Biodegradable Versus Titanium Nailing in Forearm Shaft Fractures in Children
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03474900 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : March 23, 2018
Last Update Posted : March 26, 2019
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Results Submitted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
There are disadvantages in Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN) of forearm shaft fractures, such as soft tissue irritation and the need of implant removal. A new mini-invasive technique of intramedullary nailing with biodegradable material (BESIN) has been developed. The nails are tapped into the medullary cavity and left in place. The aim of this study was to compare BESIN technique with ESIN.
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial including the patients (aged 5-15 years) who required operative treatment for forearm shaft fractures in two pediatric trauma centers, in Finland. The patients were randomized to be treated by BESIN or ESIN. Thirteen patients were required for each group, according to power analysis but altogether 35 were enrolled for potential drop-outs. Biodegradable polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) nails (ActivaNail ®, Bioretec ltd, Finland) were used in 19 and titanium nails (TEN ®, Synthes ltd, USA) in 16 patients. Pain and the range of motion (ROM) of forearm, elbow and wrist were primary outcomes. Radiographs and potential complications were analyzed of all and magnetic resonance imagines (MRI) of a randomly selected subgroup in BESIN group (N=13).
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Forearm Fracture | Device: PLGA implant, Bioretec ltd. Finland Device: Titanium elastic stable nail | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 35 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | The patients were randomised to 2 groups, titanium nailing or biodegradable nailing. |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Masking Description: | The patient was informed about the treatment method that he or she was randomised. The operating surgeon knew the group and treatment that the patient belonged to. |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing of Forearm Shaft Fractures by Titanium Compared With Biodegradable Nails: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial in Children With at Least Two Years of Follow-up |
| Actual Study Start Date : | February 20, 2011 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | December 31, 2018 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | December 31, 2018 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PLGA implant, Bioretec ltd. Finland
Treatment with biodegradable elastic stable intramedullary nail in unstable forearm shaft fracture in paediatric population
|
Device: PLGA implant, Bioretec ltd. Finland
The investigational implant is an ultra-high-strength biodegradable intramedullary (IM) nail of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)/tricalcium-phosphate (β-TCP) which was manufactured by Bioretec Ltd. (Hartmaninkatu 2, Tampere, Finland)
Other Name: Biodegradable elastic stable intramedullary nail |
|
Active Comparator: Titanium elastic stable nail
Treatment with titanium elastic stable intramedullary nail in unstable forearm shaft fracture in paediatric population
|
Device: Titanium elastic stable nail
Elastic stable intramedullary nail to stabilize unstable forearm shaft fractures in children
Other Name: elastic stable intramedullary nail |
- The range of motion (ROM) of forearm measured by goniometer [ Time Frame: 2 years ]The ROMs of forearm
- The range of motion (ROM) of elbow and wrist measured by goniometer [ Time Frame: 2 years ]The ROMs of elbow and wrist
- Pain measured with visual analogue scale [ Time Frame: 2 years ]general pain or pain at the fracture site in mm +/- SD , scale is from 0-100mm in visual scale where child can point the proper level of pain. 0 equals "no pain", 100 equals "the highest imaginable pain"
- Radiographic bone union [ Time Frame: 2 years ]plain radiographs in anterior posterior (AP) and lateral projections
- Radiographic bone deformity [ Time Frame: 2 years ]plain radiographs in anterior posterior and lateral projections
- Magnetic resonance imagining, bone healing [ Time Frame: 2 years ]MRIs in intervention group
- Implant degeneration in Magnetic resonance imagining [ Time Frame: 2 years ]degrading of the implant
- Magnetic resonance imagining, soft tissue reaction [ Time Frame: 2 years ]soft tissue reaction
- adverse events [ Time Frame: 2 years ]all implant or treatment related adverse events like tissue reactions or re-factures
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 5 Years to 15 Years (Child) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- suffering from single- or both-bone forearm shaft fracture
- child patient , age from 5 to 15 years
- surgical fixation needed, fracture is unstable
- cast immobilization is not rigid enough for the fracture treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- open fractures with significant soft-tissue injury
- pathological fractures
- if patient has a previous fracture or infection in the same forearm
- patients with metabolic bone diseases, systematic disease
- patient uses the medication affecting bone quality
- resistance to infection
- fractures older than 7 days
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03474900
| Finland | |
| Oulu University Hospital | |
| Oulu, Finland | |
| Principal Investigator: | Juhani Merikanto, Ph.D. associate professor | Central Finland, Central Hospital, Tampere, Finland |
Documents provided by Jaakko Sinikumpu, Oulu University Hospital:
Other Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Jaakko Sinikumpu, Head of childhood fracture and sport injury study, M.D., Ph.D., Oulu University Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03474900 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
Oulu University Hospital |
| First Posted: | March 23, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | March 26, 2019 |
| Last Verified: | March 2019 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
intramedullary nailing randomised controlled trial biodegradable children forearm shaft fractures |
|
Fractures, Bone Wounds and Injuries |

