Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Spinal Hydromorphone Versus Morphine for Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesia

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03592992
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : July 19, 2018
Last Update Posted : June 3, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Lawson Health Research Institute

Brief Summary:
Morphine is usually used for pain relief after cesarean delivery. However, sometimes it is not available, the patient might be allergic to morphine or intolerant to its side effects. Hydromorphone, another drug from the same class, might be used alternatively, but we need to prove that it is not inferior to morphine.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Postoperative Pain Drug: Spinal Hydromorphone Drug: Spinal Morphine Phase 4

Detailed Description:

Spinal or intrathecal (IT) morphine is the most commonly used opioid for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Factors that contribute to its widespread use include a favorable pharmacokinetic profile with duration of action up to 24 hours, ease of administration (during spinal block for surgical anesthesia) and low cost. Most providers administer 100 to 200 mcg of IT morphine for cesarean delivery analgesia with excellent analgesic results. Nevertheless, subarachnoid use of morphine is not without adverse events. While dose-dependent respiratory depression is the most worrisome complication, other side effects such as pruritus, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention can be bothersome during early puerperium. Furthermore, shortages of preservative free morphine in the United States has led clinicians to seek a reasonable alternative.

For the last 20 years, spinal hydromorphone has been successfully used for chronic pain associated with neoplasms. Its use for post-cesarean analgesia has been successfully reported. However, data regarding its efficacy in the IT space for post-cesarean analgesia is scarce. In the past, doses of 40 to 100 mcg have been reported to provide adequate postoperative pain relief with minimal side effects. In a recent study, the Effective Dose in 90% of patients has been established for both Hydromorphone and Morphine to be 75 mcg and 150 mcg, respectively.

No prospective studies have been conducted to specifically establish non-inferiority of hydromorphone when compared to morphine for post- cesarean analgesia. In addition, while all opioids share the same side effect profile, the frequency of those events are unknown for IT hydromorphone.

The current proposal is a blinded randomized controlled trial of intrathecal hydromorphone versus morphine in term pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 126 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Institutional Research Ethics Board Approval was obtained (Western Research Ethics Board 111264). Term pregnant women presenting to the Obstetric Care Unit at Victoria Hospital for an elective cesarean delivery will be approached for recruitment. Consenting participants will be randomly assigned to receive either 75 mcg of hydromorphone or 150 mcg of morphine at the time of their spinal anesthetic. Randomization will be achieved through a simple computerized randomization technique (use of random numbers list for allocation).
Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description: Allocation concealment will be achieved through central pharmacy randomization with the use of a master randomization list of computer-generated random numbers prior to initiation of recruitment.
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Spinal Hydromorphone Versus Morphine for Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesia: A Non-Inferiority Trial
Actual Study Start Date : November 11, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 2022
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 2022

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Cesarean Section

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Spinal Hydromorphone
For the intervention group, 75 mcg of hydromorphone will be added to the spinal anesthetic mixture as a one-time injection prior to cesarean delivery.
Drug: Spinal Hydromorphone
75 mcg of hydromorphone will be prepared in a non-identifiable syringe by central hospital pharmacy. The resulting solution will then be added to the spinal anesthetic mixture(fentanyl 15 mcg and 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine 1.4-1.6 mcg at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, adjusted to height and weight)

Active Comparator: Spinal Morphine
For the control group,150 mcg of preservative-free morphine will be added to the spinal anesthetic mixture as a one-time injection prior to cesarean delivery.
Drug: Spinal Morphine
150 mcg of morphine will be prepared in a non-identifiable syringe by central hospital pharmacy.The resulting solution will be added to the spinal anesthetic mixture (fentanyl 15 mcg and 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine 1.4-1.6 mcg at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, adjusted to height and weight)




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Difference in the Average Numeric Rating Score (0-10 , where 0=no pain and 10= maximum pain) during the first 24 hours. [ Time Frame: 24 hours after spinal anesthesia. ]
    This is defined as the between- group difference in the average pain scores on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, as assessed by a nurse, anesthesia consultant or trainee 24 hours after spinal anesthesia.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Difference in NRS pain scores at specific time points in the first 24 hours. [ Time Frame: immediately after surgery (in PACU), 6, 12 and 18 hours after spinal anesthesia is given. ]
    This is defined as the between- group difference in the mean pain scores on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, as assessed by a nurse, anesthesia consultant or trainee immediately after surgery (in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit) and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after spinal anesthesia.

  2. Time-to-first oral opioid analgesic request [ Time Frame: Measured in hours from the time of spinal anesthetic until patient request for prescribed oral opioid analgesia, up to 24 hours from the spinal anesthetic . ]
    This is defined as the length of time between spinal anesthesia and the first time the subject requested additional opioid analgesia, up to 24 hours from the spinal anesthesia.

  3. Nausea and/or Vomiting that required treatment. [ Time Frame: Absolute number of treatments required in the 24-hour time frame. ]
    Nausea/Vomiting episodes that required pharmacological treatment in the first 24 hours after spinal anesthesia

  4. Pruritus that required treatment. [ Time Frame: Absolute number of treatments required in the 24-hour time frame. ]
    Pruritus episodes that required pharmacological treatment in the first 24 hours after spinal anesthesia

  5. Respiratory Depression [ Time Frame: In post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after spinal anesthesia ]
    Respiratory Rate measured in breaths/minute)

  6. Apgar Scores [ Time Frame: 1 and 5 minutes after birth. ]
    Neonatal Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes in a 1-10 interval scale

  7. Difference in Opioid Consumption in the first 24 hours [ Time Frame: 24 hours after spinal anesthesia. ]
    This is defined as the between-group difference in the total amount of Oral Morphine Equivalents consumed in the first 24 hours after spinal anesthesia is given.

  8. Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score ObsQoR-11 [ Time Frame: 24 hours after spinal anesthesia. ]
    11-item questionnaire applied to subjects 24 hours after spinal anesthesia. Measured in a 0-110 scale



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Gender Based Eligibility:   Yes
Gender Eligibility Description:   Female subjects that are term pregnant at the time of recruitment.
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years; American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status (ASA-PS) < 3; Term pregnancy (> 37 weeks gestational age); Elective cesarean delivery; Spinal Anesthesia;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented allergy or severe intolerance to opioids; Intra-operative conversion to a general anesthetic technique; Chronic pain syndrome with baseline pain levels >3 on a visual analogue scale (0-10 cm); History of opioid use during this pregnancy; Allergy or intolerance to NSAIDS or acetaminophen; Morbid obesity- Body Mass Index (BMI) >40.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03592992


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Ilana Sebbag, MD 519-685-8500 ext 13545 ilana.sebbag@lhsc.on.ca
Contact: Sonny Cheng, MD 519-685-8500 ext 13586 sonny.cheng@lhsc.on.ca

Locations
Layout table for location information
Canada, Ontario
Victoria Hospital- LHSC Recruiting
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
Contact: Ilana Sebbag, MD    +15196858500 ext 13545      
Sponsors and Collaborators
Lawson Health Research Institute
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Ilana Sebbag, MD Western University
Publications:

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Lawson Health Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03592992    
Other Study ID Numbers: 4357
First Posted: July 19, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: June 3, 2021
Last Verified: May 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No
Plan Description: IPD will not be shared after the end of this study other than publication of study results in medical journals.

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Pain, Postoperative
Postoperative Complications
Pathologic Processes
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations
Morphine
Hydromorphone
Analgesics, Opioid
Narcotics
Central Nervous System Depressants
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Analgesics
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents