Comparison Of Isometric And Isokinetic Strength Training Effects On Physical Performance In Athletes With Knee Pain
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03641781 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : August 22, 2018
Last Update Posted : August 22, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Injuries | Other: isometric strength training and isokinetic strength training | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 50 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | Athletes were randomly assigned into two groups: Isometric (ISOM) and Isokinetic (ISOK). A coin was flipped at start of data collection for the first patient to be assigned odd number and included in isometric group. Later on odd and even numbered patients were included in specific group. Additionally, data was collected from healthy athletes doing their training at Pakistan Sports Board, called healthy control group. Due to ethical constraints knee pain athletes were not included as control subjects |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison Of Isometric And Isokinetic Strength Training Effects On Physical Performance In Athletes With Knee Pain |
| Actual Study Start Date : | January 2016 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | September 2016 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | November 2016 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Isometric strength training group
Knee pain athletes were assessed by The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee evaluation form and were assigned into ISOM group. ISOM group participants were involved in isometric strengthTraining at angle of 30°,45°,60° of knee flexion for 5 maximum contraction for both hamstring and quadriceps. 10 sessions were given on alternate day basis by using Biodex Isokinetic system.
|
Other: isometric strength training and isokinetic strength training
Isokinetic strength program included strength training at 5 different velocities from slow to fast. Participants were trained on speed of 30°/sec, 90°/sec, 150°/sec, 210°/sec and 270°/sec. Flexion and extension movements were completed with 5 repetitions at each speed. Participants of isometric strength training group performed isometric contractions at 30°, 45° and 60° of knee flexion with five repetitions at each angle for both hamstring and quadriceps. |
|
Active Comparator: Isokinetic strength training group
Knee pain athletes were assessed by The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 Subjective Knee evaluation form and were assigned into ISOK group isokinetic training group randomly. ISOk group participants were involved in Training at speed of 30 deg/sec, 90deg/sec, 150/deg/sec 210deg/sec, 270deg/sec 5 repetition for both hamstring and quadriceps. 10 sessions were given on alternate day basis by using Biodex Isokinetic system.
|
Other: isometric strength training and isokinetic strength training
Isokinetic strength program included strength training at 5 different velocities from slow to fast. Participants were trained on speed of 30°/sec, 90°/sec, 150°/sec, 210°/sec and 270°/sec. Flexion and extension movements were completed with 5 repetitions at each speed. Participants of isometric strength training group performed isometric contractions at 30°, 45° and 60° of knee flexion with five repetitions at each angle for both hamstring and quadriceps. |
|
No Intervention: Healthy control group
Data for outcome parameters including Peak torque average peak torque average power agonist antagonist ratio by using biodex isokinetic system for both by isometric contraction method and isokinetic method. For performance test were recorded for healthy control of same age group to compare the training effect with healthy control values.
|
- change in Agility Run Test time [ Time Frame: change from baseline through completion an average of 3 weeks ]The agility run test was conducted by placing cones at the non-slippery surface. The time to complete the test was recorded by using stop watch. A 10 Meter distance in figure of 8 was made on ground with help of cones. Time taken to complete was recorded in seconds.
- change in Vertical Jump test height [ Time Frame: change from baseline through completion an average of 3 weeks ]Vertical jump test was conducted by using the measuring tape placed on wall. Athletes were standing along the wall and the standing height, the highest level of finger touching the wall was recorded initially. Athlete then jumped vertically and marked on the wall and performed three repetitions. The greatest difference between initial standing height and after jump height was recorded as score of vertical jump.
- change in Athletic single leg stability test [ Time Frame: change from baseline through completion an average of 3 weeks ]The athletic single leg stability test was used to assess the stability of athlete conducted by using Biodex Balance System SD (Biodex Medical Systems, Inc. NY, USA). Athletes were standing on involved leg and platform setting was at level 4. Athletes performed 3 repetitions of 20 seconds each with 10 seconds rest between the repetitions to complete the test. Overall stability index, anterior posterior index, and medial lateral index were recorded.
- change in Peak Torque value (FT-LB) [ Time Frame: change from baseline through completion an average of 3 weeks ]Highest muscular force output at any moment during a repetition. Peak torque indicates the muscle's maximum strength capability. This is also equivalent to a 1-repetition maximum (RM) isotonic strength test.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 35 Years (Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- The adult athletes between ages 18 to 35 years.
- Athletes with unilateral knee pain.
- Both male and female.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Athletes with bilateral knee pain and any deformity around knee were excluded from this study.
- Any other joint involvement of lower limb while assessment were also excluded from study.
- Athletes with recent history of surgeries for fractures or ligamentous reconstruction were excluded from this study.
- Patients who were medically unstable.
| Responsible Party: | Hafiz Muhammad Manan Haider Khan, Principal investigator, Isra University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03641781 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
IIRS-IUISB/PHD/006 |
| First Posted: | August 22, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | August 22, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | August 2018 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Yes |
| Supporting Materials: |
Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR) |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Isokinetic, Isometric, Agility Athletic Single Leg Stability, Vertical Jump Biodex, Knee Pain |
|
Knee Injuries Leg Injuries Wounds and Injuries |

