Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Forearm vs Brachial Plexus Blockade for Routine Hand and Wrist Surgery

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03510559
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified September 2019 by University Health Network, Toronto.
Recruitment status was:  Recruiting
First Posted : April 27, 2018
Last Update Posted : September 27, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University Health Network, Toronto

Brief Summary:

It is very common to perform nerve blocks for hand and wrist surgery. It allows the surgeon to perform the surgery and helps with pain control after surgery. This also means only light sedation is needed for the procedure instead of a general anesthetic, which speeds up recovery time.

There are 2 types of nerve blocks that can be done for hand and/or wrist surgery. The one that is done commonly now is where the whole arm is frozen with local anesthetic. Another option is to have a nerve block where only the arm from the elbow down is frozen. Either of these types of nerve blocks can be chosen to safely accomplish surgery of the hand or wrist. However, the best nerve block for hand and/or wrist surgery has not been decided yet.

In order to determine which block is best, the investigators will be looking at patient satisfaction with the experience, as well as the surgical conditions provided and overall safety.

It is thought that many patients may prefer the arm block below the elbow as it allows for greater mobility immediately following surgery, and the surgical conditions provided will be very similar to those of the full arm nerve block.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Post-operative Pain Management Drug: Forearm Nerve Block Drug: Brachial Plexus Block Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

A randomized controlled trial involving adult patients undergoing surgery to the wrist and hand with centralized random allocation of patients to 2 groups: 1)Brachial plexus block and 2)Forearm block. The brachial plexus group will undergo a standard brachial plexus block. The forearm group will undergo a block of the proximal forearm targeting the radial sensory, ulnar, median and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerves.

Group allocation will not be blinded from the treating physicians or patients due to methodological constraints. However, the research assistants performing follow-up assessments will be blinded.

Brachial plexus anesthesia provides a reliable sensorimotor block for upper extremity surgery. It is the current gold standard of anesthesia for surgery on the hand. A forearm block is an alternative anesthetic technique. As day surgery for hand procedures is less invasive and has fewer analgesic requirements, it may be that a forearm block, which allows for preservation of upper extremity function, is of benefit for these types of procedures. It is anticipated that patients may appreciate the forearm block as opposed to a brachial plexus block as they will have greater functionality post-operatively upon returning home. This contrasts with a brachial plexus block which causes a flaccid and insensate upper extremity lasting for many hours beyond the surgical procedure longer than the anticipated analgesic requirements which may be detrimental. Conversely, a forearm block may not provide sufficient anesthesia to create a dense motor blockade, which may result in unwanted intra-operative hand movements during surgery. This could pose a significant safety concern.

A forearm block has successfully been used as a primary anesthetic in patients undergoing hand surgery, although no information has been published about patient satisfaction and events related to patient safety.

The investigators aim to assess patient satisfaction, as well as overall efficacy and safety of the forearm blocks for hand and wrist surgery, as compared to the gold standard of brachial plexus blocks.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 160 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:

Patients scheduled for ambulatory hand surgery will be assessed in the pre-operative assessment clinic at the time of surgical booking for recruitment into the study by their surgeon. A research assistant will then speak with the patient regarding the study in order to obtain informed consent for their participation.

If the patient consents to participate in the study, they will be randomized into either the brachial plexus or forearm nerve block groups. The research assistants will be blinded as to the patient's allocation and during block performance to minimize bias.

Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description: The research assistants who will be performing the follow-up assessments of the patient will be blinded as to block group allocation. No other members of the team will be blinded for this study due to methodological constraints as the end result of these blocks is very different due to upper arm weakness expected with brachial plexus blocks, but not with forearm blocks.
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: A Comparison of Forearm Versus Brachial Plexus Blockade for Routine Hand and Wrist Surgery
Actual Study Start Date : April 30, 2018
Estimated Primary Completion Date : June 1, 2020
Estimated Study Completion Date : August 1, 2020

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Brachial Plexus Block
It will be at the discretion of the anesthesiologist performing the block to choose a supraclavicular, infraclavicular or axillary block to achieve adequate surgical anesthesia of the operative arm. After sterile skin preparation with chlorhexidine, a linear array transducer probe is placed on the skin and the appropriate nerve structures are identified. Local anesthetics (30 mL of 50:50 mix of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine) will then be injected in 5 mL aliquots after negative aspiration for blood to achieve circumferential spread around the brachial plexus. Patients who have a failed brachial plexus block may undergo a rescue forearm block, and will be recorded as requiring supplemental local anesthetic.
Drug: Brachial Plexus Block
Blockade of the entire arm using local anesthetic (0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine) deposited under ultrasound guidance to facilitate performance of the surgical procedure.
Other Name: Bracial Plexus Nerve Block

Experimental: Forearm Nerve Block
Patients allocated to the forearm block will have it performed in the semi-setting position. After sterile skin preparation with chlorhexidine and infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, a linear array transducer probe is placed at the distal forearm to visualize each peripheral nerve (radial, ulnar, median, and lateral antebrachial cutaneous). A 5 cm 22 G insulated needle is then used to target each nerve individually and infiltrate 7.5mL of the 50:50 mixture (similar to the brachial plexus block group) at each nerve to a total of 30mL.
Drug: Forearm Nerve Block
Blockade of the arm below the elbow using local anesthetic (0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine) deposited under ultrasound guidance to facilitate performance of the surgical procedure.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Patient satisfaction with overall block [ Time Frame: Study coordinators will assess QoR-15 change between baseline and 24 hours after surgery ]
    The impact of surgical and anesthetic interventions on perioperative quality of life will be assessed using the QoR-15 tool (Quality of Recovery -15). The QoR-15 is a patient-based outcome measure in the form of a 15-item validated questionnaire.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Amount of intraoperative sedation required [ Time Frame: 6 hours ]
    Intraoperative sedation required by the surgical time in minutes ( from operation room arrival to discharge) for varying surgical durations

  2. Supplemental local anesthetic to block [ Time Frame: 2 hours ]
    Requirement for additional local anesthetic in the block room from the block room arrival to discharge

  3. Supplemental local anesthetic to block in operation room [ Time Frame: 6 hours ]
    Requirement for additional local anesthetic intraoperatively (mL) from operation room arrival to discharge

  4. Time in PACU [ Time Frame: 6 hours ]
    Time spent in the post-operative anesthetic care unit measured in minutes from moment of PACU arrival to discharge

  5. Surgical procedure time (minutes) [ Time Frame: 6 hours ]
    Time spent completing the surgical procedure measured in minutes from time of incision until time of surgical dressing application

  6. Block procedure time (minutes) [ Time Frame: 2 hours ]
    Time spent completing the nerve block measured in minutes from time of initial ultrasound probe contact with skin until removal of needle at block completion

  7. Analgesia provided by the nerve block [ Time Frame: 6 hours ]
    Postoperative pain severity at rest will be assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable) score during the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay.

  8. Analgesia provided by the nerve block [ Time Frame: 24 hours ]
    Postoperative pain severity at rest will be assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable) score at 24 hours post-op. Cumulative oral analgesic consumption since hospital discharge will also be measured at this time

  9. Number and severity of safety-events as measured by hand movements recorded intraoperatively [ Time Frame: 24 hours ]
    Assessing number and severity of intraoperative hand movements from time of incision until time of surgical dressing application



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consented, English-speaking, adult patients (age > 18)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III
  • BMI ≤ 38 kg/m2 (quality of US imaging deteriorates significantly with obesity)
  • Patients undergoing hand and/or wrist surgery (except wrist arthroscopy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous upper extremity nerve block
  • Contra-indication to nerve blocks e.g., infection, bleeding diathesis, allergy to local anesthetics
  • Existing chronic pain disorders or history of use of ≥ 30mg morphine or equivalent per day
  • Pre-existing neurological deficits or peripheral neuropathy involving the operative upper extremity
  • Pregnancy
  • Any significant psychiatric conditions that may affect patient assessment
  • Inability to tolerate a forearm tourniquet
  • Wrist arthroscopy surgery (requires upper arm tourniquet)
  • Inability to speak or understand English without an interpreter present

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03510559


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Rongyu Jin, MD 416-603-5800 ext 3943 Rongyu.Jin@uhn.ca
Contact: Sarah Tierney, MD sarah.tierney@one-mail.on.ca

Locations
Layout table for location information
Canada, Ontario
Toronto Western Hospital Recruiting
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
Contact: Rongyu Jin    416-603-5800 ext 2016    rongyu.jin@uhn.ca   
Sponsors and Collaborators
University Health Network, Toronto
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Ahtsham Niazi, MD University Health Network, Toronto
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: University Health Network, Toronto
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03510559    
Other Study ID Numbers: 17-6152-A
First Posted: April 27, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 27, 2019
Last Verified: September 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Pain, Postoperative
Postoperative Complications
Pathologic Processes
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations