Comparison of Peri-implant Tissues Using Socket Shield Technique Versus Xenograft
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03684356 |
|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified February 2020 by Mohamed Atef Abd El Moneium, Cairo University.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : September 25, 2018
Last Update Posted : February 18, 2020
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Socket Shield | Procedure: socket shield technique Procedure: xenograft | Phase 3 |
to compare the efficacy of the socket shield technique in counteracting the dimensional changes of the soft and hard peri-implant tissues to filliing the buccal gap with xenograft.
- Population (P): Patients with single non-restorable tooth in the esthetic zone.
- Intervention (I): Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique.
- Comparator (C): Immediate implant placement and filling the buccal gap with xenograft.
- Primary Outcome (O): Pink Esthetic Score (PES) (Fürhauser et al., 2005).
- Time frame: 9 months (Chu et al., 2015).
- Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 22 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison of the Dimensional Changes of Hard and Soft Peri-implant Tissues Around Single Immediate Post-Extraction Implants in the Esthetic Zone With Socket Shield Technique Versus Using Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
| Actual Study Start Date : | February 22, 2019 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | December 2020 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 2020 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: experimental
immediate implant with socket shield technique
|
Procedure: socket shield technique
immediate implant placement with buccal part of the root is retained |
|
Active Comparator: control
immediate implant placement with filling the buccal gap with xenograft
|
Procedure: xenograft
immediate implant placement with filling the buccal gap with xenograft |
- pink esthetic score [ Time Frame: 9 months ]Pink esthetic score evaluates the soft tissue esthetics around implant supported crowns. Using a 0-1-2 scoring system, 0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest value. The maximum achievable PES is 14. 7 variables are measured: mesial and distal papillae being 0 if absent, 1 if incomplete and 2 if complete. Alveolar process, soft tissue level, contour, texture and color being 0 if major discrepancy, 1 if minor discrepancy and 2 if matches the contralateral
- Recession of the buccal peri-implant mucosa [ Time Frame: 9 months ]measured at the apical zenith of the mucosal margin on the implants after digital superimposition of the optically scanned models as the vertical distance change between the former and the new position of soft tissue margins.
- Corono-apical peri-implant bone dimensional changes [ Time Frame: 6 months ]measured at the middle of the buccal implant surface after the superimposition of Cone Beam C.T scans as the difference between the former and new vertical distance from the implant platform to the buccal alveolar crest
- Bucco-lingual peri-implant bone dimensional changes [ Time Frame: 6 months ]measured at middle of the buccal implant surface 1mm below the alveolar crest after the superimposition of the Cone Beam C.T scans as the difference between the former and new horizontal distance between the buccal and the palatal plate of bone
- Patient satisfaction: VAS [ Time Frame: 9 months ]Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using a questionnaire which is based on a visual analog scale (VAS). A horizontal VAS bar, 100 mm long, with the right anchor labeled "much less than natural teeth" which is marked by zero and the left anchor labeled "much more" which is marked by 10 will be used. Five questions will be formulated to record the patients' satisfaction in terms of functionality and from an esthetic point of view. Participants will look in a mirror and also be viewed a photograph before recording their answers on the horizontal calibrated line.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient's age was 18 years or older.
- Non-restorable tooth in the upper inter-bicuspid area.
- Adequate bone volume for the placement of immediate implant.
- Following tooth extraction, there was an intact socket bony wall (type I extraction socket).
- Primary stability of the implant was achieved at the time of the implant placement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who reported tobacco use in the past 5 years.
- Patients who had severe periodontal destruction at the site of implant placement.
- The presence of any signs of acute infection in the surgical site or the adjacent two natural teeth.
- Patients who had history of any systemic disease that precludes the placement of implants.
- Any disease that might affect bone metabolism as osteoporosis.
- Patients taking medications that might affect bone turn over as bisphosphonates.
- Physically or mentally handicapped patients.
- Pregnant females.
- Teeth with vertical root fractures on the buccal aspect
- Teeth with any other pathologies affecting the buccal part of the root, for example, external or internal resorptions.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03684356
| Contact: Mohamed A Abd El Moneium, Ass.lecturer | 01224302609 ext 002 | matef1989@gmail.com | |
| Contact: Ahmed H El Barbary, A. professor | 01223153678 ext 002 | ahmedelbarbary102@hotmail.com |
| Egypt | |
| Cairo University | Recruiting |
| Cairo, Egypt, 141 | |
| Study Chair: | Amr F Zahran, Professor | Professor in Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology |
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Mohamed Atef Abd El Moneium, assistant lecturer, Cairo University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03684356 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
CairoU12 |
| First Posted: | September 25, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | February 18, 2020 |
| Last Verified: | February 2020 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |

