Real Zero Fluoroscopy Catheter Ablation. (ZERO-Fluoro)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03458273 |
|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified September 2018 by Maciej Wójcik, MD, PhD, Medical University of Lublin.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : March 8, 2018
Last Update Posted : September 10, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
A Retrospective Propensity Matched Study comparing:
- real zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation
- conventional fluoroscopy catheter ablation without 3D system
- conventional fluoroscopy catheter ablation with 3D system
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Atrial Arrhythmia Ventricular Arrythmia Arrhythmia Arrhythmias, Cardiac | Procedure: Zero fluoroscopy ablation Procedure: Conventional ablation without 3D Procedure: Conventional ablation with 3D |
Catheter ablation is a well-established treatment to treat patients with a wide scope of heart arrhythmias.
The study is an investigator-initiated, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. The study population consists of patients with right-sided arrhythmias who underwent zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation between the years 2016 and 2018 in 3 centers and a propensity score matched patients group of patients who:
- underwent conventional fluoroscopy guided catheter ablation without 3D system (Ensite/Carto) support
- underwent conventional fluoroscopy guided catheter ablation with 3D system (Ensite/Carto) support
Covariates for matching will be:
- arrhythmia type
- age of a patient
- number of diagnostic catheters used during a procedure
- type of a diagnostic catheter used during a procedure]
| Study Type : | Observational |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 300 participants |
| Observational Model: | Case-Control |
| Time Perspective: | Retrospective |
| Official Title: | Multi-center, Observational, Retrospective Comparison of the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Real Zero Fluoroscopy Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Catheter Ablation With and Without 3D System Support: Propensity Matched Study |
| Actual Study Start Date : | March 10, 2018 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | November 2018 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 2018 |
| Group/Cohort | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Zero fluoro
Patients in whom Zero fluoroscopy ablation was performed under the guidance of Ensite for mapping and ablation and fluoroscopy will not be used during the procedure.
|
Procedure: Zero fluoroscopy ablation
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - no fluoroscopy guidance
Other Name: Zero fluoro |
|
Conventional ablation without 3D
Patients in whom Conventional fluoroscopy ablation was performed under fluoroscopic guidance only. Additional use of Ensite/Carto/Localisa for mapping was not allowed. |
Procedure: Conventional ablation without 3D
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - fluoroscopy guidance only. 3D system (Every Ensite/Carto) is not allowed
Other Name: Conventional fluoroscopy ablation without 3D |
|
Conventional ablation with 3D
Patients in whom Conventional fluoroscopy ablation was performed under fluoroscopic and Ensite/Carto guidance and ablation during the procedure. Use of fluoroscopy and additional Ensite/Carto for mapping and ablation was mandatory. |
Procedure: Conventional ablation with 3D
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - fluoroscopy guidance + 3D system support (Ensite/Carto)
Other Name: Conventional fluoroscopy ablation with 3D |
- Procedural success rates [ Time Frame: 3 months ]arrhythmia recurrence within 3 months since the index procedure
- Total procedure time [ Time Frame: during procedure ]total procedure time measured as needle to needle time
- Fluoroscopy time [ Time Frame: during procedure ]total fluoroscopy time during procedure
- Acute procedural success [ Time Frame: 10-30 minutes ]acute procedural success defined as arhhythia elimination
- Recurrence rate [ Time Frame: 6 months ]arrhythmia recurrence within 6 months since the index procedure
- Acute Complications rate [ Time Frame: during procedure ]Procedural Complications procedure
- All Complications rate [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Procedural Complications and Complications within 6 months since the index procedure
- The length of stay during the hospitalization [ Time Frame: 1 month ]Number of hospital days for ablation procedure from admission to discharge
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 16 Years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Zero fluoroscopy group: patients after right atrium/ventricle arrhythmia ablation performed with 3D (Ensite/Carto) guidance but without fluoroscopy guidance
Convectional fluoroscopy group: patients after right atrium/ventricle arrhythmia ablation performed with fluoroscopy guidance but without 3D (Ensite/Carto) guidance
Convectional fluoroscopy group + 3D: patients after right atrium/ventricle arrhythmia ablation performed with fluoroscopy guidance and with 3D (Ensite/Carto) guidance
Inclusion Criteria:
- right atrial tachycardia
- right atrial premature complexes
- AVNRT
- right atrial AVRT/WPW
- right ventricle tachycardia / right ventricle premature complexes
Exclusion Criteria:
- left atrium arrhythmia
- left ventricle arrhythmia
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03458273
| Contact: Maciej Wójcik, MD, PhD | +48817244151 | m.wojcik@umlub.pl |
| Poland | |
| Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczn | Recruiting |
| Biała Podlaska, Poland, 21-500 | |
| Contact: Maciej Wójcik, MD,PhD +48817244151 m.wojcik@umlub.pl | |
| Medical University of Lublin | Recruiting |
| Lublin, Poland, 20-091 | |
| Contact: Maciej Wójcik, MD, PhD +48817244151 m.wojcik@umlub.pl | |
| SP ZOZ Szpital Puławy | Recruiting |
| Puławy, Poland, 24-100 | |
| Contact: Maciej Wójcik, MD, PhD +48817244151 m.wojcik@umlub.pl | |
| Principal Investigator: | Maciej Wójcik, MD, PhD | Medical University of Lublin, Poland |
Other Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Maciej Wójcik, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Medical University of Lublin |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03458273 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
MW-MULublin-2 |
| First Posted: | March 8, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | September 10, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | September 2018 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Atrial Arrhythmia Ventricular Arrythmia ablation fluoroscopy |
|
Arrhythmias, Cardiac Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Pathologic Processes |

