Controlling Femoral Extension and Derotation Osteotomy In Cerebral Palsy With Electromagnetic Tracking
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03528889 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : May 18, 2018
Last Update Posted : April 2, 2020
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Interal Rotation Gait Crouch Gait Cerebral Palsy Malalignment | Procedure: Femoral Extension and Derotation Osteotomy (ExtFDO) | Not Applicable |
Internal rotation crouch gait is a common deformity in patients with spastic diplegia. The treatment includes soft tissue and bony correction. Especially the bony procedures e.g. femoral extension and derotation osteotomies have proven to be effective both in short term and long term evaluation. Nonetheless there is still a relevant number of patients that suffer from over- or under-correction and recurrence over time. The reasons are diverse and include false measurement of the amount of extension and/or derotation in OR.
The study now evaluates electromagnetic tracking for femoral extension and derotation to improve these results.
The patients are recruited from the outpatients department and included if they meet the criteria.
A baseline rotational CT or MRI scan and a 3D gait analysis are performed preoperatively. The patients are randomized into a electromagnetic tracking group or a classical goniometer group. The extension and derotation are measured with the EMT system or with a classic Moeltgen goniometer in the OR. Goal is to achieve the planned amounts of extension and derotation more accurately.
The surgical procedure follows standard rules and does not need alterations because of the study.
After the operation a second CT or MRI scan is performed and the extension and derotation are precisely evaluated by two raters and later compared to the results of the intraoperative electromagnetic tracking system. One year postoperative a second 3D gait analysis is performed to measure and compare the functional and dynamic outcome.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 30 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | Randomization into two study arms:
|
| Masking: | Single (Participant) |
| Masking Description: | Patients are masked about which group they are randomized in |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Controlling Femoral Extension and Derotation Osteotomy In Cerebral Palsy With Electromagnetic Tracking - A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Actual Study Start Date : | December 1, 2017 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | June 30, 2021 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 31, 2021 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Goniometer
Extension FDO: classic procedure with goniometer controlled extension and derotation
|
Procedure: Femoral Extension and Derotation Osteotomy (ExtFDO)
Correction of malrotation of the femoral bone and flexed knee gait by osteotomy, derotation and osteosynthesis |
|
Experimental: EMT
Extension FDO: procedure with electromagnetic tracking (EMT) controlling extension and derotation
|
Procedure: Femoral Extension and Derotation Osteotomy (ExtFDO)
Correction of malrotation of the femoral bone and flexed knee gait by osteotomy, derotation and osteosynthesis |
- Comparing the mean hip rotation between the groups [ Time Frame: One year after surgery ]Measuring the functional outcome with the mean hip rotation comparing pre- and postoperative gait analysis of the patients.
- Comparing the minimum knee flexion in stance phase between the groups [ Time Frame: One year after surgery ]Measuring the functional outcome with the minimum knee flexion in stance phase comparing pre- and postoperative gait analysis of the patients.
- Comparing the anterior pelvic tilt between the groups [ Time Frame: One year after surgery ]Measuring the functional outcome with the anterior pelvic tilt comparing pre- and postoperative gait analysis of the patients.
- Comparing the pelvic rotation between the groups [ Time Frame: One year after surgery ]Measuring the functional outcome with the pelvic rotation comparing pre- and postoperative gait analysis of the patients.
- Comparing the bony derotation between the groups [ Time Frame: Shortly after surgery (not ore than 3 month) and again one year after surgery ]Measuring the actual amount of derotation in degrees in a postoperative CT or MRI scan.
- Comparing the bony extension between the groups [ Time Frame: Shortly after surgery (not ore than 3 month) and again one year after surgery ]Measuring the actual amount of extension in degrees in a postoperative CT or MRI scan.
- Evaluate the accuracy of bony derotation between the groups [ Time Frame: Shortly after surgery (not ore than 3 month) and again one year after surgery ]Comparing the the planned amount of derotation in degrees with the intraoperative electromagnetic tracking values and the postoperative rotational MRI values in degrees to evaluate the accuracy of implementing a certain amount of bony derotation.
- Evaluate the accuracy of bony extension between the groups [ Time Frame: Shortly after surgery (not ore than 3 month) and again one year after surgery ]Comparing the the planned amount of extension in degrees with the intraoperative electromagnetic tracking values and the postoperative rotational MRI values in degrees to evaluate the accuracy of implementing a certain amount of bony extension.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 6 Years to 40 Years (Child, Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cerebral palsy
- GMFCS level I-III
- Functionally disturbing internal rotation gait
- Indication for femoral derotation osteotomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- No capacity of consent
- Inability to perform all needed types examinations
- Minors: Inability of getting a MRI rotational scan (i.e. pacemaker)
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03528889
| Contact: Thomas Dreher, Prof. Dr. | +4962215625000 | thomas.dreher@med.uni-heidelberg.de | |
| Contact: Marco Götze, Dr. | marco.goetze@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
| Germany | |
| Orthopedic Department, University of Heidelberg | Recruiting |
| Heidelberg, Germany, 69118 | |
| Contact: Thomas Dreher, Prof. Dr. +4962215625000 thomas.dreher@med.uni-heidelberg.de | |
| Contact: Marco Götze, Dr. marco.goetze@med.uni-heidelberg.de | |
| Study Director: | Thomas Dreher | University Hospital Heidelberg |
| Responsible Party: | Thomas Dreher, Prof. Dr. Thomas Dreher, Heidelberg University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03528889 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
InstruExtensionFDO |
| First Posted: | May 18, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | April 2, 2020 |
| Last Verified: | April 2020 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Cerebral Palsy Nervous System Diseases Brain Damage, Chronic Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |

