Ultrasound-Guided Thermocoagulation of Medial Nerve Branch in Lumbar Facet Joints Pain.
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03564418 |
|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified June 2018 by Erasme University Hospital.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : June 20, 2018
Last Update Posted : June 20, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Low Back Pain Facet Joint Pain Facet Syndrome of Lumbar Spine Chronic Low Back Pain | Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided Thermocoagulation of Lumbar facet joints Procedure: Fluoroscopy-Guided Thermocoagulation of Lumbar facet joints | Not Applicable |
Low back pain affects 70 to 80% of people at least once in their lives. They have considerable socio-economic repercussions and represent the leading medical cause of work stoppage, at around 25% .1
The articular pain between the lumbar vertebrae, called facet joints pain, represent between 15 and 45% of all low back pain and their manifestations are grouped under the name of facet syndrome including localized pains at the lumbar level as well as pains referred to the gluteal, trochanteric, inguinal and lateral and posterior region of the thigh. 2-5 The thermocoagulation of the roots innervating the lumbar facets consists in creating a lesion of the nerve roots innervating these articulations in order to block the transmission of the pain.
According to many studies this technique gives good results in 70 to 80% of the cases with an improvement around 71% to more than six months. 6 A recent Meta-analysis involving 454 patients also shows a significant improvement at 12 months of thermocoagulation versus placebo and even versus epidural lumbar. 7
To date, Lumbar Thermocoagulation are still mostly performed under fluoroscopic control by injection of contrast. This technique have proved this effectiveness, but have significant disadvantages, such as the irradiation of the patient as well as that of the practitioner because of the number of daily acts performed and its cost.
For its part, ultrasound is easily available, easy to use, represents a lower cost, and the lack of irradiation. The technique to reach the lumbar facet joints with sonography is pretty well described and known for many years. 8
We propose here to evaluate the precision of lumbar thermocoagulation performed under a transverse ultrasound approach by performing a fluoroscopic control once the needle in the desired position. The effectiveness of the technique will be assessed by measuring different pain and disability scores at six weeks post-thermocoagulation: the Visual analogue pain Scale score (VAS) and the Oswestry disability score (ODI) will be collected, compared to that of the conventional fluoroscopic technique.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 80 participants |
| Allocation: | Non-Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | Prospective, Controlled, Open trial. |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Ultrasound-Guided Thermocoagulation of Medial Nerve Branch in Lumbar Facet Joints Pain. Effectiveness and Benefits of a Non Irradiating Technique. |
| Actual Study Start Date : | January 2, 2018 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | June 30, 2018 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | July 30, 2018 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound-Guided Thermocoagulation of Lumbar facet joints
Prone position: Thanks to a high-resolution ultrasound and a 5 MHz curved probe, we will use the ultrasound technique described by Greher et al to reach the target points. Then, in order to check the correct positioning of the needles, we will inject 1 ml of a solution of contrast medium (omnipaque® 300 mg / ml of Iohexol) to observe them using the standard Fluoroscopic method. Wrongly positioned needles will be correctly repositioned and these patients will be excluded from ODI and VAS scale statistics.
|
Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided Thermocoagulation of Lumbar facet joints
Prone position: Thanks to a high-resolution ultrasound and a 5 MHz curved probe, we will use the ultrasound technique described by Greher et al to reach the target points. Then, in order to check the correct positioning of the needles, we will inject 1 ml of a solution of contrast medium (omnipaque® 300 mg / ml of Iohexol) to observe them using the standard Fluoroscopic method. Wrongly positioned needles will be correctly repositioned and these patients will be excluded from ODI and VAS scale statistics. To ensure the effectiveness of the injury by thermocoagulation, sensory electrical stimulation is performed to confirm that the needle is close to the posterior ramus (50Hz, 0-3 volts) and another electrical stimulation is performed to confirm that there is no motor stimulation (2Hz, 0-3 volts). After injecting 1 ml of 2% linisol® through the needle, denervation of the facet will be performed with an electrode at 68 ° C for 90 seconds. |
|
Active Comparator: Fluoroscopy-Guided Thermocoagulation of Lumbar facet joints
Prone position: We will use the standard fluoroscopic method to reach the target points. (maximum three levels, same side). Then, in order to check the correct positioning of the needles, we will inject 1 ml of a solution of contrast medium (omnipaque® 300 mg / ml of Iohexol). The correct location being the superolateral edge of the lateral facet and the diffusion of the contrast material at the level of the medial branch observed thanks to an anteroposterior radioscopic view. Then the location of the needles is confirmed by a lateral radioscopic view.
|
Procedure: Fluoroscopy-Guided Thermocoagulation of Lumbar facet joints
Prone position: We will use the standard fluoroscopic method to reach the target points. (maximum three levels, same side). Then, in order to check the correct positioning of the needles, we will inject 1 ml of a solution of contrast medium (omnipaque® 300 mg / ml of Iohexol). The correct location being the superolateral edge of the lateral facet and the diffusion of the contrast material at the level of the medial branch observed thanks to an anteroposterior radioscopic view. Then the location of the needles is confirmed by a lateral radioscopic view. To ensure the effectiveness of the injury by thermocoagulation, sensory electrical stimulation is performed to confirm that it is close to the posterior ramus (50Hz, 0-3 volts) and another electrical stimulation is performed to confirm that there is no motor stimulation (2Hz, 0-3 volts). After injecting 1 ml of 2% linisol® through the needle, denervation of the facet will be performed with an electrode at 68 ° C for 90 seconds. |
- Effectiveness of needle placement under ultrasound guidance [ Time Frame: Before infiltration ]Good position: G. Wrong position: W.
- Visual Analogue scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks ]0/10 (minimum) to 10/10 (maximum)
- Oswestry Disability index [ Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks ]% out of 50 questions (0/50= 0% to 50/50= 100%)
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Over the age of 18.
- Facet Syndrome.
- Symptomatology superior than 3 mounths.
- A failure of conservative treatement (drugs, physiotherapy...)
- Partial improvement after two lumbar facet infiltrations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to any of the constituents of the infiltrated product, or to the contrast medium
- Unstable medical condition: cardiac, respiratory, endocrine (uncontrolled diabetes)
- Local infection (cutaneous, perimedullary / spinal) or systemic.
- Coagulopathy (platelets <50000 / mm3, Prothrombin time <60%, INTernational normalized ratio> 1.5), anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy treatment other than aspirin.
- Lumbar arthrodesis.
- Neurological condition affecting motor function (Stroke, Parkinson...)
- Pregnant woman.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03564418
| Contact: Sebastian D Jorquera Vasquez, Medical Doctor | 0032 2 555 5816 | cseb206@gmail.com | |
| Contact: Turgay Tuna, Medical Doctor | 032 2 555 5413 | Turgay.Tuna@erasme.ulb.ac.be |
| Belgium | |
| sebastian Jorquera Vasquez | Recruiting |
| Bruxelles, Anderlecht, Belgium, 1070 | |
| Contact: sebastian Jorquera Vasquez, Medical Doctor 0032 2 5555816 cseb206@gmail.com | |
| Contact: Turgay Tuna, Medical Doctor 0032 2 5555413 Turgay.Tuna@erasme.ulb.ac.be | |
| Study Director: | Luc Van Obbergh, PhD | Chief of staff Anesthesiology |
Other Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Erasme University Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03564418 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
P2017/552 |
| First Posted: | June 20, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | June 20, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | June 2018 |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Arthralgia Back Pain Low Back Pain Pain |
Neurologic Manifestations Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases |

