Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Lenabasum in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (RESOLVE-1)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03398837|
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : January 16, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 13, 2020
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis||Drug: Lenabasum 5 mg Drug: Lenabasum 20 mg Other: Placebo oral capsule||Phase 3|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||365 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Investigator)|
|Official Title:||A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Lenabasum in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis|
|Actual Study Start Date :||December 18, 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||March 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||March 2020|
Experimental: Cohort 1
Lenabasum 5 mg BID
Drug: Lenabasum 5 mg
Subjects will receive lenabasum 5 mg twice daily.
Experimental: Cohort 2
Lenabasum 20 mg BID
Drug: Lenabasum 20 mg
Subjects will receive lenabasum 20 mg twice daily.
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 3
Other: Placebo oral capsule
Subjects will receive placebo twice daily.
- Efficacy of lenabasum compared to placebo for the American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index in diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis score. [ Time Frame: American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index score through study completion, up to 1 year. ]The ACR CRISS exponential algorithm determines the predicted probability of improvement from baseline, incorporating change in mRSS, FVC % predicted, physician and patient global assessments, and HAQ-DI. The outcome is a continuous variable between 0.0 and 1.0 (0 - 100%). A higher score indicates greater improvement.
- Efficacy of lenabasum compared to placebo for the change from baseline in modified Rodnan skin score. [ Time Frame: Change from baseline through study completion, up to 1 year. ]mRSS evaluates a subject's skin thickness on a 4 point scale for 17 surface anatomic areas: 0 = normal skin; 1 = mild thickness; 2 = moderate thickness; 3 = severe thickness with inability to pinch skin into fold. The individual values of the 17 surface areas are summed to define the total skin score with a maximum score of 51.
- Efficacy of lenabasum compared to placebo for the change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index. [ Time Frame: Change from baseline through study completion, up to 1 year. ]It includes 8 sections: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 2 or 3 questions for each section. Scoring within each section is from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The individual scores of the eight sections are summed and divided by 8. The result is the disability index or functional disability index. A higher score indicates more functional disability.
- Efficacy of lenabasum compared to placebo for the change from baseline in forced vital capacity. [ Time Frame: Change from baseline through study completion, up to 1 year. ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03398837
|Principal Investigator:||Robert Spiera, MD||Professor of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College|
|Principal Investigator:||Chris Denton, MD||Professor of Experimental Rheumatology and Consultant Rheumatologist and Centre Head, Royal Free Hospital|