Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Health Benefits of Expressive Writing: Study One (Komen)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03546673
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 6, 2018
Last Update Posted : September 4, 2019
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Herald Cancer Association
American Cancer Society, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Qian Lu, University of Houston

Brief Summary:
This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with the aim of determining the cultural sensitivity, feasibility, and effectiveness of an expressive writing intervention for Chinese breast cancer survivors.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Breast Cancer Breast Neoplasm Behavioral: Self-Regulation Condition Behavioral: Emotional Disclosure Condition Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
The study examines the potential health benefits (i.e., physical health, psychological health, and quality of life) of this expressive writing intervention for Chinese-speaking breast cancer survivors. The study also explores the mechanism through which expressive writing confers health benefits and investigates who will benefit most from the expressive writing intervention. Chinese-speaking breast cancer survivors who have completed primary treatment will be randomly assigned to a control writing condition, a self-regulation condition, or an emotional disclosure writing condition. Health outcomes are assessed at baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months follow-ups. Mixed qualitative-quantitative mixed methods are used to explore the effect of the intervention on health outcomes and explore the mechanisms that explain the benefits of this intervention.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 96 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: Expressive Writing Among Chinese Breast Cancer Survivors: Study One
Actual Study Start Date : July 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date : October 2011
Actual Study Completion Date : October 2011

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
No Intervention: Control Condition
Participants in the control group were asked to write for three weeks about facts regarding their cancer and its treatment for three sessions.
Experimental: Self-regulation Condition
For the self-regulation condition, each weekly writing assignment covers a different task. During session one, participants will be asked to write about their deepest feelings and thoughts regarding their experience with breast cancer as well as its impact on their lives; in session two, participants will be asked to write about their coping strategies to deal with stressors associated with the cancer diagnosis and treatment, as well as future plans for coping with cancer-related stressors; and in session three, participants will be asked to write about positive thoughts and feelings regarding their experience with breast cancer.
Behavioral: Self-Regulation Condition
Experimental: Emotional Disclosure condition
For the emotional disclosure condition, participants were asked to write about their deepest thoughts and feelings about their cancer experience for three weeks.
Behavioral: Emotional Disclosure Condition



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in quality of life score as assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale (FACT). [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-ups after the intervention. ]
    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale (FACT) is a 27-item measure of health-related quality of life (Cella & Tulsky,1993), which assesses perceived life quality in four different facets, including physical well-being (7 items), social well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), and functional wellbeing (7 items).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Post-traumatic stress symptoms assessed by The PTSD Symptom Scale - Self Report [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-ups after the intervention. ]
    The scale contains 17 items reflecting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition -Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (Foa, Riggs, Dancu, & Rothbaum, 1993).

  2. Change in fatigue as assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-ups after the intervention. ]
    The FACIT-F scale is a short, 13-item, easy to administer tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week (Webster et al., 2003).

  3. Change in perceived pain assessed by Brief Pain Inventory short form. [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-ups after the intervention. ]
    The Brief Pain Inventory-short form is a 9-item inventory which assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning (Cleeland, 1991).

  4. Change in sleep quality assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-ups after the intervention. ]
    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is an effective instrument used to measure the quality and patterns of sleep in adults (Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman, & Kupfer, 1989).

  5. Change in physical symptoms as assessed by the Physical Symptoms Checklist [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-ups after the intervention. ]
    The 10-item symptom questionnaire was used to assess the number of days during the last 30 days which participants had felt symptoms of acute illness such as runny nose, difficulty in breathing and soreness during the past month not due to intentional physical exercise.This measure was modified from Pennebaker (1982) and King and Emmons (1990).


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Change in positive and negative affect assessed by the Positive and negative affect scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-ups after the intervention. ]
    The scale contains 20 items that measure positive and negative affect (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988).

  2. Change in fear of cancer recurrence assessed by one item statement "I worry that my cancer will come back" [ Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-ups after the intervention. ]
    On the statement "I worry that my cancer will come back", participants rate their agreement with this statement on a 5-point scale from "not at all" to "very".

  3. Change in cancer-related morbidity [ Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention through 3 months after the intervention ]
    Patients will prospectively record all medical visits during the period from the end of intervention through the subsequent 3 months.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) having a breast cancer diagnosis
  • 2) completing primary medical treatment within four years
  • 3) being comfortable writing and speaking Chinese (i.e. Mandarin or Cantonese)

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03546673


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, California
Herald Cancer Association
Los Angeles, California, United States, 91776
United States, Texas
University of Houston
Houston, Texas, United States, 77204
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Houston
Herald Cancer Association
American Cancer Society, Inc.
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Qian Lu, Ph.D., MD University of Houston
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Qian Lu, Associate Professor, University of Houston
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03546673    
Other Study ID Numbers: 09021-02
First Posted: June 6, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 4, 2019
Last Verified: September 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Qian Lu, University of Houston:
Chinese breast cancer survivors expressive writing
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Breast Diseases
Skin Diseases