirt from porcine pericardium into a tri-leaflet configuration (manufactured by Medtronic CoreValve LLC, Santa Ana, USA).

Device: Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR System
Edwards SAPIEN 3 TAVR system (or any future SAPIEN iterations): balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis, support frame made of cobalt-chromium, three leaflets constructed of processed bovine pericardial tissue and an outer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) sealing cuff to mitigate paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Irvine, California, USA)
Experimental: ACURATE Valve - Continued Access Study
Patients assigned to this group will be implanted with ACURATE neo2™ transfemoral TAVR System (S, M, L) or ACURATE Prime™ transfemoral TAVR System XL.
 Device: ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR System
ACURATE neo2™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).

Device: ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR System XL
ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral TAVR system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Composite rate of all-cause mortality, all stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year in the Main Randomized Cohort. [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 1 year ]
    Primary Effectiveness Endpoint; A Clinical Events Committee (CEC), independent group of physician experts was used to evaluate all reported cases of death and stroke to determine whether they met the specific protocol definition of the event. It is the CEC adjudicated result that is used in the endpoint analysis.


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Mortality: all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  2. Stroke: disabling and non-disabling [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  3. Myocardial infarction (MI): periprocedural (≤72 hours post index procedure) and spontaneous (>72 hours post index procedure) [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  4. Bleeding: life-threatening (or disabling) and major [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  5. Major vascular complications [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  6. Number of participants with a repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy) [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  7. Number of Participants with hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV) [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  8. Number of participants with new permanent pacemaker implantation resulting from new or worsened conduction disturbances [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  9. Number of participants with new onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  10. Number of participants with Acute kidney injury (AKI; ≤7 days post index procedure): based on the AKIN System Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy) or Stage 2 [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 7 days post index procedure. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  11. Number of participants with Coronary obstruction: periprocedural [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed through 72 hours post index procedure ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  12. Number of participants with Ventricular septal perforation [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed through 72 hours post index procedure ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  13. Number of participants with Mitral apparatus damage: periprocedural [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed through 72 hours post index procedure ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  14. Number of participants with Cardiac tamponade: periprocedural [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed through 72 hours post index procedure ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  15. Number of participants with Valve migration [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  16. Number of participants with Valve embolization [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  17. Number of participants with Ectopic valve deployment [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  18. Number of participants with Transcatheter aortic valve (TAV)-in-TAV deployment [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  19. Number of participants with Prosthetic aortic valve thrombosis [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  20. Number of participants with Prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 years. ]
    Safety endpoint adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

  21. Number of participants with Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the study valve, and successful retrieval of the delivery system (site reported assessment) [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 day (peri- and post-procedure) ]
    Device Performance endpoint, as measured by site reported data

  22. Grade of aortic valve regurgitation: paravalvular, central and combined (echocardiographic assessment) [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 day (peri- and post-procedure) ]
    Device Performance endpoint, as assessed by Echocardiographic Core Laboratory

  23. Number of participants with Device Success [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 day (post-procedure) ]
    Absence of procedural mortality, correct positioning of a single transcatheter valve in the proper anatomical location, and intended performance of the study device (indexed effective orifice area [iEOA] >0.85 cm2/m2 for BMI <30 kg/cm2 and iEOA >0.70 cm2/m2 for BMI ≥30 kg/cm2 plus either a mean aortic valve gradient <20 mm Hg or a peak velocity < 3m/sec, and no moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation)

  24. Prosthetic aortic valve performance; Effective Orifice Area (EOA [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 10 years. ]
    Effective Orifice Area (EOA), as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory

  25. Prosthetic aortic valve performance; Mean Aortic Gradient [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 10 years. ]
    Mean aortic gradient as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory

  26. Prosthetic aortic valve performance; Peak Aortic Gradient [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 10 years. ]
    Peak Aortic Gradient as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory

  27. Prosthetic aortic valve performance; Peak Aortic Velocity [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 10 years. ]
    Peak Aortic Velocity as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory

  28. Prosthetic aortic valve performance; Grade of Aortic Regurgitation [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 10 years. ]
    Grade of Aortic Regurgitation as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory

  29. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Status classification [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 10 years. ]
    Evaluated by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification

  30. Neurological status; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Assessment [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed at discharge and 1 year. ]
    - National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at discharge and 1 year

  31. Neurological status; Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Assessment [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. ]
    - Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and all follow-up visits through 5 years

