Botulinum Toxin Injections for Oral Neuropathic Pain (TRIGTOX)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03555916|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : June 14, 2018
Last Update Posted : April 24, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Trigeminal Neuropathy, Traumatic||Drug: BOTOX®, Allergan Drug: Placebo||Phase 3|
Hide Detailed Description
Traumas of either physical (shocks, ballistic impacts etc.) or surgical origin are accompanied by acute pain which disappears in most cases with tissue healing. However, in some instances pain may persist in spite of an apparently normal tissue repair. Many reports have pointed to the societal impact of these neuropathic pains which is a major public health problem in Europe and in the world. In addition to the degradation of the quality of individual life that affects hedonistic, emotional, social, professional etc. dimensions of life, the economic cost to society is considerable (treatment costs, work absenteeism, loss of motivation and concentration, etc.) Among these pains, PPTTN resulting from orofacial nerve damage after physical or surgical trauma are little studied. Some studies suggest a high prevalence, ranging from 0.5 to 12% after oral surgery, including endodontic treatment (root canal treatment), simple or complex dental extractions like wisdom teeth, dental implants, and surgical interventions (cyst removal, orthognathic surgery etc.). However, despite significant advances in recent decades, pathophysiological mechanisms of these pains are still largely unknown. The majority of these pains are clinically resistant to standard analgesics and therefore extremely difficult to treat, particularly for trigeminal pain. Understanding these pains is of major interest to determine new strategies and therapeutic targets.
Symptomatology and Pathophysiology The main complaint of patients is moderate to severe and usually burning but may be stabbing. Most cases are continuous, but may report superimposed paroxysmal pain attacks. Less frequently, the pain may be short lasting with associated mechanical trigger areas, mimicking trigeminal idiopathic neuralgia. However, even in these cases, the pain attacks are usually longer than those associated with trigeminal neuralgia. Pain is unilateral and may be precisely located to the dermatome of the affected nerve with demonstrable sensory dysfunction. The pain may be diffuse and spread across dermatomes, but rarely crosses the midline. Patients may complain of a feeling of swelling, foreign body, hot or cold, local redness or flushing. Non-painful but annoying dysesthesias such as itching, numbness, etc. are often present.
From a pathophysiological point of view, the development of painful symptoms after peripheral nerve injury is related to peripheral and central changes. Damaged tissue initiate peripheral changes at the injury site that result in functional changes of neuronal, glial and vascular cells, followed by ganglionic and central changes. These changes modify both the functioning and the excitability of individual neurons and the configuration of synaptic networks, at the spinal cord/ brainstem and brain levels. These events in turn lead to genetic and epigenetic changes which translate as long term alterations of neuronal phenotypes Our research group (Team "Neuroinflammation Pain and Stress", U894, Psychiatry Centre and Neurosciences.) has been involved for many years in deciphering the actors and events contributing to the development of post-traumatic neuropathic pain, in both spinal and trigeminal models.
Treatment The diagnostic difficulty is a therapeutic challenge. During the many consultations (average of 7.5 practitioners visited), patients received different treatments: surgical, antidepressant, analgesic or alternative which are often ineffective and potentially iatrogenic and often need to be complemented by a psychotherapeutic approach.
The surgical management of patients with neuropathic pain is controversial. Indeed, the long term results of micro-neurosurgical procedures are often anecdotal, highly variable, and operator-dependent. In addition they are difficult to assess because studies are rare and involve only few patients. A thorough evaluation of these techniques is necessary and many other authors recommend stopping any surgical procedure at the site of pain and contraindicate surgery. These could indeed worsen the patient's pain.
Pharmacological treatment of PPTTN is the same as for post traumatic spinal neuropathic pain. It is symptomatic, not curative, and combines systemic medical treatment with topical treatment (anesthetics). Neuropathic pain responds little or not at all to the classical analgesics like acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and are treated by other therapeutic classes. Current treatments are based on the recommendations of different scientific societies, French (SFETD), European (EFNS) and American (APS). Treatments usually used are tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids and inhibitors of the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine. However these treatments induce many adverse effects more or less tolerated, sometimes leading to treatment discontinuation or dose reductions and impaired efficiency.
