Recovering From Intimate Partner Violence Through Strengths and Empowerment (RISE) (RISE)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03261700 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : August 25, 2017
Results First Posted : March 30, 2023
Last Update Posted : March 30, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major health concern for women Veterans. IPV is associated with numerous physical and mental health conditions. VHA is implementing IPV screening programs to identify female patients who experience past-year IPV. Despite strong evidence that screening increases detection of IPV, less is established about how to intervene following IPV disclosure in health care settings, in order to improve health outcomes. Existing healthcare-based interventions result in minimal effects on health and well-being, likely because they are too brief and generic.
In response, the PI has developed Recovering from IPV through Strengths and Empowerment (RISE), based on the IPV-related health care needs and preferences of women Veterans. RISE is designed to be delivered in primary care and is an individualized, variable-length, modular-based intervention that addresses
- safety planning;
- education on the health effects of IPV and warning signs;
- increasing coping skills and self-care;
- enhancing social support;
- making difficult decisions; and
- connecting with resources. This study is aimed at refining and evaluating RISE for use with female VA patients who have experienced past-year IPV. This brief counseling intervention is intended to be administered in conjunction with primary care, as this is a frequent point of healthcare contact for women Veterans and where disclosure of IPV is most prevalent.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Intimate Partner Violence Self-efficacy | Behavioral: RISE Other: Information and referral condition | Not Applicable |

Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 60 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | For the RCT (Aim 3), participants will be randomized to RISE or an information and referral condition. |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Masking Description: | Open label |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Recovering From Intimate Partner Violence Through Strengths and Empowerment (RISE): Tailoring and Evaluating a Patient-Centered Counseling Intervention for Women Veterans |
Actual Study Start Date : | October 22, 2018 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | November 23, 2020 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | November 23, 2020 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: RISE
This provider- administered brief- counseling intervention program will increase Women Veteran?s self- efficacy in addressing violence in their current or past relationships. The variable length (up to six- session) modular-based intervention aims at providing resources for WVs in the relevant domains of: 1) safety planning, 2) education on health effects of IPV, 3) improving coping and self- care and red flags, 4) enhancing social support, 5) making difficult decisions, and 5) connecting with resources.
|
Behavioral: RISE
This provider- administered brief- counseling intervention program will increase Women Veteran's self- efficacy in addressing violence in their current or past relationships. The variable length (up to six- session) modular-based intervention aims at providing resources for WVs in the relevant domains of: 1) safety planning, 2) education on health effects of IPV and red flags, 3) improving coping and self- care, 4) enhancing social support, 5) making difficult decisions, and 5) connecting with resources.
Other Name: Recovering from IPV through Strengths and Empowerment |
Active Comparator: Information and referral condition
This brochure-based intervention includes education about IPV, health effects of IPV, resources and referral options to address a wide-array of health and social issues associated with IPV, and safety planning. Participants randomized to this arm are offered resources and referrals to VA and community resources.
|
Other: Information and referral condition
Participants randomized to this arm will receive a brochure-based intervention, consisting of education, support and problem solving, safety planning as well as resources and referrals to address an array of health and social issues associated with IPV (including in VA and the community).
Other Name: Control condition |
- Empowerment Via the Personal Progress Scale Revised [ Time Frame: Baseline,10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures change in sense of personal empowerment; minimum value = 28 and maximum score = 196; higher scores indicate higher personal empowerment
- Self-efficacy Via the General Self-Efficacy Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]This scale is a self-report of change in general self-efficacy; minimum score = 4 and maximum score = 40; higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy
- Valued Living Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures change in valued living, and congruence between stated values and past-week valued behavior; Composite scores range from 10 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores reflect higher valued living (i.e., an indicator of higher quality of life)
- Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures change in patient engagement in needed health care; scores are transferred to a theoretical 0-100 scale; higher scores indicate higher patient activation.
- PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures change in DSM-5 PTSD symptom severity. Scores range from 0-80; higher scores reflect higher/worse PTSD symptoms.
- Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures change in depressive symptoms; This measure ranges from 0-60; higher scores reflect (worse) higher levels of symptoms
- SF-12 Health Survey [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-Week follow-up, and 14-Week follow-up Assessments ]Measures change in physical-health related quality of life. Specifically, quantitative ratings of overall physical health functioning were rated on a Likert scale of 1-5 (1 = excellent, 2 = very good, 3 = good, 4 = fair, 5 = poor).
- Conflict Tactic Scales Revised [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures change in overall number of different IPV acts over time (i.e., total count score). This measure ranges from 0-33; higher scores reflect higher levels of IPV (i.e., a worse outcome).
- Physical, Mental and Social Service Care Use [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures overall number of VA and non-VA health care visits (inclusive of physical, mental health, and social service use visits).
- Client Services Questionnaire (CSQ-8) [ Time Frame: 10-week follow-up assessment ]Measures satisfaction with treatment; Scores range from 8 to 32; higher scores reflect higher satisfaction with treatment (i.e., a better outcome)
- Patient Health Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures change in somatic and physical health symptoms; score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing higher levels of physical health problems
- Safety Behaviors Checklist [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures the present use of safety behaviors participants are currently using to protect themselves. Each of the 15 items of this measure corresponds to a specific safety behavior. Participant indicates whether they have used each behavior using a dichotomous response option (yes = 1; no = 0). Scores are summed, with total scores ranging from 0-15. Higher scores indicate a higher number of safety behaviors enacted.
- Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures patient resilience; Scores range from 0-100,with higher scores reflecting higher resilience
- Depression Anxiety Stress Scale- Anxiety Subscale [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures anxiety symptom severity; Scores range from 0-42, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
- Coping Strategies Inventory - Short Form [ Time Frame: Baseline, 10-week follow-up, and 14-week follow-up assessments ]Measures engagement coping skills; Scores range from 8-40, with higher score reflecting better coping
- Brief Semi-structured Interview to Assess Acceptability and Feasibility of the Intervention, With Perceived Helpfulness Rating. [ Time Frame: Assessed at 10-week follow-up or 14-week follow-up, values at the end of 14 weeks reported ]Semi-structured qualitative interview questions developed for the purpose of this study to assess participants' perceptions of the acceptability, with a particular item to assess overall helpfulness of the intervention. Specifically, quantitative ratings of overall helpfulness were rated on a Likert scale of 1-5 (1=highly helpful, 2 = somewhat helpful, 3 = neither helpful nor unhelpful, 4 = somewhat unhelpful, 5=highly unhelpful).

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | Female |
Gender Based Eligibility: | Yes |
Gender Eligibility Description: | Self-identify as female |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants will be eligible to participate if they:
- Self-identify as a woman
- Are at least 18 years of age
- A patient at VA Boston Healthcare System
- Self- reported that they have experienced past-year physical, sexual, or psychological IPV
- Ability to understand study procedures in English
- Not exhibiting symptoms of mania or psychosis
- Not actively in suicidal crisis warranting imminent hospitalization
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any violation of inclusion criteria

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03261700
United States, Massachusetts | |
VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA | |
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130 |
Principal Investigator: | Katherine M. Iverson, PhD MA BA | VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA |
Documents provided by VA Office of Research and Development:
Other Publications:
Responsible Party: | VA Office of Research and Development |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03261700 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
IIR 16-062 1I01HX002178-01A1 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Posted: | August 25, 2017 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | March 30, 2023 |
Last Update Posted: | March 30, 2023 |
Last Verified: | June 2022 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: | No |
women Veterans interpersonal violence |