Evaluation of an Automatic Segmentation Software (Pixyl.Neuro) to Track Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Via Cerebral MRI (PIXCIS)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03438357 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Active, not recruiting
First Posted : February 19, 2018
Last Update Posted : December 16, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Multiple Sclerosis Clinically Isolated Syndrome | Other: Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation software |
| Study Type : | Observational |
| Actual Enrollment : | 200 participants |
| Observational Model: | Case-Only |
| Time Perspective: | Retrospective |
| Official Title: | Evaluation of an Automatic Segmentation Software (Pixyl.Neuro) to Track Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Via Cerebral MRI |
| Actual Study Start Date : | January 2, 2019 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | November 2022 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | November 2022 |
| Group/Cohort | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Patients with multiple sclerosis |
Other: Analysis of cerebral MRI with automatic segmentation software
Pixyl.Neuro software versus manual analysis of lesions |
- Lesions detected by Pixyl.Neuro software that were missed by manual analysis of MRI images follow-up images compared to reference image (new T2 lesions, enlarging T2 lesions, new T1 gadolinium lesions) [ Time Frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years) ]% cases
- Inter-reader reproducibility [ Time Frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years) ]DICE similarity coefficient between readers
- Software versus manual analysis reproducibility for same reader [ Time Frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years) ]DICE similarity coefficient between software result and manual result
- Classification of discordances [ Time Frame: baseline until follow-up (maximum 2 years) ]Specific description of missed lesions according to technology at fault
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 56 Years (Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Identical to those of the study D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166:
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for 24 months of follow-up
- The patient has had a classic CIS with the past 90 days
- Reference cerebro-medullary MRI scheduled within the 90 days after the beginning of symptoms
- With MRI (cerebro ± medullary) showing demyelination according to spatial spread criteria by Swanton (2006):
- At least 1 lesion in at least 2 of the 4 following territories: (1) Peri-ventricular; (2) Juxta-cortical; (3) Sub-tentorial; (4) Medullary
- No other suspected pathology
- Vitamin D level in blood less than 100 nmol / l at the pre-inclusion visit
- Women of childbearing potential must use very effective contraception for the duration of the study. A very effective contraceptive method is defined as a method resulting in a low failure rate (that is to say less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, IUDs, sexual abstinence, or partner with a vasectomy.
Randomisation stratification criteria:
• The patient can also also meet the temporal dissemination criteria defined according to McDonald criteria 2010 (Polman et al., 2011), because this condition is currently not sufficient for prescribing a background treatment: Simultaneous presence of at least one asymptomatic lesion taking on contrast and at least one asymptomatic lesion not taking on contrast after injection of gadolinium
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient is participating in another study other than D-Lay-MS: NCT01817166 (this criteria does not apply to the POLAR study (RCB 2011-A01269-32); patients included in this study may simultaneously participate in the POLAR study)
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
- Major medical or psychiatric illness that, according to the investigator, would result in the patient running an unnecessary risk or that could affect compliance with the study protocol
- Vitamin D insufficiency linked to currently active digestive or more general diseases (celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal bypass, short bowel syndrome, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, hyperthyroidism, rickets, hypoparathyroidism, cancer, granulomatous diseases and lymphomas)
- Moderate or severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance less than 60 ml / min)
- Epilepsy not adequately controlled by treatment
- Any illness requiring chronic treatment with corticosteroids
- Patient with osteoporosis or history of osteopenia
- Pathology requiring calcium intakes greater than 1 gram per day
- Current or past history of hypercalcemia
- Medications that affect the metabolism of vitamin D other than corticosteroids; e.g. anticonvulsants [phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin] rifampicin, isoniazid, ketoconazole, 5-FU and leucovorin, thiazide diuretics.
- Situations accompanied by increased vulnerability to hypercalcemia, e.g. arrhythmia or known heart disease, treatment with digitalis, and subjects with nephrolithiasis.
- Contraindications to vitamin D3 as mentioned in the documentation for UVEDOSE
- Known hypersensitivity to gadolinium and / or known inability to undergo an MRI (pacemaker, osteosynthesis material, intraocular metal splinter, etc ....).
- The subject is participating in an interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- The subject refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03438357
| France | |
| CHU Nimes | |
| Nîmes, France, 30029 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Eric Thouvenot | CHU Nimes |
| Responsible Party: | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03438357 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
IDIL/2017/ET-01 |
| First Posted: | February 19, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | December 16, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | December 2021 |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Multiple Sclerosis Sclerosis Pathologic Processes Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System |
Nervous System Diseases Demyelinating Diseases Autoimmune Diseases Immune System Diseases |

