Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Floraseal Versus Iodine Impregnated Adhesive Drapes

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03466489
Recruitment Status : Withdrawn (No participant were enrolled)
First Posted : March 15, 2018
Last Update Posted : July 22, 2019
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Osteoremedies
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Victor Hugo Hernandez, University of Miami

Brief Summary:
Infection after total joint arthroplasty can have devastating consequences. Adhesive drapes have been traditionally used at our institution to help reduce the risk of wound contamination and infection by superficial skin flora. Our primary objective is to determine if a cyanoacrylate-based sealant (FloraSeal microbial sealant) is superior to conventional iodine impregnated drapes in prevention of both superficial and deep surgical site infections in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. A prospective, randomized controlled model will be used to answer this question.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Surgical Site Infection Surgical Wound Infection Device: Floraseal Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Demand for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is increasing steadily and is projected to continue trending upwards in the coming years. Postoperative infections are a common but also potentially devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty.

Various strategies are employed both pre-operatively and post-operatively to prevent this complication. A 2011 Cochrane Review concluded that Iodine impregnated adhesive drapes had no impact on surgical site infection rate when used in various surgical procedures not specific to orthopaedics. The recent SSI prevention guidelines by the World Health Organization did not find any evidence to support the use of adhesive drapes during surgery and recommends against its use.

Currently, iodine impregnated adhesive drapes in conjunction with either chorahexadine gluconate or Iodine Povacrylex and Isopropyl Alcohol are the standard of care at our institution.

FloraSeal is a cyanoacrylate-based sealant. A cyanoacrylate microbial sealant minimizes endogenous bacteria spread to the surgical site by forming a sterile film bonded onto a patient's skin. This film, which is formed upon polymerization, prevents the spread of microorganisms. The protective mechanism is mechanical: the film traps and immobilizes microorganisms that survive on a patient's skin. It has been previously shown to effectively immobilize both gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Additionally, the sealant itself can effectively reduce the superficial bacterial burden on the skin surface and also helps reduce skin moisture buildup on skin.

Furthermore, with conventional adhesive drapes, the edges must be peeled back at the time of skin closure in order to effectively close the surgical site. It is at this moment that the incision becomes most vulnerable to penetration by local microorganisms. FloraSeal and other cyanoacrylate based sealants remain on the skin for 5 to 10 days until the superficial skin sloughs off.

Studies on sterile pig skin demonstrated FloraSeal to be more effective alone at immobilizing bacteria than incisional drapes. The efficacy was the same when FloraSeal was used with or without the incisional drapes, demonstrating that it may be used as a substitute.

Additionally, a 2013 retrospective study in revision shoulder arthroplasty demonstrated a potential reduction in positive intraoperative deep tissue cultures when using a cyanoacrylate-based microbial sealant versus the iodine impregnated incisional drapes. The study lacked sufficient power to reach significance, calling for further investigation of this effect.

Cyanoacrylate has been investigated in other surgical interventions. A 2008 prospective, randomized multicenter clinical trial in patients undergoing elective open hernia repair demonstrated cyanoacrylate-based microbial sealant independently reduced wound contamination over the course of the operation.

Due to the potentially devastating complications associated with postoperative infection, the investigators seek to find alternative methods of prevention of surgical site infection.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 0 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Randomized
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title: Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Iodine Impregnated Adhesive Drapes Versus Cyanoacrylate-Based Sealant
Actual Study Start Date : January 1, 2018
Estimated Primary Completion Date : November 1, 2019
Estimated Study Completion Date : February 1, 2020

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Iodine

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Floraseal
The surgical site will first be cleaned with isopropyl alcohol. Once the site is dry, alcohol based chlorhexidine gluconate preparatory solution will be applied to the surgical site. Once dry, the FloraSeal surgical preparatory solution will be applied per the manufacturers recommendations. The extremity will be draped in sterile fashion however adhesive drapes over the surgical site itself will not be applied.
Device: Floraseal
FloraSeal is a cyanoacrylate-based sealant used in the prevention of surgical site infections.

No Intervention: Control
The operative site is first cleaned with isopropyl alcohol. Once the site is dry, alcohol based chlorhexidine gluconate preparatory solution will be applied to the surgical site. The operative site will then be draped in sterile fashion. An iodine impregnated adhesive drape will then be applied to the surgical site.



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Appearance of Surgical Site [ Time Frame: 90 days from date of surgery ]
    The surgical incision will be checked post-operatively for signs of infection or dehiscence.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Intra-operative cultures [ Time Frame: Intra-operative - Cannot be clearly defined as it will depend on the duration of the surgical procedure. ]
    Five wound cultures will be obtained at various points during the operation to test for contamination of the surgical site

  2. Post-operative complication - Antibiotic administration [ Time Frame: 90 days from date of surgery ]
    Some surgical site infections may be managed with either intravenous or oral antibiotics. Both groups will be followed to see if either required antibiotic administration.

  3. Post-operative complication - Re-operation [ Time Frame: 90 days from date of surgery ]
    Some surgical site infections require surgical debridement. Patients will be followed to determine which patients require re-operation.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 18 years of age
  • Have signed the written informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not fluent in the language of the informed consent form
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnancy
  • Reported to have mental illness or belonging to a vulnerable population
  • History of dermatitis or allergic reaction to cyanoacrylate based materials or iodine
  • Patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty secondary to infection
  • Allergy to Iodine.
  • Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty in the setting of acute trauma

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03466489


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Florida
University of Miami Hospital
Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Miami
Osteoremedies
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Victor H Hernandez, MD University of Miami
Additional Information:
Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Victor Hugo Hernandez, Assistant Professor, Arthroplasty & Joint Reconstruction, University of Miami
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03466489    
Other Study ID Numbers: 20180222
First Posted: March 15, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: July 22, 2019
Last Verified: July 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No
Plan Description: The researchers will share aggregate data but no individual's data will be shared. De-identified graphs of the accelerometer or range of motion output recordings from the devices may be used to illustrate the device's application.

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: Yes
Keywords provided by Victor Hugo Hernandez, University of Miami:
total joint arthroplasty
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Infections
Communicable Diseases
Surgical Wound Infection
Wound Infection
Surgical Wound
Disease Attributes
Pathologic Processes
Postoperative Complications
Wounds and Injuries