Time Difference Between Onsets of Lateral And Medial Hamstring Muscles During Gait in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain.
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03392688 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : January 8, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 8, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Patellofemoral Pain | Other: kujala patellofemoral pain scale Diagnostic Test: Surface EMG Other: Q angle measurement | Not Applicable |
Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a very common complaint in younger population with still unclear and controversial etiology. It was suggested that a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors cause PFP. The strain of the retropatellar subcondral bone caused by excessive lateral patellar tracking is known to be the one among intrinsic factors (Thomee R.1999). Imbalance of the dynamics between knee extensor muscles, Vastus Medialis (VM) and Vastus Lateralis (VL), has also received a great research interest during last 10 years. However, uneven timing between onsets of counterpart knee flexor muscles, Lateral and Medial hamstring, were just considered as a possible etiological factor of the PFP (Patil S.2011), yet this hypothesis remains to be proven. The investigators aimed to investigate whether there is a relative time delays of the LH (biceps femoris, BF) and MH (semitendinosus, ST) during the walking at the self-selected speed in patients with patellofemoral pain. Even though dynamic EMG investigations are challenging because of cross-talks between muscles, hence difficult to determine clearly onset times, the investigators think that any information acquired during walking would be highly important because patellofemoral pain is mainly exaggerated by dynamic activities.
15 patients who were diagnosed with PFP (age 28.73±7.44, height 169.73±7.09, weight 67.47±14.31) and 15 asymptomatic subjects (age 30.47±6.22, height 167.87±7.81, weight 67.87±13.48) were recruited in the study. The inclusion criteria for PFP subjects was presence of the anterior and retropatellar pain for minimum 2 months scaled as 3 in accordance with Numeric Analog Scale during at least two of the following activities: stair descending, ascending, squatting, prolonged sitting, jumping, sitting on the knees. Surface EMG was recorded from Medial Hamstring and Lateral Hamstring muscles at 1000 Hz sampling rate during walking at participants' normal walking speed. EMG data obtained from 5 gait trials were evaluated. The EMG traces were full wave rectified and low pass filtered at 50 Hz. Delay in timing before heel strikes between MH and LH was calculated. Statistical significance between differences in time delays was analysed using "paired sample t-test".
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 30 participants |
| Allocation: | Non-Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | Participants which were included in the study were divided into 2 groups as patient group who included the patients diagnosed with Patellofemoral pain and asymptomatic group which was considered as control group. |
| Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
| Masking Description: | The algorithm used to calculate the onset of the EMG was identified according to the point at which the signal deviated by more than three times standard deviations, for a minimum of 25 ms from the baseline level (computing started 200 ms prior to the start of walking). MatLab program (R2011 version) was used for design a custom made program for data analysis. Additionally to automatic calculation, all data was visually checked to ensure that there was no signal noise, deteriorating the signal analysis, possibly caused by the movement artefact. A blind assessor visualy checked the onsets of the MH and LH muscles and record the onset time. |
| Primary Purpose: | Screening |
| Official Title: | Is There a Time Difference Between Onsets of Lateral and Medial Hamstring Muscles During Gait in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Comparing to Healthy Subjects? |
| Actual Study Start Date : | January 21, 2014 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 30, 2015 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | July 1, 2015 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Patellofemoral pain group
Diagnosis of PFP was established based on symptoms, physical examination performed by an orthopedic surgeon. Patients were also screened through physical examination to rule out ligamentous or meniscal injuries, patellar tendinitis and knee joint effusion by an orthopedic surgeon. All patients also underwent a radiologic examination consisting of AP, lateral and tangential radiograms. Surface EMG, Kujala patellofemoral pain scale, Q angle measurement were administered to the PFP group. |
Other: kujala patellofemoral pain scale
Kujala patellofemoral pain scale was used to evaluate knee functions of the PFP subjects. Diagnostic Test: Surface EMG The surface EMG electrodes (silver/silver chloride, pre-gelled, Ambu Blue Sensor, Denmark) (Konrad P.) with an interelectrode distance of 20 mm between centers were used to record an EMG signal during walking. Portable 8 channel (TELEEMG, BTS, Milan, Italy) with built in x10 amplifications, 10-450 Hz bandpass and sampling rate of 1000 Hz were used for recording. The location and orientation of the electrodes for each MH (ST) and LH (BF) were identified according to SENIAM (Surface ElectromyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles) criteria. Other: Q angle measurement Q angle measurement was applied to both patellofemoral pain and control group subjects in standing position. |
