Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Evaluating Feasibility and Effectiveness of Computerized Mathematic Training

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03706144
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 15, 2018
Last Update Posted : March 24, 2020
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Julia Jaekel, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Brief Summary:
This is a randomized controlled trial that is carried out in collaboration with Knox County Schools, using an adaptive, open-access, online math training programs as intervention and student growth in math attainment as the primary outcome over one school year.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Math Teachers (Grades 2-8) Math Students (Grades 2-8) Other: Prodigy Math Training Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Computational fluency and understanding of mathematical concepts are essential for students' math achievement. Attainment of math learning goals in childhood uniquely predicts life-course success and wellbeing.Thus, investing in childhood math proficiency is critically important to prepare students for solving problems and succeeding in life. In schools, math teachers are faced with increasingly complex demands but instruction time is limited. Students who are struggling may need extensive individualized practice to succeed. To that end, novel computerized training methods are used in today's schools to help students obtain crucial abilities. According to the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), most schools have adopted digital tools in the classroom, and they are increasingly interested in providing students access to new educational resources. Such specialized programs may have the potential to enhance children's academic growth trajectories, but they are not sufficiently evaluated. Moreover, teachers may not be prepared to select and use adequate digital tools.

There are numerous online learning programs that elicit different levels of motivation in students while adhering to Common Core State Standards. Some of them are expensive for schools whereas others are free, which makes them especially attractive for socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. One of the newer, but highly used programs is Prodigy, an adaptive open-access online math training game that continuously adapts to students' progress. Prodigy is different than most other programs because of its play-based, virtual reality environment that students explore with an avatar while solving math questions. As a result, students may be highly motivated and elect to spend more time on Prodigy than on other learning programs. Prodigy is currently being used by around 26 million students and teachers in the United States and Canada (https://www.prodigygame.com/), 150 school districts in the US have implemented Prodigy as part of their math curriculum, and many districts are expected to change from other programs to Prodigy, but the program has not been evaluated so far.

The investigators' aim is to evaluate the use and effectiveness of the adaptive Prodigy math training program via a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the Knox County Schools (KCS) district.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 69 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:

This is a randomized trial with two arms. Teachers (and their respective classes of students) have been randomized into one of two groups:

  1. Participating in the adaptive, online Prodigy Math Training
  2. treatment as usual (TAU) - classic math instruction in school
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:

The primary outcomes are standardized, computerized assessments.

Please note that the primary outcome is on the individual student level, while the randomization and participant number below is per teacher.

Each teacher participates with 1-4 classes of on average 25 students

Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Official Title: Evaluating Feasibility and Effectiveness of Computerized Mathematic Training - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date : May 1, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date : April 30, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date : May 30, 2019

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Prodigy Intervention Group
Teachers will use the Prodigy Math Training with their students in school for at least 20 minutes per day, 3 days per week, from August to December 2018.
Other: Prodigy Math Training
https://www.prodigygame.com/

No Intervention: Control Group
Instruction as usual = TAU



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in mathematic achievement [ Time Frame: 8 months ]
    Change in mathematic achievement trajectories assessed with standardized Aimsweb Concepts and Applications scales test scores at three defined time points over 8 months: baseline (pre-test) assessment is in September, post-test and follow-up assessments take place in early January and late April 2019. An increase in scores indicates better outcomes (i.e., positive change) over time.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elementary and middle school math teachers
  • Students grades 2-8

Exclusion Criteria:

n/a


Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03706144


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Tennessee
University of Tennessee Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37996-3531
Sponsors and Collaborators
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Julia Jaekel, PhD University of Tennessee Knoxville
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Julia Jaekel, Associate Professor, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03706144    
Other Study ID Numbers: UTK IRB-18-04338-XM
First Posted: October 15, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: March 24, 2020
Last Verified: March 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No