Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Reduction of Post-endodontic Pain After RCT When Intracanal Cryotherapy is Used. (PEP)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03448263
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 28, 2018
Last Update Posted : February 28, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Jorge Paredes Vieyra, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California

Brief Summary:
The goal of this research was to relate the occurrence of post-endodontic pain after single-visit RCT using Balanced Force technique and two reciprocating system when cryotherapy is used. Methodology: All 216 patients had upper or lower molar, premolar or anterior teeth selected for conventional RCT for prosthetic reasons detected with only vital pulps. Of the sample of 216 teeth, were selected to the 3 instrumentation methods. For hand instrumentation, Balanced Force were used. All canals were clean and shaped with hand Flex-R files (fMoyco/Union Broach, York PA, USA). For mechanical shaping, all instruments were used with a micro motor (VDW, Munich Germany). WaveOne and Reciproc instruments. Final irrigation with cold (6oC) 17% EDTA served as a lubricant.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Post Operative Pain Procedure: Balanced Force technique Procedure: WaveOne technique Procedure: Reciproc technique Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Patient selection Two hundred and sixteen of 245 patients (119 women and 97 men) aged 18-65 years were incorporated in this research while 29 were excluded as not meeting the inclusion criteria. (Fig. 1). Sample size estimate was achieved according with a method for this specific purpose (Cochran's method, 1986). Therefore, the 56 teeth allocated to each group were adequate to confirm an essential sample size.

For hand instrumentation, the Balanced Force technique was used. All root canals were shaped with hand Flex-R files (Moyco/Union Broach, York PA, USA). Gates-Glidden drills (Dentsply Maillefer) sizes #2 and #3 were used at the orifice of the root canals. For mechanical preparations, all instruments were used with a micro motor (VDW Silver Motor, VDW, Munich Germany). Torque and rotation were preset for each Reciproc or WaveOne instrument. Rotary Ni-Ti instruments were used in continuous brushing rotary motion and reciprocating mode respectively.

Dentinal debris was eliminated from the file with a gauze, instantaneously to the instrument change (WaveOne) or after 2-3 in-and-out (pecking) movements (Reciproc) following the manufacturers' recommendations. Each root canal was irrigated with 2.5mL 2.6% NaOCl. Irrigation was performed using a 24-gauge needle (Max-I-Probe; Tulsa Dental, York, PA) and a 31-G NaviTip needle (Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, UT) when reaching the WL after each instrument insertion.

Group BF. For the Balanced Force group, the root canals were shaped and shaped using a #40 instrument for thin or curved canals and a #55 file for wide canals.

Group WON. For the WaveOne group, a file size 25/.08 was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and a file size 40/.08 was used for large and wide canals.

Three in-and-out pecking motions were used with an amplitude of not more than 3 mm until reaching the estimated working length.

Group REC. The R25 (size 25/ .08) instrument was used in thin and curved root canals, and R40 files (40/ .06) were used in wide root canals. Three in-and-out pecking motions were used with an amplitude of not more than 3 mm until reaching the estimated working length.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 216 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Random Selection of instrumentation groups. Of the sample of 216 teeth, 72 were randomly assigned to the one of the 3 instrumentation methods. Treatment was performed by 3 experienced endodontists; each prepared 72 teeth, 24 per technique.
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Masking Description: Certified endodontists trained in the procedures, devices, and systems investigated took part in the research. All experts tracked a pre-established procedure for the Balanced Force technique, WaveOne, and Reciproc instrument systems.
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Reduction of Post-endodontic Pain After Single-visit RCT Using Balanced Force and Two Reciprocating System When Intracanal Cryotherapy is Used.
Actual Study Start Date : January 4, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date : January 5, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : February 6, 2018

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Group BF
The root canals were cleaned and shaped using a #40 instrument for thin or curved canals and a #55 file for widespread canals.
Procedure: Balanced Force technique
Flex-R files sizes 15-45 taper .02 were used according to the technique on each tooth

Procedure: WaveOne technique

WaveOne instrument was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and file (40.08) was used for large canals.

Three in-and-out motions were used with lengths not beyond 3 mm in the three thirds of the canal until reaching the estimated WL.


Procedure: Reciproc technique
Reciproc files were used in wide canals. Three in-and-out motions were used with lengths not beyond 3 mm in the three thirds of the canal until reaching the estimated WL.

Experimental: Group WON
WaveOne files was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and a file (40.08) was used for large and wide canals.
Procedure: Balanced Force technique
Flex-R files sizes 15-45 taper .02 were used according to the technique on each tooth

Procedure: WaveOne technique

WaveOne instrument was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and file (40.08) was used for large canals.

Three in-and-out motions were used with lengths not beyond 3 mm in the three thirds of the canal until reaching the estimated WL.


Procedure: Reciproc technique
Reciproc files were used in wide canals. Three in-and-out motions were used with lengths not beyond 3 mm in the three thirds of the canal until reaching the estimated WL.

Experimental: Reciproc instruments
Reciproc instrument was used in thin and curved RC, and R40 files (40.06) were used in wide canals.
Procedure: Balanced Force technique
Flex-R files sizes 15-45 taper .02 were used according to the technique on each tooth

Procedure: WaveOne technique

WaveOne instrument was used to prepare narrow, straight and curved canals, and file (40.08) was used for large canals.

Three in-and-out motions were used with lengths not beyond 3 mm in the three thirds of the canal until reaching the estimated WL.


Procedure: Reciproc technique
Reciproc files were used in wide canals. Three in-and-out motions were used with lengths not beyond 3 mm in the three thirds of the canal until reaching the estimated WL.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Evaluate the post-endodontic pain after single-visit After the root canal treatment with Balanced Force technique and two reciprocating system. [ Time Frame: 24 hrs ]
    Post-endodontic pain was evaluated when the RCT developed with hand and rotary instruments


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Use of intracanal cryotherapy on post-endodontic pain after single-visit RC [ Time Frame: 24 hrs ]
    A final irrigation after root canal treatment was made with cold 3cc of (6oC) 17% EDTA gently delivered to the WL using a cold (6oC) sterile metallic micro cannula.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

The principal inclusion parameters were:

  • absence of radiographic sign of apical periodontitis and a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis (IP) established by affirmative response to hot and cold examinations.
  • Thermal pulp examination was achieved by the corresponding author, and radiographic analysis was established by 3 certified endodontists.
  • Clinical requirements were established on the next conditions: 1) The purposes and necessities of the research were spontaneously accepted. 2) Clinical Management was pointed to patients in physical and mental well-being. 3) All teeth had vital pulps and absence of apical periodontitis. 4) Positive thermal stimulation with EndoIce (Hygenic Corp, Akron, OH). 5) Teeth with enough coronal structure for rubber dam isolation. 6) No RCT done before the research. 7) No painkillers or antibiotics used 7 days' prior the clinical events started

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion parameters were:

  • the necessity for retreatment
  • gravidity
  • impossibility to obtain patient's approval
  • patients who didn't complete inclusion necessities
  • a history of medication for chronic pain or those compromising the immune response
  • patients younger than 18 years and the existence of mishaps or difficulties during RCT (calcified canals, impracticality of achieving AP in any canal).

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03448263


Locations
Layout table for location information
Mexico
Jose Clemente Orozco
Tijuana, BC, Mexico, 22000
Sponsors and Collaborators
Universidad Autonoma de Baja California
Publications of Results:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Jorge Paredes Vieyra, JORGE PAREDES VIEYRA D.D.S., MsC, PhD, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03448263    
Other Study ID Numbers: Endo Pain 2018
First Posted: February 28, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 28, 2018
Last Verified: February 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Jorge Paredes Vieyra, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California:
pain
post endodontic pain
root canal treatment
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Pain, Postoperative
Postoperative Complications
Pathologic Processes
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations