Cryopreservation of White Blood Cells Before Their UVA Irradiation for Graft Versus Host Disease Treatment (cryo-ECP)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03361254 |
|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified January 2020 by Central Hospital, Nancy, France.
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
First Posted : December 4, 2017
Last Update Posted : January 27, 2020
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a worldwide recognized treatment of acute and chronic mild to moderate graft versus host disease (GVHD), in second or further line of treatment. Contrary to immunosuppressive drugs, ECP is not associated with side effects such as opportunistic infections, and is not associated with a higher frequency of relapse of the initial hematological disease. High intensity of ECP regimen (1 to 3 sessions per week, in case of chronic or acute GVHD) seems to be correlated to a higher efficacy. However, high intensity of ECP treatment is often difficult to sustain, because of frequent logistical problems to perform aphereses, such as venous access failure, infections of central line, deep blood cytopenias that require many transfusions before performing aphereses. Merlin et al. first described the feasibility of white blood cells cryopreservation before UVA irradiation, in vitro, then in vivo. We also recently reported the feasibility and efficacy of cryopreserved ECP in a series of 20 patients (adults and children), with acute and chronic GVHD, who had recurrent contraindications to aphereses, that prevented the realization of an intensive program of ECP. No adverse events occurred, and efficacy seemed to be similar to "classical" ECP (35% of complete overall response, and 40% of partial response). White blood cells (WBC) were divided after collection on Optia or Cellex apheresis machines: one was immediately treated with 8-MOP (methoxsalen) and ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation, while the other was cryopreserved, and further (a few days later) thawed, sensitized with 8-MOP and irradiated before injection to the patient.
The aim of this study is to analyze this method in a prospective way, with complete biological data collection, of apoptosis, cytokines release etc…, necessary to the full description of cryopreservation of white blood cells before their irradiation and reinjection to the patient.
We will propose this technique of cryopreservation to every patient with an indication of ECP for acute or chronic GVHD in Nancy Hospital for 18 months.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Graft Versus Host Disease | Biological: cryopreservation | Not Applicable |
The main objective of this prospective interventional pilot study is to demonstrate the ability of this technique to follow high intensity regimen recommendations, as mentioned above:
- 3 ECP sessions (thawed or fresh) per week during 3 months for grade III to IV acute GVHD, then
- 2 ECP sessions (thawed or fresh) per week during 3 months for grade II acute GVHD
- 1 ECP session per week for chronic GVHD during 3 months
The other objectives are:
- To describe the safety and efficacy of cryo ECP. Efficacy will be assessed with a composite criteria test, comporting 5 items, which will be compared for each patient with a paired cohort of historical patients treated in Nancy University Hospital since 2010 (match will be made on type and grade of GVHD, and age under and over 18 year-old)
- To fully describe the biological consequences of cryopreservation of WBC before UVA irradiation: apoptosis rate and time, lymphocyte functional tests (lymphoblastic transformation test), cytokines release, number of lymphocytes, and monocytes at the time of reinjection, bacteriological tests, residual diméthylsulfoxyde (DMSO) quantification
- To demonstrate the decrease in red blood cells and platelets transfusion number, due to the sparing effect of cryo ECP on aphereses number.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 5 participants |
| Allocation: | N/A |
| Intervention Model: | Single Group Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | demonstrate the ability of this technique to follow high intensity regimen recommendations |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Division and Cryopreservation of Autologous Blood Nuclear Cells for Intensive Regimen of Extracorporeal Photopheresis : Interest for the Treatment of Patients With Steroid Resistant Graft Versus Host Disease |
| Estimated Study Start Date : | March 31, 2020 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | June 30, 2020 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | September 30, 2020 |
- Biological: cryopreservation
cryopreservation to every patient with an indication of ECP for acute or chronic GVHD in Nancy Hospital for 18 months
- intensity of ECP regimen [ Time Frame: 3 months after the first ECP session ]Number of ECP (fresh and thawed) sessions during 3 months
- systemic infections during 3 months after cryo-ECP (safety) [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session ]
- occurrence of death after cryo-ECP (safety) [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session ]
- occurrence of relapse of the initial hematological disease after cryo-ECP (safety) [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session ]
- Steroid sparing effect (efficacy) [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session ]
- GVHD grade (severity) (efficacy) [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session ]
- immunosuppressive drugs used (efficacy) [ Time Frame: at 6 weeks and 3 months after the first ECP session ]
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult or child who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with a medical follow-up at the University Hospital of Nancy, or at the other University Hospitals in the great East region (Dijon, Reims, Besançon) in which ECP is not accessible.
- Eligible for ECP for the treatment of acute or chronic steroid refractory GVHD, after pluridisciplinary concertations
- Patients (or parents) who received full information on the research and who signed a consent for this research
Non inclusion Criteria:
- Children under 10 kg of weight
- Patients or parents who did not sign a consent
- Patients who present an absolute contra-indication for apheresis: recent pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, active and evolutive bacterial or fungal infection, hemodynamics instability, deep anemia (Hb < 8g/dl) or deep thrombocytopenia (< 20 g/L) despite transfusions, severe hypocalcemia.
- Women in age to procreate without contraception
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03361254
| Contact: Cécile POCHON, Dr. | 00 33 3 83 15 46 28 | c.pochon@chru-nancy.fr |
| Responsible Party: | Central Hospital, Nancy, France |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03361254 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
APJC2015/CRYOPCE-POCHON/NK |
| First Posted: | December 4, 2017 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | January 27, 2020 |
| Last Verified: | January 2020 |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
| Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: | No |
|
Graft vs Host Disease Immune System Diseases |