  32. Neurological status; Neurological physical exam assessment [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the trial, through 10 years. ]
    - Neurological physical exam in all subjects where stroke is suspected

  33. Health Status; Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Quality of Life questionnaire Assessment [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 1 and 5 years. ]
    Evaluated by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Quality of Life questionnaire

  34. Health Status; SF-12 Quality of Life questionnaire Assessment [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 1 and 5 years. ]
    Evaluated by SF-12 Quality of Life questionnaire


Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IC1. Subject has documented severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis defined as follows: aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.0 cm2 (or AVA index ≤0.6 cm2/m2) AND a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mmHg, OR maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/s, OR Doppler velocity index ≤0.25 as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics.

Note: In cases of low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%), dobutamine can be used to assess the grade of aortic stenosis (maximum dobutamine dose of 20 mcg/kg/min recommended); the subject may be enrolled if echocardiographic criteria are met with this augmentation.

  • IC2. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of ≥20.5 mm and ≤29 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]) and, for the Main Randomized Cohort and the Extended Durability Study, is deemed treatable with an available size of both test and control device.
  • IC3. For subjects with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis per IC1 definition above, functional status is NYHA Functional Class ≥ II.
  • IC4. Heart team (which must include an experienced cardiac interventionalist and an experienced cardiac surgeon) agrees that the subject is indicated for TAVR, is likely to benefit from valve replacement, and TAVR is appropriate.
  • IC5. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.
  • IC6. Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.
  • IC7. Subject is expected to be able to take the protocol-required adjunctive pharmacologic therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • EC1. Subject has a unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
  • EC2. Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin elevation).
  • EC3. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack clinically confirmed by a neurologist or neuroimaging within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment.
  • EC4. Subject is on renal replacement therapy or has eGFR <20.
  • EC5. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.
  • EC6. Subject has severe (4+) aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation.
  • EC7. Subject has moderate or severe mitral stenosis (mitral valve area ≤1.5 cm2 and diastolic pressure half-time ≥150 ms, Stage C or D76).
  • EC8. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  • EC9. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
  • EC10. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention.
  • EC11. Subject has platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3.
  • EC12. Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions.
  • EC13. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to the protocol required medications (aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin), or to the individual components of the test or control valve (nickel, titanium, stainless steel, platinum, iridium or polyethylene terephthalate [PET]).
  • EC14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment.
  • EC15. Subject has hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • EC16. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty, pacemaker implantation, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, which are allowed).
  • EC17. Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization.
  • EC18. Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction <20%.
  • EC19. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices.
  • EC20. Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the study device (test or control) delivery systems as defined in the device (test or control) Directions For Use.

  • EC21. Subject has either of the following:

    • Severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely; marked tortuosity; significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta; severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta; or thick, protruding, ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch), OR
    • Severe/eccentric calcification of the aortic annulus that would prevent safe implantation of the TAVR prosthesis.
  • EC22. Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.) that may interfere with the subject's participation in this study.
  • EC23. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint or subject intends to participate in another investigational device clinical trial within 12 months after index procedure.
  • EC24. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation.
  • EC25. Subject has severe incapacitating dementia.

Additional exclusion criteria apply to subjects considered for enrollment in the CT Imaging Substudy as listed below.

  • AEC1. Subject has eGFR <30 mL/min (chronic kidney disease stage IV or stage V)
  • AEC2. Subject has atrial fibrillation that cannot be rate controlled to ventricular response rate < 60 bpm.
  • AEC3. Subject is expected to undergo chronic anticoagulation therapy after the index procedure.

Note: Subjects treated with short-term anticoagulation post procedure can be included in the CT Imaging Substudy; in these subjects the 30-day imaging will be performed 30 days after discontinuation of anticoagulation.

Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03735667


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Lisa Currier 508-683-4927 Lisa.Currier@bsci.com

Locations
Show Show 80 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Boston Scientific Corporation
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Raj R. Makkar, MD Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute
Principal Investigator: Michael J. Reardon, MD Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Boston Scientific Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03735667    
Other Study ID Numbers: S2408
First Posted: November 8, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: June 7, 2023
Last Verified: June 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Plan Description: The data and study protocol for this clinical trial may be made available to other researchers in accordance with the Boston Scientific Data Sharing Policy (http://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/data-sharing-requests.html)

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA: Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Aortic Valve Disease
Heart Valve Diseases
 Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Ventricular Outflow Obstruction