In conclusion, the diagnosis of PPTTN is difficult and is often made after extensive consultations in specialized centers. The management is unsatisfactory due to the complexity of physio-pathogenic mechanisms and the lack of specific drugs. It is most often performed by specialized practitioners and uses multidisciplinary skills (dentist, neurologist, psychiatrist and psychologist).
Hypothesis for the study Since its introduction in the 1970s for the treatment of strabismus, blepharospasm, and focal dystonia, botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has been widely used in the treatment of conditions characterized by excessive muscle contraction and/or involvement of the cholinergic system (focal dystonia, spasticity, abnormal sphincter contractions, eye movement, hyperkinetic and vegetative disorders). Many studies have also been conducted in the case of painful conditions with a muscular component following a pioneer work observing a significant decrease in pain after BTX injection. Other studies have also reported pain relief during several weeks. The neurotoxin has been used in other types of pain disorders including myofascial pain, blepharospasm, myalgia of the masticatory system (TMD), back pain, painful myoclonia, urologic, rectal or pelvic pain and cervicogenic, neurovascular and tension type headaches, and migraine. The results depend on conditions and on the dose used.
It is at the Neuromuscular junction (NMJ) that the action of botulinum neurotoxin has been the most studied. It blocks the release of acetylcholine and causes a reversible deafferentation of the motor endplate (28 days). A first recovery occurs by sprouting and the restoration of function in the initial innervation and loss of sprouts. Full recovery is achieved in about 90 days. However, this sole effect appears insufficient to explain all of the analgesic activity of the neurotoxin, demonstrated in numerous animal studies and therapeutic clinical trials.Effects on nociceptive system The effects of the neurotoxin can also be explained by effects other than on the neuromuscular system, including the nociceptive system. BTX affects the vesicular release of neurotransmitters / neuromodulators. The analgesic effect may be explained by a peripheral action by blocking the axon reflex that releases usually neuropeptides (substance P, neurokinin A, CGRP) by small diameter type C primary afferent nerve fibers and causes the phenomena of neurogenic inflammation including vasodilation and increased vascular permeability. BTX inhibits the release of substance P and glutamate and reduces the inflammatory pain induced by formalin injection. In addition, the toxin can be captured by nerve endings and transported by retrograde and orthograde axonal transport to remote sites, at the level of primary afferents termination site for example or at other sites of neuronal interaction with glial cells or other neuronal types. BoNT can therefore inhibit the release of algogenic neurotransmitters present in nociceptive primary afferent (SP, glutamate) both peripherally and centrally. BTX also decreases the expression of TRPV1 receptors on the membrane surface of nociceptors in animals, and humans. These receptors are involved in the transduction of thermal information and their activation results in a burning sensation, which is also a frequently encountered qualitative characteristic in post-traumatic neuropathic pain. Recently it has been shown that administration of BTX decreases the expression of TRPV1 in dorsal root ganglion neurons in a diabetic model of neuropathic pain. Finally, the toxin also decreases the expression of other pain receptors such as purinergic receptors P2X3. In humans, the intradermal injection of BTX-A in healthy volunteers resulted in a marked decrease in specific and painful mechanical sensitivity without changing the tactile, non nociceptive mechanoreception, without affecting the density of cutaneous innervation.
Injected in the painful area, BTX-A might therefore inhibit the release of algogenic neurotransmitters, at both the peripheral and central levels and thus reduce pain.
