Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of MANTA Vascular Closure Device

• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02521948
• Recruitment Status: Completed
• First Posted: August 13, 2015
• Results First Posted: October 29, 2018
• Last Update Posted: October 29, 2018
• Sponsor: Essential Medical, Inc.
• Information provided by (Responsible Party): Essential Medical, Inc.

Study Description

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device (VCD) to close the arteriotomy following percutaneous cardiovascular procedures utilizing large bore sheaths for purposes of supporting a CE Mark (Conformite Europeenne--"European Conformity") and other regulatory submissions. The study will assess whether the MANTA VCD is safe and performs as intended for large-bore vascular closure after interventional procedures.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Femoral Arteriotomy Closure	Device: MANTA Vascular Closure Device	Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of MANTA in achieving hemostasis in femoral arterial access sites in patients undergoing percutaneous transcatheter interventional procedures using a 10-18F procedure sheath (such as Transcather Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR), Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty (BAV) and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)) for purposes of obtaining a CE Mark in the European Union.

The study will evaluate hemostasis success, time to hemostasis and ambulation, treatment success, and the rate of access-site-related complications in comparison to published literature on other hemostasis techniques for closing these large bore punctures (primarily, surgical closure and suture-mediated percutaneous closure.

Study Design

• Study Type: Interventional (Clinical Trial)
• Actual Enrollment: 50 participants
• Allocation: N/A
• Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)
• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Official Title: Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of MANTA Vascular Closure Device
• Study Start Date: July 2015
• Actual Primary Completion Date: February 2016
• Actual Study Completion Date: May 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/treatment
Experimental: MANTA Vascular Closure Device; The MANTA device, developed by Essential Medical, Inc., is a vascular closure device (VCD) intended for use in catheterization laboratories following percutaneous cardiac or peripheral procedures that use the retrograde common femoral artery access route for large bore (10-18F) interventional devices.	Device: MANTA Vascular Closure Device; The MANTA device developed by Essential Medical, Inc., is a vascular closure device (VCD) intended for use in catheterization laboratories following percutaneous cardiac or peripheral procedures that use the retrograde common femoral artery access route for large bore (10-18F) interventional devices.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :

1. Number of Participants With Major Complications [ Time Frame: Within either the first 30 days (plus or minus 7 days) after the procedure or the first 60 days (plus or minus 14 days) after the procedure ]

   Composite endpoint that includes any of the following adverse events:

   • Access site-related bleeding requiring blood transfusion or vascular repair
   • Vascular injury requiring repair (e.g. perforation, dissection, arterio-venous fistula, retroperitoneal bleed, pseudoaneurysm)
   • Femoral artery stenosis at the access site requiring intervention
   • New ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia causing a threat to the viability of the limb
   • Access site-related infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or extended hospitalization
   • New onset access site-related neuropathy in the ipsilateral lower extremity requiring surgical repair
   • Permanent access site-related nerve injury (lasting>30 days)
2. Hemostasis Success [ Time Frame: Within the first 10 minutes of cutting the MANTA suture ]
   Hemostasis at the puncture site within 10 minutes of cutting the MANTA suture without need for manual or mechanical compression and without later re-bleeding (trivial or subcutaneous oozing will not be considered bleeding; light finger pressure to control subcutaneous oozing will not be considered manual compression)

Secondary Outcome Measures :

1. Time to Hemostasis [ Time Frame: Time between MANTA deployment and first observed and confirmed arterial hemostasis up to ten (10) minutes after MANTA device is deployed. ]
   The elapsed time between MANTA deployment (withdrawal of sheath from artery) and first observed and confirmed arterial hemostasis (no or minimal subcutaneous oozing and the absence of expanding or developing hematoma).

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Sexes Eligible for Study: All
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Candidate for non-emergent transcatheter interventional procedure via a 10-18F femoral sheath (e.g., transcatheter aortic valve replacement [TAVR], balloon aortic valvuloplasty [BAV], Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm [AAA] stent-graft placement)
• Eligible for sheath removal in the catheterization lab
• Age ≥18 years
• Understand and sign the study specific written informed consent form
• Able and willing to fulfill the follow-up requirements
• In the Investigator's opinion, the patient is suitable for the MANTA vascular closure device, conventional hemostasis techniques and participation in an investigational trial
• Patients of childbearing age with Negative Pregnancy Test within 7 days of procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

Baseline Exclusions:

• Patients who are known to be pregnant or lactating
• Patients who are immunocompromised or with pre-existing autoimmune disease
• Patients who have a systemic infection or a local infection at or near the access site
• Patients requiring a re-puncture at a site previously punctured within 48 hours
• Patients with significant anemia (hemoglobin < 6.5 mmol/l, Hct<30)
• Patients who are morbidly obese or cachectic (BMI >40 or <20)
• Patients with Systolic Blood Pressure >180 mmHg, unless Systolic Pressure can be lowered by pharmacological agents prior to closure
• Patients who are currently participating in another clinical trial of an investigational device or drug that has not concluded the follow-up period
• Patients in whom an antegrade puncture is performed or planned
• Patients with a known bleeding disorder including thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150 x 10^9/L), thrombasthenia, hemophilia, or von Willebrand's disease
• Patients with a femoral artery <6 mm in diameter, femoral artery stenosis resulting in a vessel diameter <6 mm, or patients with severe peripheral vascular disease
• Common femoral artery with fluoroscopically visible calcium, as determined by Angio CT, precluding safe access in the opinion of the investigator
• Patients with allergy to bovine materials, collagen and/or collagen products, or polyglycolic or polylactic acid polymers
• Patients who cannot adhere to or complete the investigational protocol for any reason including but not limited to geographical residence or life threatening disease
• Patients with Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) scores >12
• Patients punctured through a vascular graft
• Patients with known allergy to stainless steel or nickel
• Patients who have acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 48 hours prior to procedure
• Patients with unilateral or bilateral lower extremity amputation
• Patients with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl)
• Patients undergoing therapeutic thrombolysis
• Patients who are unable to ambulate at baseline
• Patients undergoing an interventional procedure whom are being treated with warfarin
• Patients requiring a continuous oral anticoagulation therapy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Italy

San Raffaele Hospital

Milan, Italy

Netherlands

St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

Nieuwegein, Netherlands

Erasmus Medical Center

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Sponsors and Collaborators

Essential Medical, Inc.

More Information

Publications:

Ben-Dor I, Looser P, Bernardo N, Maluenda G, Torguson R, Xue Z, Lindsay J, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Waksman R. Comparison of closure strategies after balloon aortic valvuloplasty: suture mediated versus collagen based versus manual. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):119-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22940.

Nelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, Rao V, Bianchi C, Hashemi H, Jones P, Bacharach JM. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial). J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.101. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

Kadakia MB, Herrmann HC, Desai ND, Fox Z, Ogbara J, Anwaruddin S, Jagasia D, Bavaria JE, Szeto WY, Vallabhajosyula P, Li R, Menon R, Kobrin DM, Giri J. Factors associated with vascular complications in patients undergoing balloon-expandable transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement via open versus percutaneous approaches. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(4):570-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001030. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

• Responsible Party: Essential Medical, Inc.
• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02521948
• Other Study ID Numbers: PSD-051
• First Posted: August 13, 2015
• Results First Posted: October 29, 2018
• Last Update Posted: October 29, 2018
• Last Verified: February 2018

Keywords provided by Essential Medical, Inc.:

MANTA; Arterial Closure Device; Large Bore Closure Device