Performance, Safety and Efficacy of PICO Device.
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03698968 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : October 9, 2018
Last Update Posted : September 18, 2019
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Wound Heal | Device: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy | Not Applicable |
Although evidence exists which supports the positive effects of NPWT on take of skin grafts and flaps, there is limited evidence in relation to single-use systems such as PICO. Most previous studies have used traditional NPWT systems as part of their design. Though the technical applications of the traditional and newer single-use systems are comparable it is possible that some of the features of the latter may influence clinical outcomes. In addition to the limitations highlighted above, the cited studies have seldom assessed the ease of management and acceptability of NPWT systems. Although clinical outcomes may be considered paramount, these usability factors could also play a key role in ensuring compliance with negative pressure protocols.
Although evidence exists which supports the positive effects of NPWT on take of skin grafts and flaps, there is limited evidence in relation to single-use systems such as PICO. Most previous studies have used traditional NPWT systems as part of their design. Though the technical applications of the traditional and newer single-use systems are comparable it is possible that some of the features of the latter may influence clinical outcomes. In addition to the limitations highlighted above, the cited studies have seldom assessed the ease of management and acceptability of NPWT systems. Although clinical outcomes may be considered paramount, these usability factors could also play a key role in ensuring compliance with negative pressure protocols.
The study is being conducted to evaluate the safe and effective use of the PICO 7 system in surgically closed incision sites and wounds requiring closure by skin graft or flap as part of the PMCF plan for this product, for the purpose of continuing CE (Conformité Européene) Mark approval in accordance with MEDDEV 2.12-2.
The PICO system has recently been updated with minor modifications that make the system silent during wear. S & N also wish to collect PMCF data in the indications of knee and abdominal incisions in order to make retrospective comparisons with data previously collected for these indications.
The aim of this study is therefore to assess whether the PICO 7 system is a safe and effective therapy for surgically closed incisions, skin grafts and flaps. Effectiveness will be defined by the ability of the system to deliver negative pressure and handle exudate and by percentage of successful skin graft or flap survival at Day 14.
A summary of known and potential risks and benefits to humans of each test article can be found in the Instructions for Use of PICO 7.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 50 participants |
| Allocation: | N/A |
| Intervention Model: | Single Group Assignment |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Masking Description: | Open |
| Primary Purpose: | Prevention |
| Official Title: | A Prospective Follow up Study to Assess Performance, Safety and Efficacy of the PICO 7 NPWT System for Surgically Closed Incision Sites and Skin Grafts. |
| Actual Study Start Date : | November 6, 2018 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | June 18, 2019 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | June 18, 2019 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Single prospective intervention |
Device: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Single use disposable negative pressure system. The system is capable of delivering up to 80 mm Hg negative pressure to a wound or surgical incision site and managing low to moderate levels of exudate or fluid generated by the wound or incision. The therapy may be administered for up to 1 week. |
- Functional clinical performance of the PICO 7 NPWT system through delivery of negative pressure [ Time Frame: 7 Days ]Negative pressure maintenance at nominal 80 mmHg as assessed as the average of the negative pressure values recorded by the device microchip
- Functional clinical performance of the PICO 7 NPWT system through wound exudate management [ Time Frame: 7 Days ]Number of NPWT systems with no occurrence of exudate leaks as assessed through a combination of leakage alert data from device microchip and/or clinical data on any leakage observed during the dressing wearing period resulting or not, in an unplanned dressing change
- Composite Clinical Success [ Time Frame: 7 Days ]
Composite Clinical Success (CCS) defined as a binary variable (1/0) (1 if both of the following are true and 0 if at least one of the two is false):
A. Nominal pressure is in the interval 80mmHg ± 7mmHg
B. No leakage
- Number of participants with incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) - Superficial, deep. [CDC criteria] [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]For incidence of SSI and incidence of SSC binary variables indicating presence of/absence of will be defined and the frequencies together with percentages reported/identified outcomes will be reported. Logistic models will be fitted and associated factors adjusted for if there is adequate data
- Number of participants with incidence of Surgical Site Complications (SSC) - dehiscence (superficial/deep etc.), seroma, necrosis, hematoma, suture abscess [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]For incidence of SSI and incidence of SSC binary variables indicating presence of/absence of will be defined and the frequencies together with percentages reported/identified outcomes will be reported. Logistic models will be fitted and associated factors adjusted for if there is adequate data
- Percentage of successful skin graft take or flap survival at Days 7, 14 and 30 [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]Assessed by clinician visual assessment
- Visual inspection of peri-wound skin condition [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]Visual inspection assessment (e.g., healthy, fragile, inflamed, erythema, bruising, eczematous, dry/flaky, macerated) at 7, 14 and 30 days
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - pain [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]Level of subject pain during wear of the PICO 7 system, at dressing removal and at application assessed by VAS scale (pain intensity as none, mild, moderate, or severe) following 7 day therapy
- Dressing wear time in days [ Time Frame: 30 Days ]Assessed through a combination of data from device microchip and CRF recorded data of any unplanned dressing change
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject must provide written informed consent
- Subjects eighteen (18) years of age or older.
- Willing and able to make all required study visits.
- Able to follow instructions.
- Subject is suitable to participate in the study in the opinion of the Investigator
- Subject has a suitable, closed abdominal or knee surgery incision skin flap or skin graft (STSG, meshed or non-meshed) (if there is more than one incision then the clinician should choose the one which in their opinion is most suited to PICO therapy), that fits under the absorbent dressing area of the appropriate PICO 7 dressing supplied.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications (per the PICO 7 IFU) or hypersensitivity to the use of the investigational product or their components (e.g. silicone adhesives and polyurethane films [direct contact with incision], acrylic adhesives [direct contact with skin], polyethylene fabrics and super-absorbent powders [polyacrylates]) within the dressing).
- Subjects with extremely fragile skin who require the use of SECURA non-sting barrier skin wipes and have hypersensitivity to the ingredients in the wipes
- Participation in the treatment period of another clinical trial within thirty (30) days of operative visit or during the study.
- Subjects with skin features (e.g. tattoos, skin colour, pre-existing scarring) which in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the study assessments.
- Patients undergoing a procedure as part of palliative care (to be confirmed during surgery).
- Subjects with incisions or skin grafts that are actively bleeding unless haemostasis has been achieved (to be confirmed during surgery).
- Subjects with infected skin grafts or incisions at the time of surgery (except for those with perforated bowel or peritonitis).
- Subjects who have participated previously in this clinical trial
- Subjects with a history of poor compliance with medical treatment.
- Subjects with skin grafts to correct pressure ulcers where compression therapy is needed for healing (based on clinicians expertise).
- Subjects with a medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude safe subject participation in the study.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03698968
| Switzerland | |
| Ospedale Regionale di Lugano; Sede Ospedale Italiano | |
| Lugano, Switzerland | |
| United Kingdom | |
| Mid Essex Hospital Services | |
| Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom, CM1 7ET | |
| The Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation | |
| Oswestry, Shropshire, United Kingdom, SY10 7AG | |
| University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust | |
| Birmingham, United Kingdom | |
| Queen Victoria Hospital | |
| East Grinstead, United Kingdom, RH19 3DZ | |
| Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | |
| Manchester, United Kingdom | |
| Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital | |
| Margate, United Kingdom | |
| North Tyneside General Hospital | |
| North Shields, United Kingdom | |
| Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital | |
| Norwich, United Kingdom, NR47UY | |
| Peterborough City Hospital, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust | |
| Peterborough, United Kingdom | |
| Mid-Yorkshire NHS Trust | |
| Wakefield, United Kingdom | |
| Study Director: | Rachael Winter | T.J. Smith & Nephew, LTD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Sudheer Karlakki | Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital |
| Responsible Party: | Smith & Nephew, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03698968 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
CT1703PC7 |
| First Posted: | October 9, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | September 18, 2019 |
| Last Verified: | September 2019 |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
surgical complication NPWT negative pressure knee arthroplasty |
abdominal incision skin graft infection dehisced |

