Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparison of Unilateral or Bilateral Fixation in the Treatment of LFS

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02985138
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 7, 2016
Last Update Posted : January 25, 2022
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Xiaofei Cheng, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Brief Summary:
TLIF is a popular lumbar fusion technique to perform interbody fusion. Pedicle screws providing initial stability have been developed to correct deformity, improve the rate of fusion and speed patient's postoperative recovery. Conventionally, bilateral pedicle screw fixation is a standard approach. Recently, studies have revealed that unilateral pedicle screw fixation provides equivalent clinical outcomes and fusion rates as compared with bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar fusion. Meanwhile, the unilateral approach can reduce intraoperative blood loss and operating time. To our knowledge, few randomized controlled studies comparing unilateral versus bilateral instrumented TLIF in lumbar degenerative diseases have been reported. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes in a series of patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis using instrumented TLIF with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Procedure: TLIF and unilateral pedicle screw fixation Procedure: TLIF and bilateral pedicle screw fixation Device: Pedicle screw and cage Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 53 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Comparison of Unilateral or Bilateral Fixation Using Pedicle Screws and TLIF in the Treatment of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis
Actual Study Start Date : December 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date : September 2021
Actual Study Completion Date : September 2021

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Unilateral fixation
Patients undergoing TLIF and unilateral pedicle screw fixation
Procedure: TLIF and unilateral pedicle screw fixation
TLIF combined with posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation

Device: Pedicle screw and cage
Pedicle screw and cage

Active Comparator: Bilateral fixation
Patients undergoing TLIF and bilateral pedicle screw fixation
Procedure: TLIF and bilateral pedicle screw fixation
TLIF combined with posterior bilateral pedicle screw fixation

Device: Pedicle screw and cage
Pedicle screw and cage




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores [ Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Adverse events related to procedure [ Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively ]
  2. Operative duration [ Time Frame: 1 week postoperatively ]
  3. Estimated blood loss [ Time Frame: 1 week postoperatively ]
  4. Length of hospital stay [ Time Frame: 1 week after discharge ]
  5. Spinal angles [ Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively ]
    Radiographic parameters

  6. Intervertebral space height [ Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively ]
    Radiographic parameters

  7. Foraminal height [ Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively ]
    Radiographic parameters

  8. Cost of treatment [ Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively ]
  9. Fusion rate [ Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively ]
  10. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [ Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively ]


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  • Signed informed consent.
  • Patient is willing to be available for each examination scheduled over the study duration.
  • Lumbar foraminal stenosis diagnosed by patient history, physical examination and image confirmation.
  • Patient has symptoms referable to the stenosis level (low back pain, leg pain, tingling, numbness or weakness), which are relieved after a selective nerve root block.
  • Has not responded to conservative treatment for a period of 3 months (e.g. bed rest, physical therapy, medication, manipulations, other).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has systemic infection, highly communicable diseases, inflammatory or autoimmune disease (e.g. osteomyelitis, crohn's, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus, gout, HIV/AIDS, active tuberculosis, venereal disease, active hepatitis).
  • Has presence of active malignancy
  • Has a history of severe allergy
  • Has a significant medical history that, in the investigator's opinion, would not make them a good study candidate.
  • Pregnant, or may become pregnant within follow-up period of study
  • Has other spinal conditions that will interfere with clinical outcomes (e.g. spinal structural deformities, spinal fractures, ankylosing spondylitis, spinal tuberculosis, spinal infection, spinal tumors, symptomatic cervical spinal disease)
  • Spondylolisthesis at the target level
  • Has undergone previous lumbar surgery
  • Has severe osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -3.5)
  • BMI > 35kg/m2
  • Has a diagnosis, which requires postoperative medication that interferes with fusion, such as steroids.
  • Has history of endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehlers-Danios syndrome or osteogenesis imperfecta)

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02985138


Locations
Layout table for location information
China
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital
Shanghai, China, 200011
Sponsors and Collaborators
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Xiaofei Cheng, Principal Investigator, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02985138    
Other Study ID Numbers: SNPHO-161116
First Posted: December 7, 2016    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: January 25, 2022
Last Verified: January 2022
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Constriction, Pathologic
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical