Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Popliteal Approach to Sciatic Nerve Block Is Not Inferior to Infragluteal Approach

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03410888
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 25, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 25, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University Health Network, Toronto

Brief Summary:
Study Hypothesis The investigators approach to demonstrate noninferiority of analgesia provided by popliteal block in TKA surgery will be based on a hypothesis of absence of a clinically significant difference in pain visual analogue sores (VAS) between the analgesia provided by the popliteal block and that of the infragluteal sciatic block in TKA surgery patients.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Neuromuscular Blockade Procedure: Popliteal approach Procedure: Infragluteal approach Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Sciatic nerve block provides clinically significant analgesic benefits following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These benefits include a reduction in pain scores and decrease analgesic requirements.

Despite these benefits, sciatic nerve block has remained among the least performed peripheral nerve block by anesthesiologists. Some impediments relating to single shot sciatic nerve block (SSNB) that may cause anesthesiologists to avoid it include, patient discomfort due to needle passage through dense gluteal or thigh adipose and musculature, and unreliable success because of difficulty in localizing the sciatic nerve (particularly in obese patients).

Even in the current era of US guidance, sciatic nerve block remains a challenge. Despite its helpfulness, ultrasound technology remains hindered by an intrinsic limitation: a trade off between depth of penetration and image resolution; therefore, it works well for superficial blocks but becomes less useful when deep structures are imaged-ironically where this guidance is needed most. The challenge of anatomical depth, as in the case of the sciatic nerve, is one remaining challenge that dictates practical restrictions on the patterns of practice of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Actually, the recommendations of the Joint Committee for Education and Training composed of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and the European Society of Regional Anesthesia cite the depth of block resulting in degradation of both ultrasound and needle image as the first among other causes that increase the level of difficulty of a nerve block.

As the sciatic nerve travels caudally in the body, it becomes more superficial with less thickness of tissue separating it from skin surface, making distal sciatic nerve block an attractive alternative. Indeed, both articular branches which provide sensory innervation to the knee joint as well as its muscular branches which provide innervation to the muscles surrounding knee joint most commonly arise from the sciatic nerve either at the knee level, or just above the knee or within the popliteal fossa.

Blockade of the sciatic nerve at the level of the popliteal fossa, commonly termed a popliteal block, is technically easier to perform than gluteal sciatic block and may even be associated with less risk of intravascular injection and nerve injury. Indeed, popliteal block has been reported to provide good postoperative analgesia in total knee replacement and other major knee surgery. However, the small posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh, which supplies only the skin on the back of the thigh and knee, separates from the sciatic nerve proximally and variably in the gluteal region, and will be spared in more distal approaches. It is for this reason why many practitioners are hesitant to perform distal sciatic nerve blocks for TKA. However, the relative importance of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh for post-operative analgesia following TKA is unknown and maybe clinically insignificant.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 16 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Popliteal Approach to Sciatic Nerve Block Provides Postoperative Analgesia That Is Not Inferior to That of the Infragluteal Approach in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia
Actual Study Start Date : August 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date : January 2012
Actual Study Completion Date : January 2012

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: popliteal approach
Blockade of the sciatic nerve at the level of the popliteal fossa.
Procedure: Popliteal approach

Popliteal approach:

Under ultrasound guidance a 50 to 90 mm 22 G needle is inserted in and advanced to contact the target nerve until nerve movement is detected. The end point of nerve block in this group is obtaining a circumferential local anesthetic spread around the sciatic nerve.


Active Comparator: infragluteal approach
Blocking the sciatic nerve at the subgluteal level.
Procedure: Infragluteal approach
Infragluteal approach: The patients in this group will receive sciatic bock according to the approach described by Chan et al. Ultrasound scanning will be used to identify and mark the greater trochanter laterally and the ischial tuberosity medially. The sciatic nerve is usually found anterior (deep) to the gluteus maximus muscle and lateral to the origin of the biceps femoris muscle at the ischial tuberosity as well as medial to the greater trochanter. The end point of nerve block in this group is obtaining a circumferential local anesthetic spread around the sciatic nerve.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Visual analogue pain scores. The score at 6 hours will be considered as primary outcome. [ Time Frame: 6 hours ]
    Overall pain level as well as pain localized o the back of the knee will be assessed at rest and on movement (knee flexion) and will be quantified with a 100 mm VAS pain scale score, with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the worst imaginable pain.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Sensory/Motor block onset assesment in the sciatic nerve distribution [ Time Frame: 60 minutes ]
    The onset of sensory block will be assessed in the sciatic nerve distribution within 60 minutes of local anesthetic injection.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 85 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Scale I-III patients undergoing unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia and nerve blocks
  • Ages 18-85
  • BMI ≤ 38 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain disorders
  • Significant pre-existing neurological deficits or peripheral neuropathy affecting the lower extremity
  • Abuse of drugs or alcohol
  • Allergies to any medication included in the study protocol
  • Contraindication to spinal anesthesia or failure to institute spinal anesthesia after performing femoral and sciatic blocks
  • Bilateral TKA surgeries
  • History of significant psychiatric conditions that may affect patient assessment
  • Pregnancy

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03410888


Locations
Layout table for location information
Canada, Ontario
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
Sponsors and Collaborators
University Health Network, Toronto
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Richard Brull, MD University of Toronto
Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: University Health Network, Toronto
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03410888    
Other Study ID Numbers: 11-0306-B
First Posted: January 25, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: January 25, 2018
Last Verified: January 2018
Keywords provided by University Health Network, Toronto:
sciatic nerve block
infragluteal approach
popliteal approach