Ventilator Hyperinflation With Increase of Inspiratory Time
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03630510 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : August 15, 2018
Last Update Posted : August 15, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Lung Infection Mechanical Ventilation | Other: Ventilator hyperinflation | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 38 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Crossover Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | The VHI maneuver with inspiratory time adjustment was performed in the pressure controlled ventilation mode (PCV). The inspiratory pressure was increased gradually every 5 cmH2O until reaching a maximum pressure of 35 cmH2O, according to the tolerance of the patient determined by the absence of cough. PEEP remained unchanged throughout the study. The maneuver was performed for 5 min, followed by tracheal aspiration. To perform the control (CTRL), the patients were only positioned and aspirated, without alteration in ventilatory parameters. |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Ventilator Hyperinflation With Increase of Inspiratory Time on Respiratory Mechanics: A Randomized Crossover Trial |
| Actual Study Start Date : | March 18, 2017 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | August 12, 2017 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | March 28, 2018 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: mechanical ventilator hyperinflation
The VHI maneuver with inspiratory time adjustment was performed in the pressure controlled ventilation mode (PCV). The inspiratory pressure was increased gradually every 5 cmH2O until reaching a maximum pressure of 35 cmH2O, according to the tolerance of the patient determined by the absence of cough. PEEP remained unchanged throughout the study. After reaching a maximum pressure of 35 cmH2O (PCV + PEEP level), the inspiratory time was gradually increased until the inspiratory flow reached the baseline. Concomitantly, the respiratory rate was decreased to allow the expiratory flow also to reach the baseline, to avoid self-PEEP. The maneuver was performed for 5 min, followed by tracheal aspiration.
|
Other: Ventilator hyperinflation
The ventilator hyperinflation maneuver with inspiratory time adjustment was performed in the pressure controlled ventilation mode (PCV). The inspiratory pressure was increased gradually every 5 cmH2O until reaching a maximum pressure of 35 cmH2O, according to the tolerance of the patient determined by the absence of cough. PEEP remained unchanged throughout the study. After reaching a maximum pressure of 35 cmH2O (PCV + PEEP level), the inspiratory time was gradually increased until the inspiratory flow reached the baseline. Concomitantly, the respiratory rate was decreased to allow the expiratory flow also to reach the baseline, to avoid self-PEEP. The maneuver was performed for 5 min, followed by tracheal aspiration. |
|
No Intervention: Control
To perform the control (CTRL), the patients were only positioned and aspirated, without alteration in ventilatory parameters.
|
- Static compliance of respiratory system [ Time Frame: Baseline (before), immediately after VHI and five minutes after aspiration ]Compliance was assessed through the occlusion maneuver at the end of inspiration, considering tidal volume, plateau pressure and PEEP. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.
- Total Resistance of respiratory system [ Time Frame: Baseline (before), immediately after VHI and five minutes after aspiration ]The total resistance of the respiratory system was evaluated through the occlusion maneuver at the end of the inspiration, considering the resistive pressure, measured by the difference between the maximum plateau pressure. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.
- Airway Resistance [ Time Frame: Baseline (before), immediately after VHI and five minutes after aspiration ]The airway resistance was assessed by means of the occlusion maneuver at the end of the inspiration, considering the rapid fall of the pressure immediately after the occlusion, measured by the difference between the maximum pressure and P1. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.
- Peak expiratory flow [ Time Frame: Baseline (before), immediately after VHI and five minutes after aspiration ]The peak expiratory flow was evaluated through passive expiration, being considered the greatest value of the flow in the expiratory phase.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients under mechanical ventilation for more than 48h
- Mucus hypersecretion (defined as the need for suctioning < 2-h intervals)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe bronchospasm,
- Positive end expiratory pressure > 10cmH2O,
- PaO2-FiO2 relationship < 150,
- Mean arterial pressure < 60mmHg,
- Pleural effusion or pneumothorax undrained,
- Bronchopleural or tracheoesophageal fistula,
- Decompensated congestive heart failure.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03630510
| Brazil | |
| Luciano M Chicayban | |
| Campos Dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil, 28015150 | |
| Principal Investigator: | LUCIANO M CHICAYBAN | Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa |
| Responsible Party: | Luciano Matos Chicayban, Chefe do Laboratório de Análise de Disfunções Pneumofuncionais (LADPF), Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03630510 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
VHI + Tins |
| First Posted: | August 15, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | August 15, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | August 2018 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Physical Therapy Modalities, Respiration Artificial, Respiratory Care Units, Respiratory Mechanics, Positive-Pressure Respiration |
|
Respiratory Aspiration Respiration Disorders Respiratory Tract Diseases Pathologic Processes |

