Digital Literacy Promotion (DLP)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03121365 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : April 20, 2017
Results First Posted : November 20, 2019
Last Update Posted : November 5, 2020
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Language Development Literacy | Behavioral: Digital/E-Book Arm Behavioral: Standard/Board Book Arm | Not Applicable |
This study has three main objectives. The first is to test the effects of digital versus standard literacy promotion by way of a randomized controlled trial design. The second aim is to explore the reading behaviors and reading activities between parents and their infants when comparing the use of e-books to standard board books. The third aim is to identify themes regarding dialogical reading behaviors among parents participating in the video sub-study.
Participants will be stratified by clinic site and randomized to receive literacy promotion using 1) standard early reader board books or 2) digital electronic early reader e-books. We will recruit and consent one hundred eligible parent-infant dyads, with the infant being between 5 and 7 months of age at enrollment.
In this intervention, parent-infant dyads randomized to the digital arm will receive developmentally appropriate e-books. Those randomized to the standard arm will receive developmentally appropriate board books. Participants will receive either the e-book or board book at the time of their 6, 9 and 12 month well visits. In addition to the books, parent-infant dyads in both arms will be provided information on the importance of early parent-child reading activity by pediatric clinicians using the Reach Out and Read framework.
The main outcome will be differences in Bayley-3 Composite scores between groups. Secondary aims include differences in StimQ Reading Subscale Scores and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Scores between groups.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 104 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | Eligible participants will be stratified by site and randomized 1:1 |
| Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
| Primary Purpose: | Prevention |
| Official Title: | Digital Literacy Promotion Among Medicaid Children |
| Actual Study Start Date : | April 19, 2017 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | December 31, 2018 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | December 31, 2018 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard/Board Book Arm
Parent-infant dyads randomized to the standard/board book arm will receive developmentally appropriate early reader board books at the time of their infant's 6, 9, and 12 month well visits. In addition to the books, parent-infant dyads will be provided information on the importance of early parent-child reading activity by pediatric clinicians using the Reach Out and Read framework.
|
Behavioral: Standard/Board Book Arm
Promotion of early reader board book reading |
|
Experimental: Digital/E-Book Arm
Parent-infant dyads randomized to the digital/e-book arm will receive developmentally appropriate e-books at the time of their infant's 6, 9, and 12 month well visits. In addition to the books, parent-infant dyads will be provided information on the importance of early parent-child reading activity by pediatric clinicians using the Reach Out and Read framework.
|
Behavioral: Digital/E-Book Arm
Promotion of early reader digital e-book reading |
- Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Infant is 12-18 Months Old) [ Time Frame: Second Study visit (approximately one month after child is age-eligible for 12 month well child visit) ]
Evaluation of the infant's cognitive, language and motor development using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III).
Results were reported as composites of cognitive, language, and motor scores, where data were continuous variables on a scale with a normal distribution of 95%. The composite scores are scaled to a metric with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, and range from 40-160. A composite score above 77.5 is considered developmentally average and a composite score below 77.5 is considered a developmental concern. Data were described using mean and standard deviation. Significance was considered at a level of 0.05.
- StimQ READ Subscale Change Score [ Time Frame: 1 month after the 6, 9, and 12 month well visits ]
Differences in StimQ READ Subscale scores collected approximately 1 month after the 6, 9, and 12 month well visits.
Reading activity is measured using the StimQ READ subscale. This contains "yes/no" questions reflecting access to books, frequency of shared reading, and variety of books read in homes of young children, ages 5 to 36 months. The StimQ-Infant READ subscale is for use with infants 5-12 months of age and the StimQ-Toddler READ subscale is used with toddlers 12-36 months of age. The StimQ Infant and Toddler Read Subscales include a point scale for measuring cognitive stimulation resulting from the reading activity. Scores for the StimQ-Infant READ scale range from 0-15 with higher scores (greater number values) reflective of higher reading exposure. Scores for the StimQ-Toddler READ scale range from 0-19 with higher scores (greater number values) reflective of higher reading exposure.
- Frequency of Parent-Reported Board Book Reading [ Time Frame: 1 month ]Frequency of board book reading in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
- Frequency of E-Book Reading [ Time Frame: 1 month ]Frequency of e-book reading in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
- Frequency of Television Viewing [ Time Frame: 1 month ]Frequency of television viewing in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
- Frequency of Board Book Reading [ Time Frame: 4 months ]Frequency of board book reading in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
- Frequency of E-Book Reading [ Time Frame: 4 months ]Frequency of e-book reading in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
- Frequency of Television Viewing [ Time Frame: 4 months ]Frequency of television viewing in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
- Frequency of Board Book Reading [ Time Frame: 7 months ]Frequency of board book reading in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
- Frequency of E-Book Reading [ Time Frame: 7 months ]Frequency of e-book reading in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
- Frequency of Television Viewing [ Time Frame: 7 months ]Frequency of television viewing in the prior two weeks. Parents reported frequency as very often, often, rarely, never. Very often and often categories were combined and rarely and never categories were combined. We report number in each arm who report very often/often.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 5 Months to 7 Months (Child) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- English or Spanish speaking
- Parents ≥ 15 years of age at start of study
- Child born ≥ 35 weeks estimated gestational age
- Child 5 to 7 months
- Medicaid Insurance
- Access to a smart phone and/or tablet
Exclusion Criteria:
- Child has neurodevelopmental disabilities or congenital malformation
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03121365
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104 | |
| Principal Investigator: | James Guevara | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia |
Documents provided by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia:
| Responsible Party: | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03121365 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
16-013524 |
| First Posted: | April 20, 2017 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | November 20, 2019 |
| Last Update Posted: | November 5, 2020 |
| Last Verified: | November 2020 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Yes |
| Plan Description: | Following completion of all analyses, data will be de-identified and made available for other investigators. |
| Supporting Materials: |
Study Protocol |
| Time Frame: | 12 months after publication of all relevant papers |
| Access Criteria: | De-identified only |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Digital literacy Reading |