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
Control group had similar demographic characteristics with PFP group, and neither one of the controls had any knee pathology or current knee pain or effusion that would effect the gait. Surface EMG, Q angle measurement were administered to the control group. |
Diagnostic Test: Surface EMG
The surface EMG electrodes (silver/silver chloride, pre-gelled, Ambu Blue Sensor, Denmark) (Konrad P.) with an interelectrode distance of 20 mm between centers were used to record an EMG signal during walking. Portable 8 channel (TELEEMG, BTS, Milan, Italy) with built in x10 amplifications, 10-450 Hz bandpass and sampling rate of 1000 Hz were used for recording. The location and orientation of the electrodes for each MH (ST) and LH (BF) were identified according to SENIAM (Surface ElectromyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles) criteria. Other: Q angle measurement Q angle measurement was applied to both patellofemoral pain and control group subjects in standing position. |
- Time difference between the onsets of the medial and lateral hamstring muscles [ Time Frame: Preparing participants that include skin preparation and electrodes placement, and recording EMG data took average one hour for each participant ]The surface EMG electrodes (silver/silver chloride, pre-gelled, Ambu Blue Sensor, Denmark) (Konrad P.) with an interelectrode distance of 20 mm between centers were used to record an EMG signal during walking. Portable 8 channel (TELEEMG, BTS, Milan, Italy) with built in x10 amplifications, 10-450 Hz bandpass and sampling rate of 1000 Hz were used for recording. The location and orientation of the electrodes for each MH (ST) and LH (BF) were identified according to SENIAM (Surface ElectromyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles) criteria
- kujala patellofemoral pain scale [ Time Frame: At the begining of the study each participant was asked to complete the scale. It took average 10 minutes. Performed once. ]Kujala patellofemoral pain scale (Kujala 1993) is composed of 13 items that evaluate subjective symptoms and functional limitations. Minimum score is 0 points and maximum score is 100 points; higher values represent a worse outcome. Kujala patellofemoral pain scale is reported to be responsive, valid and demonstrates high test-retest reliability (Crosley K.2014). Turkish version of the Kujala patellofemoral pain score was used in our study (Kuru T. 2010).
- Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [ Time Frame: Performed 1 day once. ]The NRS is an 11-point scale consisting of integers from 0 through 10; 0 representing ''No pain'' and 10 representing ''Worst imaginable pain.'' Participants select the single number that best represents their pain intensity.
- Q angle [ Time Frame: Performed 1 day once. ]Q angle measurement in standing
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 40 Years (Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criterias:
- Pain originating specifically from the patellofemoral articulation (vague or localized);
- At least 3/10 pain intensity accordingly to the Numeric Analog Scale (NAS) with at least 2 of the following functional activities commonly associated with PFP stair ascent or descent, squatting, kneeling, or prolonged sitting;
- Reports of pain greater than 2 months in duration.
- Being between 18-40 years of age
Exclusion Criterias:
- Previous history of knee surgery,
- History of patellar instability,
- Neurologic involvement that would influence gait
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03392688
| Turkey | |
| Istanbul University,Faculty of Medicine, Deparment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gait Analysis Laboratory | |
| Istanbul, Europe, Turkey, 34093 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Dilber Karagozoglu Coskunsu, Ass. Prof. | Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation | |
| Study Director: | Filiz Can, Prof. | Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation | |
| Study Chair: | Necla Ozturk, Prof. | Maltepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Deparment of Biophysics | |
| Study Chair: | N. Ekin Akalın, Prof. | Kultur University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation |
| Responsible Party: | Dilber Karagozoglu Coskunsu, Assistant Professor, Bahçeşehir University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03392688 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
BahcesehirU |
| First Posted: | January 8, 2018 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | January 8, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | January 2018 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Yes |
| Supporting Materials: |
Study Protocol |
| Time Frame: | starting 6 months after publication |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
onset , hamstring muscles, patellofemoral pain |
|
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases |

