Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Perceptions of the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) in Surgical Training in the UK and Ireland

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03718481
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 24, 2018
Last Update Posted : October 29, 2018
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
The Association of Surgeons in Training
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Deirdre Nally, University College Hospital Galway

Brief Summary:
A Prospective Cross Sectional Questionnaire Study was conducted to evaluate surgical trainees' experiences of the ARCP process in order to identify areas for improvement.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Education, Medical Other: ARCP Process

Detailed Description:

Background: Surgical trainees in the UK and Ireland undergo rigorous formative and summative assessments throughout each placement and appraisal at an Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP). The ARCP evaluates performance during each training year and determines progression to the next year of training. It is critical that the ARCP is a robust and fair process. The Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) sought to evaluate surgical trainees' experiences of the ARCP process in order to identify areas for improvement.

Methods: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study was conducted An electronic survey was developed and distributed electronically to the trainee membership of ASiT in the UK and Republic of Ireland. A 57 point survey examined the specifics of one ARCP cycle as well as attitudes to the process in general. Quantitative analysis was performed, along with thematic analysis on the free-text comments.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 600 participants
Observational Model: Other
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Perceptions of the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) in Surgical Training in the UK and Ireland: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.
Actual Study Start Date : October 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 31, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : March 31, 2018

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Surgical Trainees
Trainee membership of the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) in the UK and the Republic of Ireland
Other: ARCP Process
One Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) cycle. In the U.K., doctors, across all specialities, undergo an Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) to evaluate performance during each training year and determine progression to the next year of training. Similar processes exist in the Republic of Ireland. The process and requirements for ARCP in the UK are specified in the Gold Guide, the Reference Guide for Postgraduate Specialty Training [1]. It defines ARCP as a formal process that uses evidence collected by trainees to review and record performance, demonstrate competencies achieved and inform decisions regarding progression in training




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Experiences of Annual Review of Competence and Progression [ Time Frame: Oct 2017-March 2018 ]
    Experience of preparation, processes and standards. These will be measured on an anonymous, online survey (Survey monkey) and participants will be asked to rate their experiences of the ARCP using a likert scale. Specific experiences will include preparation for Annual Review of Competence and Progression-timing of decision making and value of the process as an educational tool and contribution of traineers, supervisors and the ARCP panel. Examples of questions are Did you feel your progression was fairly assessed? Possible answers include very fair, fair, neutral, not fair, very unfair


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Face to Face [ Time Frame: Oct 2017- March 2018 ]
    Trainees attitudes to a face to face Annual Review of Competence and Progression This will be measured on a likert scale similar to that outlined above (Strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree). There will be space for free text comments on the survey and a thematic analysis will be performed according to the steps of Braun and Clarke on the comments



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
Surgical Trainees in the UK and Ireland who are members of ASiT
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be a trainee member of ASiT
  • All grades, Deaneries, including less than full-time/academic trainees are eligible for inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

• Student members are excluded


Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03718481


Locations
Layout table for location information
United Kingdom
Association of Surgeons in Training
London, United Kingdom
Sponsors and Collaborators
University College Hospital Galway
The Association of Surgeons in Training
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Deirdre Nally, MCH The Association of Surgeons in Training
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Deirdre Nally, Research Fellow RCSI, ASiT representative for Republic of Ireland, University College Hospital Galway
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03718481    
Other Study ID Numbers: ASiT ARCP
First Posted: October 24, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: October 29, 2018
Last Verified: October 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Deirdre Nally, University College Hospital Galway:
ARCP
Surgical Training
Assessment
Qualitative
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Disease Progression
Disease Attributes
Pathologic Processes