The proposed study will therefore explore in a double blind randomized, with two parallel groups, BTX-A vs placebo, the analgesic effects of BTX-A in PPTTN patients.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Investigator)|
|Masking Description:||Double Blind|
|Official Title:||Use of Botulinum Toxin (BTX) for the Treatment of Peripheral Painful Traumatic Trigeminal Neuropathy (PPTTN)|
|Actual Study Start Date :||April 4, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||November 2022|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||April 2023|
BOTOX®, Allergan treatment in 2 mL of saline solution (0.9% NaCl) treatment
Drug: BOTOX®, Allergan
50 U BTX-A (BOTOX®, Allergan) powder diluted in 2 mL saline solution (0.9% NaCl) administrated at visit 2 by intra oral injection
Other Name: BOTOX
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
2 mL of saline solution (0.9% NaCl) treatment
2 mL saline solution (0.9% NaCl) administrated at visit 2 by intra oral injection
- Change from baseline of self-reported average pain intensity using 11-point numerical scale (0 = no pain; 10 = maximal pain imaginable) at one month [ Time Frame: before and one month after injection ]Self-reported average pain intensity from each morning's record in a diary concerning the last 24 hours during one week, before and one month after injection
- Pain measurement with the 11-point numerical scale of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Pain recorded each morning in a diary (diary 2) concerning the last 24 hours, using the 11-point numerical scale (NS; 0 = no pain; 10 = maximal pain imaginable) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. The least, average, and maximum pain intensity during the 7 days will be collected and compared to baseline.
- Pain measurement with the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Items of the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) will be recorded during the last 24 hours on 11-points (0-10 points) numerical scales.
- Pain measurement with Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) (from 0 mm [no pain relief] to 100 mm [maximal pain relief]).
- Pain measurements with Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) (a 7-point scale rating from very much improved to very much worse) will be used .
- Areas of pain [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]The areas of main pain and referred pain will be reported directly from the patient to a soft foil, then digitized for measurement on Image J software.
- Assessment of sensory deficit according to intraoral Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]
According to the conclusions of the European task force committee for intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST), the QST is defined by :
- Brush-induced allodynia will be evaluated stroking the skin with a standardized brush and will be considered as present if evoking a clear sensation of pain. The intensity of allodynia will be recorded on a 100 mm visual analog scale. Area of Brush-induced allodynia will be traced on a transparent plastic foil, and then digitized for measurement on Image J software.
- Mechanical sensations (detection thresholds to non-painful stimuli) and pain thresholds will be measured with calibrated von Frey hairs (0.06-300gm) (Bioseb, France) (or electronic von Frey, Bioseb France).
- Thermal sensations and pain thresholds (in °C) will be assessed with a thermoalgometer (TSA II; Medoc, Israel) with an intraoral thermode by the method of limits, with baseline temperatures adjusted to the patient's skin temperature .
- Emotional state with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Emotional state using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) including 14 items scored as anxiety and depression scores (each on 21)
- Emotional state with Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Emotional state using items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
- Movement and function [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Interference with oral function will be measured with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (with the exclusion of the item "ability to walk" changed for "ability to chew" judged more relevant here) rated from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (complete interference).
- Quality of life with Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Quality of life will be assessed with specific questionnaires Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI)
- Quality of life with Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Quality of life will be assessed with specific Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)
- Quality of life with items of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]
- Incidence of BTX-A - Emergent Adverse event [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Safety of BTX-A, particularly for potential systemic adverse effects, will be assessed throughout the study. Adverse events will be declared in the case report form (CRF).
- Pain related to injections of BTX-A [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]Pain related to injections will be rated as mild, moderate, or severe.
- Time course of the pain: [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]measurement of the time course of the pain throughout the day with a diary (diary 1) in which the patient reports his/her pain every hour on a numeric scale (0-10) during 7 days.
- Thermography [ Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months ]measurement (in °C), by a camera with a thermal sensitivity
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03555916
|Contact: Yves BOUCHER, DDS,PhD||01 42 16 14 email@example.com|
|Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière||Recruiting|
|Contact: Boucher Yves, DDS, PhD 01 42 16 14 56 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||Yves BOUCHER, DDS,PhD||Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris|