Intraoperative Investigation of a Directional Lead and Local Field Potentials for the Optimization of Stimulation Efficacy (INVENT)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03630302 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : August 14, 2018
Results First Posted : May 28, 2021
Last Update Posted : May 28, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
The current study aims to explore the functional use of LFPs recorded intraoperatively for the optimization of a directional DBS lead programming
Aim-1: To determine whether intraoperative LFPs recorded from the segmented DBS electrode can predict the optimal stimulation parameters.
Aim-2: Compare the therapeutic window for stimulation delivered through directional and conventional leads and determine if the spatiospectral LFP patterns correlate with the presence of stimulation side effects.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Parkinson | Device: DBS |
This is a feasibility study designed to evaluate the usefulness of intraoperative LFP recordings obtained from the implanted DBS lead to predict ideal stimulation parameters. Additionally this study will compare the therapeutic window for stimulation delivered through directional and conventional leads and determine if the spatiospectral LFP patterns correlate with the presence of stimulation side effects.
Approximately 15 subjects will be enrolled in this clinical investigation. The clinical investigation will be conducted at 2 centers in the USA.
Subjects participating in this clinical investigation will monitored during DBS implant procedure and programming. The expected duration of enrollment is 8 months. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 1 year.
| Study Type : | Observational |
| Actual Enrollment : | 10 participants |
| Observational Model: | Case-Only |
| Time Perspective: | Prospective |
| Official Title: | Intraoperative Investigation of a Directional Lead and Local Field Potentials for the Optimization of Stimulation Efficacy |
| Actual Study Start Date : | July 12, 2018 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | December 31, 2019 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | January 31, 2020 |
- Device: DBS
Deep Brain Stimulation
- Number of DBS Leads With Clinical Programming at 3 Months That Were Consistent With Predictions Via LFP Features After DBS Implant Procedure [ Time Frame: LFPs were analyzed after DBS implant procedure, clinical programming were done at 3 month followup ]
From all DBS leads (2 per patient):
Local field potentials (LFPs) were measured intraoperatively during DBS implant. Features such as beta band power (10-30Hz), high-frequency oscillation power (200-400Hz, HFO), as well as the cross frequency coupling between beta band power and HFO (CFC) were extracted from the LFP recordings from all electrodes. Electrodes with the most beta band power, most HFOs, and most CFC were documented.
At 3 month post-op visit, the clinically programmed stimulation electrodes were documented, and were compared to the electrodes documented from the intraoperative LFP measures. Both matches in the exact contact and the row at which the contacts were in were documented and compared.
- Number of DBS Leads With the Highest Side Effect Threshold at 3 Months That Were Consistent With Predictions Derived From LFPs After DBS Implant Procedure [ Time Frame: LFPs were measured during DBS implant procedure, clinical programming were done at 3 month followup evaluation ]
From all DBS leads (2 per patient):
Local field potentials (LFPs) were measured intraoperatively during DBS implant. Features such as beta band power (10-30Hz), high-frequency oscillation power (200-400Hz, HFO), as well as the cross frequency coupling between beta band power and HFO (CFC) were extracted from the LFP recordings from all electrodes. Electrodes with the most beta band power, most HFOs, and most CFC were documented.
At 3 month post-op visit, the stimulation electrode that produced the largest side effect threshold (any side effect) were documented, and were compared to the electrodes with the largest beta band, HFO, and CFC power documented from the intraoperative LFP measures.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-70 years
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, and DBS consensus team review supporting the placement of STN DBS.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject is not a surgical candidate;
- In the Investigator's opinion the subject unable to tolerate multiple programming sessions within a single setting;
- Subject unable to comply with the follow-up schedule
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03630302
| United States, Texas | |
| CHI St. Luke's Health Baylor College of Medicine Med. Ctr. | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
Documents provided by Abbott Medical Devices:
| Responsible Party: | Abbott Medical Devices |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03630302 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
CRD_931 INVENT |
| First Posted: | August 14, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | May 28, 2021 |
| Last Update Posted: | May 28, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | May 2021 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | Yes |
| Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: | Yes |

