Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03344445

Recruitment Status : Unknown

Verified March 2018 by IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting

First Posted : November 17, 2017

Last Update Posted : March 9, 2018

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch

Study Description

Brief Summary:

To investigate the differenec of patients' satisfaction and information gain betweem face-to-face interview and video introduction

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Anesthesia	Other: video-assisted pre anesthesia explain	Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

We made up a video which showed the type, the method, the risk, and the benefit of all anesthesia with words, pictures, and image. A study nurse will ask the will of patients. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly divided into traditional group(control group) and study group(study group). The study group will watch the video at first, then our anesthesiologist visit the patient. The control group will receive traditional anesthesiologist visit. After doctors' visit, the patients have to complete a test and a questionnaire. The patients who don't participate in the study will have traditional visit and no test.

Study Design

Layout table for study information

Study Type :	Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment :	250 participants
Allocation:	Randomized
Intervention Model:	Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:	simple compare of information gain between traditional visit and video-assisted visit
Masking:	Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:	Other
Official Title:	Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit
Actual Study Start Date :	January 1, 2017
Estimated Primary Completion Date :	December 31, 2018
Estimated Study Completion Date :	December 31, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/treatment
No Intervention: traditional vist Patients receive traditional anesthesiologist visit
Experimental: video-assisted Patients watch the video, then an anesthesiologist visit	Other: video-assisted pre anesthesia explain Anesthesiologist will visit all study patients, and only the experimental group will read the video.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :

inform gain analysis [ Time Frame: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data ]
The score of test would represent the inform gain of patient
satification anaylsis [ Time Frame: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data ]
The score of questionnaire represent the ratification of patient

Eligibility Criteria

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information

Ages Eligible for Study:	Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:	All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	Yes

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

All adult patients were included who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was expected or unexpected.,Repeated general anesthesia had been performed in the previous 6 months,ASA classification was more than or equal to III,There were pronounced cognitive and or speech barriers

Contacts and Locations

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03344445

Sponsors and Collaborators

IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch

Investigators

Layout table for investigator information

Study Chair:	Li Kuei Chen, M.D.	National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch

More Information

Publications of Results:

Yang YL, Wang KJ, Chen WH, Chuang KC, Tseng CC, Liu CC. Improved satisfaction of preoperative patients after group video-teaching during interview at preanesthetic evaluation clinic: the experience of a medical center in Taiwan. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2007 Sep;45(3):149-54.

Snyder-Ramos SA, Seintsch H, Böttiger BW, Motsch J, Martin E, Bauer M. Patient satisfaction and information gain after the preanesthetic visit: a comparison of face-to-face interview, brochure, and video. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1753-1758. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153010.49776.E5.

Layout table for additonal information

Responsible Party:	IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch, Department of Anesthesia, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT03344445
Other Study ID Numbers:	102-019-E
First Posted:	November 17, 2017 Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted:	March 9, 2018
Last Verified:	March 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD:	No

Layout table for additional information

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:	No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:	No

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Layout table for MeSH terms

Anesthetics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs

To Top