Management of Lower Punctal Stenosis.
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03731143 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 6, 2018
Last Update Posted : November 6, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Epiphora | Procedure: insertion of self retaining bicanalicular stent | Not Applicable |
This is a prospective non-randomized study which was conducted upon 24 patients with total lower punctual occlusion attending at Menoufia University hospitals in the period from January 2014 to January 2018. Ethics approval from the institutional review board was obtained, and a written informed consent was taken from every patient according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
All patients of the study were complaining of epiphora and had a thorough ophthalmological examination including dye disappearance test, and slit-lamp examination. The dye disappearance test was performed with a drop of 2% fluorescein sodium and assessment after 5 minutes of the remaining dye in the tear meniscus was done and results were graded.
Surgical procedure
All operations were done under general anesthesia and were performed by two authors (SSM, KES). The authors performed lacrimal probing and syringing test through the normal punctum to exclude concomitant occluded common canaliculus or nasolacrimal duct. The pigtail probe was passed through the canalicular system from the normal punctum to the occluded aspect. When the tip of the pigtail probe was positioned near the occluded punctal area, the surgeon pushed the area to be tented with the pigtail probe. After they advanced the pigtail probe back and forth several times until they could locate the correct position of the occluded punctum, the authors incised the tented area with a scalpel No. 11 to make a new punctal opening.
To ensure punctal and canalicular patency, syringing was repeated through the perforated punctum. To prevent re-occlusion of punctal opening, a self retaining bicanalicular tube (FCI®; Paris, France) was inserted through the normal and perforated puncti.
The silicone tube was left in place for 6 months before it was removed. Patients were then followed up for 1 year after the surgery (6 months after removal of the tube). During the follow-up period, the authors investigated the improvement of subjective epiphora symptoms based on Munk score, fluorescein disappearance test, maintenance of newly formed punctal opening, and incidence of complications.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 24 participants |
| Allocation: | N/A |
| Intervention Model: | Single Group Assignment |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Simple Surgical Approach for the Management of Acquired Severe Lower Punctual Stenosis |
| Actual Study Start Date : | January 12, 2014 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | January 12, 2018 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | January 12, 2018 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: study arm
surgical opening the lower punctum using the pig tail probe and a scalpel followed by insertion of self retaining bicanalicular stent (FCI®; Paris, France).
|
Procedure: insertion of self retaining bicanalicular stent
The pigtail probe was passed through the canalicular system from the normal punctum to the occluded aspect. When the tip of the pigtail probe was positioned near the occluded punctal area, the surgeon pushed the area to be tented with the pigtail probe. After they advanced the pigtail probe back and forth several times until they could locate the correct position of the occluded punctum, the authors incised the tented area with a scalpel No. 11 to make a new punctal opening. To ensure punctal and canalicular patency, syringing was repeated through the perforated punctum. To prevent re-occlusion of punctal opening, a self retaining bicanalicular tube (FCI®; Paris, France) was inserted through the normal and perforated puncti |
- Degree of improvement of epiphora by Munk score [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
Measurement of improvement of epiphora by use of Munk score as follow Grade Clinical finding 0 No Epiphora.
- Occasional epiphora requiring drying or dabbing less than twice a day.
- Epiphora requiring dabbing two to four times per day.
- Epiphora requiring dabbing five to ten times per day.
- Epiphora requiring dabbing more than ten times daily or constant tearing.
- Degree of improvement of lacrimal drainage by Dye disappearance test [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
measurement of improvement by using the dye disappearance test. It was performed by putting a drop of 2% fluorescein sodium in the conjunctival sac followed by assessment after 5 minutes of the remaining dye in the tear meniscus. Results were graded according to the following scale
Grade Dye disappearance time, min
- <3
- 3-5
- >5
- Slit lamp assesment of the state of the lower punctum [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
Slit lamp examination of the lower punctum and its grading according to Kashkouli scale as follows:
Grade Clinical Findings 0 No punctum (agenesis)
- Papilla is covered with a membrane (difficult to recognize)
- Less than normal size, but recognizable
- Normal
- Small slit (<2 mm)
- Large slit (≤2 mm
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 17 Years to 67 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- severe lowee punctual stenosis
- patent upper punctum and canaliculus as well as patent nasolacrimal duct
- normal lower eyelid margin position -
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with punctal stenosis with grades more than 0 according to Kashkouli scale
- patients with previous eyelid surgery
- a lump overlying or involving the punctum or other part of the tear drainage system.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03731143
| Principal Investigator: | Sameh S Mandour, MD | Menoufia Fculty of Medicine |
| Responsible Party: | Sameh S. Mandour, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology., Menoufia University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03731143 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
446H/2013 |
| First Posted: | November 6, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | November 6, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | November 2018 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
pigtail punctal stenosis bicanalicular |
|
Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases Constriction, Pathologic Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Eye Diseases |

