Hemodynamic Correlates of Distinct Hypnotic States
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03568227 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : June 26, 2018
Last Update Posted : November 27, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis | Procedure: Hypnosis Procedure: Control | Not Applicable |
Despite the growing number of studies investigating of the physiological underpinnings of hypnosis by means of neuroimaging methods such as electroencephalography (EEG) positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), still no consensus exists regarding the underlying neurophysiological working mechanisms due to high levels of variability in the data.
Generally, the variability observed in research examining the neurobiological fundamentals of hypnosis could be attributed to the following characteristics:
- Heterogeneity regarding hypnotic induction procedures.
- Insufficient statistical power.
- Mono-Modality: Studies investigating the neurophysiologic mechanisms of hypnosis typically apply only one method for the investigation of their research questions. However, different techniques complement each other, hence, resulting in a more thorough understanding of the mechanisms of action.
In this project, the investigators present a multimodal approach, in which these three points are considered in order to provide a comprehensive picture with respect to psycho- and neurophysiologic fundamentals of hypnosis and proposed distinct hypnotic states.
Point 1) will be approached by applying a highly reproducible method for the hypnotic induction (OMNI-hypnosis). This hypnosis method is fast, direct and all OMNI educated hypnotherapists follow exactly the same induction procedure. This implies a high level of standardization and operationalization, crucial prerequisites to investigate the phenomenon based on scientific guidelines.
Point 2) will be addressed by including a homogeneous study sample of 50 highly suggestible participants. Furthermore, the comparably high number of 50 participants should ensure sufficient statistical power particularly in consideration of the homogeneity of the study sample.
Point 3) is addressed by following a multimodal approach combining a vast array of psychophysiological measures with multimodal neuroimaging. For that purpose, the project will be divided into three studies: A EEG- and psychophysiological study, a fMRI-study and a magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) study.
In the present study, fMRI is applied for the investigation of network dynamics associated with hypnotic states. Hypnotic states will be compared to control states which follow mock instructions matched to the hypnosis instructions.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 50 participants |
| Allocation: | N/A |
| Intervention Model: | Single Group Assignment |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Basic Science |
| Official Title: | Multimodal Investigation of Distinct Hypnotic States - A Resting-State fMRI Study |
| Actual Study Start Date : | July 13, 2018 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | September 30, 2018 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | September 30, 2018 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Healthy Subjects
The study has a 2 (Intervention: Hypnosis, Control) x 2 (State: 1 & 2) factorial within-subjects design, resulting in a total of 4 conditions. All volunteers participate at the 4 conditions in the same session.The order of the interventions is counterbalanced resulting in two possible sequences: Sequence 1: Hypnosis State 1, Hypnosis State 2, Control State 1, Control State 2 Sequence 2: Control State 1, Control State2, Hypnosis State 1, Hypnosis State 2 Volunteers will be randomly allocated to the two sequence types. |
Procedure: Hypnosis
The hypnosis intervention consists of two elements: A hypnotic induction and a hypnotic deepening. The induction aims at guiding the participant into the first hypnotic state (state 1). The participants will remain in this state for 10 minutes, the duration of the fMRI-scan. The hypnotic deepening guides the participants into a very deep hypnotic state (state 2). Participants also remain in this state for 10 minutes, during which their brain activity is measured using fMRI Procedure: Control The control intervention consists of texts corresponding to the induction and deepening of the hypnosis intervention. They are matched in duration and consist of textually matched excerpts from www.wikipedia.org. Control induction will be presented, resulting in the control state 1 (10 min). Then the control deepening will be performed, leading to the control state 2 (10 minutes). During both control states the brain activity will be recorded using fMRI. |
- Differences in resting state functional connectivity (assessed using fMRI) between the four conditions (control state 1 & 2, hypnotic state 1 & 2) [ Time Frame: 90 minutes ]
- Differences in heart rate variability (assessed during fMRI measurements) between the four conditions (control state 1 & 2, hypnotic state 1 & 2) [ Time Frame: 90 minutes ]
- Differences respiratory frequency (assessed during fMRI measurements) between the four conditions (control state 1 & 2, hypnotic state 1 & 2) [ Time Frame: 90 minutes ]
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged between 18 and 65
- Proficient in German language
- Written informed consent after being informed
- Familiar with hypnotic states of OMNI-Hypnosis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pre-existing neurological and/or psychiatric conditions
- History of brain injuries
- Alcohol and/or drug abuse
- Chronic diseases that require a permanent intake of drugs
Additional exclusion criteria for the MRI- and 1H-MRS-experiment:
- General contraindications for a participation on a MRI-Experiment (e.g. claustrophobia, pace maker, cochlea implants, insulin pumps)
- Hypersensitivity to loud noise
- Not being able to lie still during a longer period of time
- Foreign metallic objects in the body (e.g. gunshot wounds, metallic particles, metal implants, irremovable piercings)
- Pregnancy
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03568227
| Switzerland | |
| University of Zurich | |
| Zurich, Switzerland, 8032 | |
| Responsible Party: | Mike Bruegger, Senior Researcher, University of Zurich |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03568227 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
HypnoScienceMRI |
| First Posted: | June 26, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | November 27, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | November 2018 |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Hypnosis Neurophysiology fMRI Resting-State Hypnotic Sub-States |

