Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Blinding and Previous Experiences of Dry Needling

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03592095
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 19, 2018
Last Update Posted : December 14, 2020
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Gracia Gallego Sendarrubias, European University of Madrid

Brief Summary:
Dry needling (DN) is a treatment technique widely used in patients with various musculoskeletal health problems due to myofascial trigger points (MTrP). DN has shown to have positive effect on pain and function in patients with mechanical neck pain. These positive results are thought to be the consequence of specific neurophysiological and mechanical processes. Research has shown that DN induces 1) end plate inhibition, 2) reduction of inflammatory substances, 3) increase of blood flow and oxygen and 4) a reduction of nociceptive afferent activity. However, the exact working mechanisms underlying DN effects is still a topic of debate. This trial addresses one of the major methodological issues in needle testing,the effects of proper blinding. DN is a specific technique that is not easily be replaced by another comparable intervention. A sham needle with a blunt tip was created that simulates penetration into the skin without actually doing so. Research about a valid method for the control in needling studies is for this reason of particular relevance. A proper blinding technique is of importance to further the field of DN.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Neck Pain Device: Dry needling Device: Placebo needle Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
The objectives of this study are to analysize short-term effects on pain intensity and pressure pain sensitivity according to previous experience (blinding) in subjects with mechanical neck pain receiving real or sham-DN and to determine the success in masking DN versus sham DN in patients with mechanical neck pain based on prior experience with this technique.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 50 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Blinding of Dry Needling Technique Based on Previous Experiences: A Double-blinded Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date : June 4, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date : November 2, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date : December 10, 2020

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: DN group
The intervention group will receive real dry needling (DN) (fast in and fast out needling technique) in an active MTrP within upper trapezius muscle.
Device: Dry needling
Real dry needling will be conducted according to Hong description, fast-in and fast-out interventions. The intervention will be applied until a total of four local twitch responses will be elicited

Placebo Comparator: Placebo needle
The placebo group will receive sham needling in an active MTrP within the upper trapezius muscle. A sham needle will be used as placebo. This needle has a blunt tip and retractable handle that created the illusion of a needle penetrating the skin.
Device: Placebo needle
Sham dry needling with be conducted with a sham needle (Steitberger's Park sham device (PSD). This needle has a blunt tip and retractable handle that created the illusion of a needle penetrating the skin. When this needle touches the skin, a pricking sensation will be created. However, when pressure will be increased, the shaft of the needle disappears into the handle creating a sensation on the patient.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Changes in Neck Pain Intensity between baseline and follow-up periods [ Time Frame: Baseline, inmediately after and 1 week after intervention ]
    The intensity of neck pain at rest and during active movement of the cervical spine in rotation will be assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS).

  2. Identification (blinding) of the needling intervention [ Time Frame: Inmediately after intervention ]
    Participants will be asked directly after the intervention whether they thought they had received a real intervention or a sham. Answering categories were: 'yes' (real DN) or 'no' (sham DN).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Changes in Pressure pain sensitivity between baseline and follow-up periods [ Time Frame: Baseline, inmediately after and 1 week after intervention ]
    Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) will be assessed at the upper trapezius muscle, spinous process of C7 and distant pain-free area of the lower extremity (heel)

  2. Changes in patients self-perceived improvement between baseline and follow-up periods [ Time Frame: Baseline and 1 week after intervention ]

    Patients self-perceived improvement will be assessed using a Global Rating of Change (GROC) consisting of a 15-point scale ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better).

    Descriptors of worsening or improving are assigned with values ranging from -1 to -7 and +1 to +7, respectively




Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 60 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-specific mechanical neck pain of at least 3 months of duration
  • Between 18-60 years old
  • At least one active trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle which referred pain reproduces the neck pain symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • whiplash injury;
  • previous cervical or thoracic surgery;
  • cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy;
  • diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome;
  • having undergone physical therapy in the previous 6 months;
  • fear to needles

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03592095


Locations
Layout table for location information
Spain
Gracia Gallego-Sendarrubias
Madrid, Rest Of The World, Spain, 28922
Sponsors and Collaborators
European University of Madrid
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Gracia Gallego Sendarrubias, Proffesor, European University of Madrid
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03592095    
Other Study ID Numbers: Hulp:5006
First Posted: July 19, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: December 14, 2020
Last Verified: December 2020

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Gracia Gallego Sendarrubias, European University of Madrid:
Dry needling
Placebo
Myofascial pain syndrome
Blinding
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Neck Pain
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations