Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Improve the Absolute Walking Distance in Patients With Intermittent Claudication Compared to Best Available Treatment? (NESIC)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03446027
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : February 26, 2018
Last Update Posted : July 16, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Imperial College London

Brief Summary:
Intermittent claudication (IC) is caused by a blockage in the artery of the leg, causing muscle pain. Although some evidence of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the management of patients with IC exists, further high quality research is required. This proposed study is vital to identify the contribution of clinical change using NMES, compared to the current gold standard recommended practice of supervised exercise therapy (SET) and, actual standard of care offered in the majority of the UK and Ireland, including best medical therapy (BMT). The device is expected to increase the walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication (IC), and therefore have a benefit on the same when provided in addition to supervised exercise programmes. It is also expected to cause a reduction in pain symptoms and reduced likelihood of major intervention in late stage peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The principal research objective is to assess the clinical efficacy of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device as an adjunct to the local standard care that is available at the study randomisation sites, in order to improve walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication (IC).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Intermittent Claudication Peripheral Vascular Diseases Device: NMES Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 200 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Study: Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Improve the Absolute Walking Distance in Patients With Intermittent Claudication (NESIC) Compared to Best Available Treatment?
Actual Study Start Date : February 16, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 31, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : September 30, 2021

Arm Intervention/treatment
No Intervention: Control
There will be no change to the local site standard of care for patients with IC attributed to participation in this trial. Those sites with Supervised Exercise Therapy (SET) will continue to provide this intervention as per their normal standard of care and locally agreed protocol.
Experimental: Device
Local therapy + Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES)
Device: NMES
NMES device to be used for up to 3 hours daily in 30 minute sessions for 3 months.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Absolute walking distance (AWD) [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
    measured by treadmill testing


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Initial claudication distance (ICD) [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
    measured by treadmill testing

  2. Quality of life - Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months ]
    Patient questionnaire. Used to assess change in disease-specific QoL.

  3. Quality of life - EuroQoL 5D (EQ5D) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months ]
    Patient questionnaire. Used to assess the generic QoL and will allow economic assessment based on intervention and score improvement.

  4. Quality of life Short Form 36 (SF-36) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months ]
    Patient questionnaire. Used to assess the generic QoL and will allow economic assessment based on intervention and score improvement.

  5. Haemodynamic assessment - Duplex ultrasonography [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months ]
    Using an arterial ultrasound probe and pre-set volume flow algorithms on a duplex ultrasound machine, flow within the common femoral artery (CFA), of the most affected limb, will be measured, approximately 5cm below the mid-inguinal point at the groin. Measures include volume flow (VF, cc/min) and time-averaged mean volume (TAMV, cm/s) to assess whether using the device increases these measurements.

  6. Haemodynamic assessment - Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months ]
    The single fibre laser optical probe of the LDF machine will be positioned on the dorsal aspect of the foot using single use adhesive pads. Flux, as a measure of superficial skin blood flow will be measured to assess whether using the device increases this measurement.

  7. Haemodynamic assessment - Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months ]
    The single fibre laser optical probe of the LDF machine will be positioned on the dorsal aspect of the foot using single use adhesive pads. Skin surface temperature will be measured to assess whether using the device increases this measurement.

  8. Haemodynamic assessment - Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months ]
    The brachial blood pressure from the right arm using a manual blood pressure monitor cuff and Doppler will be recorded after 5 minutes of resting supine on a couch. The systolic blood pressure of the anterior tibial artery and posterior tibial artery at the ankle will also be recorded using the cuff and Dopplermethod. The ratio of the systolic brachial and ankle pressures will form the ABPI measurement.

  9. Health economic assessment [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 month, 6 month and 12 months ]
    The economic analyses will compare local therapy (SET or EA only) versus the intervention (local therapy + Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, NMES) in patients with Intermittent Claudication. The analyses will be based on a (i) patient level in-trial cost-effectiveness analysis, (ii) a decision model and (iii) budget impact assessment. The in-trial analysis will calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over the one year time horizon of the trial.

  10. Compliance with interventions [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
    Comparison of compliance with NMES device compared to SET classes. NMES compliance data collected from the data logger fitted to device and patient diary will be combined to report overall compliance.

  11. Device experience questionnaire [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
    To report ease of device use and suggest any developments.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Capacity to provide informed consent
  • Aged 18 or above
  • Positive Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire
  • ABPI <0.9 OR positive stress test (fall in ankle pressure >30mmHg, 40 secs post 1 min treadmill at 10% gradient, 4 km/h)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe IC requiring invasive intervention as determined by the treating clinician
  • Critical limb Ischaemia as defined by the European Consensus Document
  • Co-morbid disease prohibiting walking on a treadmill or taking part in supervised exercise therapy.
  • Popliteal entrapment syndrome
  • Commenced vascular symptom specific medication in previous 6 months e.g. naftidrofuryl oxalate, cilostazol
  • Pregnancy
  • Any implanted electronic, cardiac or defibrillator device
  • Acute deep vein thrombosis
  • Broken or bleeding skin including leg ulceration
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Recent lower limb injury or lower back pain

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03446027


Locations
Layout table for location information
United Kingdom
The Royal Bournemouth & Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Bournemouth, United Kingdom
North Bristol NHS Trust
Bristol, United Kingdom, BS10 5NB
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Dorchester, United Kingdom
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hull, United Kingdom, HU3 2JZ
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom, W2 1NY
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG7 2RD
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Taunton, United Kingdom, TA1 5DA
Sponsors and Collaborators
Imperial College London
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Imperial College London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03446027    
Other Study ID Numbers: 17HH4216
First Posted: February 26, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: July 16, 2021
Last Verified: July 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Vascular Diseases
Intermittent Claudication
Peripheral Vascular Diseases
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Cardiovascular Diseases
Arteriosclerosis
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Atherosclerosis